SPEECHMOG

Analyze

My Analyses

Examples

Buy

(Analyzed: full video)

Analysis

Material name: "rowan-ellis__is-monogamy-a-social-construct"

Bandwidth

16.01

Chars/s

Extremely high

Flow

97.99

%

Extremely high

Clarity Score

93.74

%

Very high

Complexity

461.26

Chars^2

Extremely high

Speaking pace

How fast you speak and how much this varies over time. Only counting speaking segments (separated by silences longer than 5000ms).

00:00 49:14
Avg WPM
203.6
Total words
10021
Enabled minutes
49.23 min
WPM std dev
28.7
WPM std dev (%)
14.1
Speaking segments
1

Pronunciation Clarity

How confidently the transcription model understood your words.

Avg AI clarity
0.982
AI Clarity std dev
0.058
Words counted
10021

Pause metrics

Detected pauses (larger than 500ms) between words inside speaking segments.

00:00 49:14
Num pauses
20
Avg pause
679 ms
Median pause
635 ms
Total pause time
13580 ms
Pause ratio
0.5%
Pauses / minute
0.41
Enabled minutes
49.23 min

Long Pauses Metrics

Detected longer pauses (larger than 2000ms) between words inside speaking segments.

00:00 49:14
Num pauses
0
Avg pause
0 ms
Median pause
0 ms
Total pause time
0 ms
Pause ratio
0.0%
Pauses / minute
0.00
Enabled minutes
49.23 min

Filler words

How often you use sounds like “um” or “uh”.

00:00 49:14
Total words
10021
Filler count
29
Filler ratio
0.29%

Filler examples

uh, 04:24, (84%)uh,, 06:10, (91%)uh,, 06:48, (96%)uh,, 07:11, (94%)uh,, 08:32, (97%)Um,, 09:12, (99%)Um,, 09:21, (99%)uh,, 09:23, (93%)uh,, 09:27, (94%)Um,, 09:31, (95%)huh,, 09:50, (86%)uh,, 10:41, (95%)uh,, 13:44, (87%)uh,, 19:38, (93%)uh, 21:05, (86%)um,, 25:55, (100%)um,, 36:17, (97%)um,, 40:08, (99%)um,, 40:27, (99%)uh,, 44:33, (89%) + 9 more…

Vocabulary

How rich and varied your word choice is.

Total words
10021
Unique words
2085
Vocabulary by time (Root TTR)
20.828
Speaking minutes
49.23 min
Avg word length
4.72 chars

Most frequent words

"the" × 437"of" × 366"and" × 293"to" × 289"a" × 271"that" × 208"in" × 188"is" × 121"with" × 113"like" × 101"for" × 92"it" × 91"as" × 87"they" × 85"this" × 81

Phrasing

How you group words into sentences and clauses.

Sentences
468
Avg sentence length
21.4 words
Shortest sentence
1 words
Longest sentence
76 words
Subsentences
1040
Avg subsentence length
9.6 words
Shortest subsentence
1 words
Longest subsentence
58 words

Entire Lyrics

All lyrics colored after their clarity. The stronger blue, the more unclear the word was perceived to be.

The
100.0%
idea
100.0%
for
99.9%
this
100.0%
video
100.0%
began
100.0%
when
100.0%
I
100.0%
had
100.0%
the
99.9%
sudden
100.0%
realization
92.5%
that
100.0%
the
100.0%
Netflix
96.9%
dating
100.0%
show
99.2%
Love
100.0%
is
100.0%
Blind
100.0%
is
100.0%
both
100.0%
a
100.0%
polyamorous
97.2%
reality
100.0%
show
100.0%
and
99.9%
a
100.0%
dizzying
98.7%
speedrun
88.5%
on
99.6%
how
100.0%
normalized
89.8%
the
99.8%
most
100.0%
toxic
100.0%
elements
100.0%
of
100.0%
modern
100.0%
monogamy
100.0%
have
100.0%
become.
100.0%
Let
99.5%
me
100.0%
explain.
99.7%
So
99.1%
it's
99.9%
assumed
100.0%
that
99.9%
pretty
100.0%
much
100.0%
everyone
100.0%
is
99.9%
going
87.4%
to
100.0%
end
100.0%
up
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
99.9%
monogamous
100.0%
relationship
99.8%
that
99.9%
is
99.9%
an
100.0%
exclusive
99.8%
sexual
99.8%
and
99.6%
romantic
89.2%
partnership
100.0%
with
81.7%
one
100.0%
other
99.9%
person
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
exclusion
100.0%
of
100.0%
all
100.0%
others.
100.0%
Not
100.0%
only
100.0%
that,
100.0%
but
99.9%
this
100.0%
will
100.0%
happen
100.0%
via
100.0%
what
100.0%
is
100.0%
known
100.0%
as
100.0%
the
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
escalation,
84.4%
a
99.7%
series
100.0%
of
100.0%
milestones
100.0%
that
99.8%
you
100.0%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
pass
100.0%
through.
89.3%
Flirting,
95.0%
dating,
99.8%
becoming
81.1%
exclusive,
99.8%
having
99.9%
sex,
99.9%
saying
100.0%
I
99.9%
love
100.0%
you,
100.0%
moving
100.0%
in
100.0%
together,
100.0%
getting
100.0%
married,
84.4%
buying
100.0%
a
100.0%
house,
100.0%
having
100.0%
children.
100.0%
You
99.8%
get
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea.
100.0%
Traditionally,
100.0%
these
100.0%
aren't
100.0%
just
100.0%
expected.
99.4%
They
100.0%
are
100.0%
seen
100.0%
as
100.0%
essential
98.6%
requirements
100.0%
for
100.0%
a
100.0%
happy
100.0%
and
88.0%
fulfilled
91.5%
life.
100.0%
Monogamy
100.0%
has
100.0%
become
100.0%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
just
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
one
100.0%
on
99.5%
one
100.0%
relationship.
99.2%
It's
99.9%
bound
100.0%
up
100.0%
with
100.0%
all
100.0%
these
99.9%
other
100.0%
expectations
99.9%
of
99.9%
behavior
83.8%
and
89.3%
life
100.0%
choices.
99.7%
More
100.0%
and
100.0%
more,
100.0%
however,
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
questioning
100.0%
elements
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
99.9%
relationship
100.0%
escalator,
99.6%
deciding
100.0%
not
99.7%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
children
100.0%
or
100.0%
to
99.8%
forego
80.3%
marriage
88.7%
as
99.5%
an
100.0%
institution.
100.0%
In
99.9%
fact,
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
seem
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
expressing
100.0%
an
99.9%
interest
100.0%
in
99.9%
forgoing
85.5%
the
100.0%
escalator
100.0%
entirely
98.6%
in
100.0%
favor
85.3%
of
100.0%
creating
100.0%
their
100.0%
own
100.0%
version
100.0%
of
62.3%
relationship
100.0%
happiness,
100.0%
including
100.0%
the
100.0%
possibility
100.0%
of
53.1%
non
99.6%
monogamy.
100.0%
In
100.0%
a
100.0%
2023
99.9%
poll,
100.0%
YouGov
94.8%
found
100.0%
that
99.9%
34%
99.4%
of
100.0%
American
100.0%
couples
100.0%
prefer
99.8%
some
100.0%
form
100.0%
of
100.0%
non
99.9%
monogamy
99.9%
in
100.0%
their
81.9%
ideal
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
In
100.0%
a
100.0%
similar
100.0%
YouGov
98.5%
survey
98.8%
from
100.0%
2020,
99.9%
3,
99.9%
12%
99.9%
of
100.0%
adults
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
UK
100.0%
said
82.8%
said
94.3%
that
98.9%
they
99.9%
either
100.0%
have
100.0%
been,
99.9%
are
99.7%
in
99.9%
or
99.7%
are
77.7%
open
100.0%
to
99.9%
a
99.5%
polyamorous
96.3%
relationship.
100.0%
If
100.0%
you
100.0%
think
100.0%
about
100.0%
it,
98.6%
no
100.0%
other
100.0%
interpersonal
100.0%
relationships
100.0%
we
99.9%
have
100.0%
are
99.9%
treated
100.0%
with
100.0%
such
100.0%
a
99.8%
singular
100.0%
scarcity
100.0%
mindset
100.0%
as
100.0%
mainstream
100.0%
ideas
100.0%
of
100.0%
monogamous
99.9%
romance.
99.0%
No
100.0%
other
100.0%
type
97.6%
of
100.0%
human
99.9%
connection
100.0%
comes
100.0%
with
99.8%
these
99.8%
strict
99.7%
solo
99.8%
expectations
93.3%
of
98.7%
being
99.9%
everything
100.0%
to
100.0%
someone
100.0%
being
100.0%
a
99.7%
sole
99.3%
priority.
100.0%
In
100.0%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
way,
99.8%
you
99.9%
aren't
100.0%
expected
99.9%
to
100.0%
like
81.7%
only
100.0%
love
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
your
100.0%
children
100.0%
or
99.9%
one
100.0%
of
99.9%
your
100.0%
parents
98.0%
at,
99.9%
uh,
73.9%
a
99.9%
time,
100.0%
because
100.0%
we
99.9%
understand
100.0%
that
100.0%
all
100.0%
other
99.9%
types
96.2%
of
100.0%
love
100.0%
are,
100.0%
um,
88.3%
not
100.0%
finite.
100.0%
And
99.4%
yet,
99.9%
when
100.0%
it
100.0%
comes
100.0%
to
100.0%
romantic
92.6%
relationships,
100.0%
monogamy
100.0%
is
80.6%
a
99.9%
model
99.1%
often
100.0%
comes
99.3%
with
99.8%
these
99.8%
ideas,
100.0%
pressures
79.2%
and
99.9%
expectations
100.0%
at
72.6%
its
91.9%
worst,
80.8%
leading
99.7%
to
99.9%
jealousy,
100.0%
obsession
96.4%
and
99.9%
possessiveness.
99.6%
So
99.7%
what
100.0%
might
100.0%
an
99.8%
alternative
100.0%
look
100.0%
like?
99.5%
There's
99.6%
a
100.0%
few
100.0%
terms
99.8%
that
99.9%
we're
99.9%
going
91.2%
to
100.0%
use
100.0%
in
100.0%
this
100.0%
video
100.0%
to
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
these
100.0%
kinds
99.9%
of
100.0%
relationships
100.0%
outside
100.0%
of
100.0%
traditional
100.0%
monogamy.
99.7%
Like
99.7%
with
99.8%
many
100.0%
words
100.0%
that
99.8%
we've
99.9%
invented
100.0%
to
100.0%
describe
99.6%
feelings
100.0%
and,
99.5%
you
94.2%
know,
100.0%
identities
100.0%
and
99.9%
behaviors,
99.5%
coming
100.0%
up
100.0%
with
100.0%
a
99.5%
universally
100.0%
agreed
99.8%
definition
100.0%
that
100.0%
is
99.5%
true
100.0%
for
99.6%
all
99.5%
People
100.0%
who
99.9%
use
100.0%
that
99.9%
word
100.0%
all
99.8%
of
99.1%
the
100.0%
time
100.0%
is
99.9%
very
100.0%
difficult.
99.9%
I
99.8%
think
100.0%
it's
99.3%
especially
100.0%
true
99.9%
when
96.0%
dealing
100.0%
with
100.0%
intangible
100.0%
concepts
95.5%
like
99.6%
romance,
97.0%
love
100.0%
and
99.9%
connection.
100.0%
But
99.9%
uh,
80.3%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
purposes
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
100.0%
video,
100.0%
we're
99.5%
going
82.6%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
covering
100.0%
all
100.0%
kinds
100.0%
of
100.0%
ethical
99.6%
or
99.4%
consensual
100.0%
non
99.6%
monogamy
100.0%
or
97.7%
ENM
79.1%
m.
99.1%
So
99.5%
all
100.0%
types
84.0%
of
100.0%
ways
100.0%
that
100.0%
people
100.0%
might
100.0%
have
100.0%
relationships
100.0%
and
100.0%
connections
99.9%
outside
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
one
100.0%
on
99.7%
one
100.0%
exclusive
99.7%
sexual
99.9%
and
99.4%
romantic
99.9%
partnership.
99.8%
Polyamory
92.0%
is
100.0%
often
100.0%
thought
100.0%
of
99.9%
as
100.0%
a
99.7%
sort
99.7%
of
100.0%
catch
99.4%
all
89.6%
term.
99.6%
It's
99.9%
the
100.0%
reason
100.0%
why
99.9%
I
99.7%
used
99.8%
it
99.9%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
title.
99.8%
It's
99.9%
what
100.0%
most
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
99.9%
used
100.0%
to.
100.0%
But
99.9%
many
100.0%
people
100.0%
do
99.9%
make
100.0%
a
100.0%
distinction
99.9%
between
100.0%
being
99.9%
polyamorous
99.2%
and
91.5%
being
99.8%
sexually
99.4%
non
99.9%
monogamous,
100.0%
like
99.9%
being
99.9%
a
99.9%
swinger
99.9%
or
99.8%
being
99.4%
in
97.5%
a
70.5%
sexually
99.7%
open
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
The
100.0%
idea
100.0%
being
100.0%
that
99.9%
polyamory,
85.2%
as
99.9%
the
99.9%
name
100.0%
suggests,
99.9%
is
99.9%
about
100.0%
having
100.0%
many
99.9%
loves,
97.8%
that
99.7%
the
99.8%
multiple
100.0%
relationships
99.9%
need
99.7%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
a
99.9%
loving
100.0%
emotional
99.9%
connection
100.0%
as
100.0%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
them
99.9%
for
100.0%
it
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
polyamory.
100.0%
But
99.9%
again,
100.0%
because
100.0%
these
100.0%
are
100.0%
terms
99.9%
created
100.0%
to
100.0%
describe
100.0%
real
100.0%
life
100.0%
relationships
99.9%
and
100.0%
feelings,
99.4%
sometimes
100.0%
the
100.0%
edges
99.9%
of
99.8%
these
99.8%
definitions
99.7%
get
100.0%
a
100.0%
little
99.9%
bit
99.9%
blurry.
88.0%
For
99.9%
some
100.0%
people,
100.0%
these
100.0%
connections
99.8%
need
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
99.9%
specifically
87.4%
romantic
95.0%
to
100.0%
call
100.0%
them
99.8%
polyamory.
90.5%
But
99.9%
for
100.0%
others,
99.9%
romance
97.7%
itself
100.0%
is
100.0%
a
99.9%
subjective
100.0%
construct
100.0%
that
100.0%
doesn't
99.9%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
separated
100.0%
from
100.0%
a
100.0%
wider
99.9%
spectrum
88.1%
of
100.0%
connection.
100.0%
For
99.6%
some
100.0%
people,
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamy
98.7%
is
99.9%
about
100.0%
a
99.8%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
hierarchy,
96.7%
whereas
100.0%
for
99.7%
others
99.9%
there
100.0%
are
70.4%
still
99.9%
hierarchical
99.9%
structures
89.3%
to
100.0%
their
99.9%
relationships.
99.9%
But
99.8%
the
100.0%
wide
100.0%
range
100.0%
of
100.0%
attitudes,
85.2%
practices
80.4%
and
100.0%
desires
100.0%
that
99.8%
are
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
relationships
100.0%
outside
100.0%
of
98.1%
monogamy
100.0%
is
99.9%
at
99.9%
the
100.0%
heart
100.0%
of
100.0%
what
100.0%
we're
99.7%
going
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
99.9%
exploring
98.1%
today.
99.7%
In
99.9%
this
100.0%
video
100.0%
we're
99.8%
going
92.0%
to
100.0%
be
99.9%
asking
81.4%
what
99.9%
might
99.8%
poly
94.8%
and
99.4%
CNN
85.1%
representation
99.9%
tell
100.0%
us?
100.0%
Not
99.9%
just
99.5%
these
99.6%
relationships
100.0%
themselves,
100.0%
but
100.0%
also
100.0%
our
95.5%
wider
99.9%
cultural
100.0%
assumptions
100.0%
about
99.8%
love,
100.0%
sex
99.9%
and
99.9%
what
99.9%
it
100.0%
means
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
human.
100.0%
I
100.0%
just
99.9%
want
96.6%
to
52.6%
take
100.0%
a
100.0%
minute
100.0%
for
100.0%
a
100.0%
quick
100.0%
ad
76.3%
from
99.9%
today's
99.9%
sponsor,
98.9%
the
99.9%
Paired
97.6%
app.
98.4%
A
99.8%
relationship
100.0%
app
99.7%
that
99.9%
can
99.9%
help
100.0%
partners
99.9%
communicate
100.0%
and
100.0%
connect
100.0%
with
100.0%
daily
100.0%
conversation
99.5%
starters
99.9%
and
86.7%
advice
100.0%
from
100.0%
experts.
99.7%
There
99.8%
are
100.0%
quizzes,
89.4%
games
100.0%
and
56.2%
questions
100.0%
to
100.0%
fill
99.7%
in
99.9%
and
99.8%
share
99.9%
together
99.9%
about
99.9%
everything
100.0%
from
100.0%
vacations
99.8%
to
99.6%
finances,
100.0%
memories
100.0%
to
99.9%
future
100.0%
dreams.
99.7%
With
99.9%
their
87.5%
timeline
100.0%
feature,
100.0%
it
99.8%
focuses
100.0%
on
100.0%
nurturing
100.0%
existing
100.0%
relationships
89.3%
to
95.4%
help
100.0%
you
99.7%
strengthen
96.7%
your
99.9%
bond
100.0%
and
99.9%
stay
100.0%
in
100.0%
love
99.9%
with.
47.2%
Now,
99.7%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
have
100.0%
a
99.9%
romantic
95.0%
partner,
100.0%
so
100.0%
I
99.9%
asked
98.8%
my
100.0%
bestie
99.8%
Tasmin
86.4%
to
99.9%
join
100.0%
the
99.9%
uh
83.8%
app
100.0%
with
99.9%
me
100.0%
instead
98.9%
to
100.0%
try
100.0%
it
77.1%
out.
100.0%
And
99.6%
it's
99.8%
actually
99.8%
been
99.9%
really
99.8%
great
100.0%
for
99.9%
building
100.0%
on
99.4%
our
99.7%
communication
99.9%
in
100.0%
like
79.6%
a
99.9%
fun
100.0%
and
99.8%
casual
100.0%
way.
99.9%
Definitely
89.7%
feels
99.9%
like
99.7%
a
99.8%
great
100.0%
everyday
98.8%
way
99.9%
to
100.0%
check
100.0%
in
99.9%
purposefully
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
like
93.9%
serious
100.0%
intimidating
100.0%
ideas
99.8%
of
94.6%
big
100.0%
conversations
100.0%
with
99.8%
some
99.8%
like
89.3%
unspoken
100.0%
friction
100.0%
reaching
99.9%
crisis
99.9%
point
99.0%
for
99.0%
any
99.9%
couples
99.8%
in
99.9%
my
100.0%
audience
100.0%
who
99.0%
want
99.9%
to
99.5%
try
100.0%
it.
99.0%
You
100.0%
can
100.0%
click
100.0%
my
98.1%
link
100.0%
below
99.9%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
a
99.8%
7
100.0%
day
100.0%
free
99.9%
trial
96.4%
and
92.4%
25%
98.0%
off
99.2%
paired
96.7%
premium
81.1%
to
100.0%
deepen
100.0%
your
99.9%
connection
100.0%
with
99.9%
your
100.0%
partner.
100.0%
Also
98.6%
wanted
91.1%
to
100.0%
point
100.0%
out
100.0%
that
99.8%
although
99.9%
the
99.9%
app
100.0%
is
99.9%
built
100.0%
for
99.4%
one
99.8%
on
93.5%
romantic
100.0%
connections
99.9%
right
99.6%
now,
99.0%
when
100.0%
they
99.9%
first
100.0%
approached
98.5%
me
99.9%
I
100.0%
had
99.0%
a
98.0%
dig
99.8%
around
99.8%
their
99.9%
website
100.0%
and
100.0%
found
100.0%
in
99.9%
their
99.1%
FAQs
98.9%
that
99.0%
they
100.0%
are
99.6%
open
100.0%
to
100.0%
hearing
100.0%
from
100.0%
poly
87.0%
people
100.0%
about
100.0%
how
100.0%
the
99.9%
app
100.0%
might
100.0%
work
100.0%
for
100.0%
other
99.9%
dynamics
99.6%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
future
100.0%
and
98.8%
it
84.6%
felt
99.9%
like
99.4%
the
99.9%
kind
99.9%
of
99.7%
people
100.0%
watching
97.6%
this
100.0%
video
100.0%
might
99.9%
be
99.9%
exactly
100.0%
who
100.0%
they
100.0%
wanted
99.9%
to
100.0%
hear
100.0%
from.
100.0%
Alright,
93.1%
back
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
99.9%
video.
76.6%
The
95.6%
Tropes
99.0%
let's
99.9%
start
100.0%
this
99.9%
deep
100.0%
dive
99.9%
by
99.9%
looking
100.0%
at
99.9%
this
99.5%
intertwined
100.0%
polycule
96.2%
relationship
100.0%
map
100.0%
of
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamy
99.6%
tropes.
79.2%
The
99.7%
stereotypes,
95.1%
the
99.8%
storylines
98.2%
we
99.9%
see
100.0%
repeated
98.9%
over
100.0%
and
89.3%
over,
100.0%
the
99.9%
representation
99.9%
that
99.8%
doesn't
100.0%
necessarily
95.9%
feel
100.0%
all
99.5%
that
99.9%
authentic,
99.9%
but
54.6%
can
99.8%
tell
100.0%
us
99.9%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
about
100.0%
wider
99.8%
attitudes
91.6%
towards
99.6%
non
100.0%
monogamy.
99.8%
Start
99.9%
with
92.4%
Non
98.7%
monogamy
99.7%
is
99.8%
all
99.6%
about
100.0%
sex.
99.0%
In
99.9%
a
99.8%
world
94.1%
that
99.3%
valorizes
89.5%
the
99.9%
monogamous
99.1%
romantic
100.0%
relationship,
99.1%
particularly
99.9%
one
99.9%
between
100.0%
straight
99.9%
and
99.7%
CIS
98.9%
people,
100.0%
as
99.9%
the
100.0%
pinnacle
100.0%
of
100.0%
achievement,
99.8%
people
100.0%
who
100.0%
stray
94.5%
from
100.0%
that
100.0%
model
100.0%
pose
99.9%
a
100.0%
problem,
99.7%
especially
100.0%
when
100.0%
they
100.0%
are
100.0%
happy
100.0%
and
97.1%
fulfilled
91.0%
within
100.0%
their
100.0%
own
100.0%
version
100.0%
of
100.0%
life.
100.0%
When
100.0%
we
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
100.0%
equal
100.0%
marriage
100.0%
debates
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
2010s
97.1%
and
100.0%
beyond,
93.2%
the
100.0%
problem
100.0%
was
97.0%
gay
100.0%
couples,
100.0%
even
100.0%
those
99.8%
in
100.0%
romantic
98.6%
monogamous
99.9%
relationships.
99.4%
Because
100.0%
if
100.0%
they
100.0%
could
100.0%
be
100.0%
happy,
100.0%
then
99.0%
maybe
99.9%
the
100.0%
traditional
100.0%
good
100.0%
model
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.8%
relationship
100.0%
between
100.0%
one
100.0%
man
99.9%
and
100.0%
one
99.9%
woman
99.9%
wasn't
100.0%
the
100.0%
only
100.0%
option.
100.0%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
this
100.0%
is
100.0%
a
98.6%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.7%
reason
98.3%
reason
67.7%
why
100.0%
queerness
99.8%
is
100.0%
so
99.8%
sexualized
83.0%
by
100.0%
those
100.0%
in
100.0%
opposition
100.0%
to
100.0%
our
99.9%
equality.
99.3%
Because
99.5%
within
99.9%
a
99.7%
historically
100.0%
sex
99.9%
negative
100.0%
society
100.0%
which
99.8%
has
76.3%
proclaimed
99.3%
sexes
86.8%
to
99.8%
be
99.9%
primarily
91.2%
for
100.0%
procreation
85.3%
and
99.9%
only
100.0%
within
99.8%
marriage,
99.7%
the
99.9%
fastest
100.0%
way
100.0%
to
100.0%
devalue
100.0%
a
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
is
100.0%
to
100.0%
accuse
84.9%
it,
99.8%
uh,
90.8%
of
99.9%
being
100.0%
all
100.0%
about
100.0%
sex.
99.3%
It's
100.0%
a
100.0%
way
100.0%
to
100.0%
separate
100.0%
the
100.0%
othered
97.4%
from
100.0%
normal
100.0%
people
100.0%
who
100.0%
understand
100.0%
sexual
99.9%
relationships
100.0%
that
100.0%
are
100.0%
real
100.0%
and
96.7%
meaningful
93.9%
also
100.0%
have
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
romantic
95.4%
in
100.0%
nature.
100.0%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
the
99.9%
same
99.9%
impulse
100.0%
behind
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
attitudes
88.5%
towards
99.5%
non
99.3%
monogamy
99.1%
that
99.8%
to
100.0%
give
100.0%
into
88.6%
a
100.0%
kind
99.7%
of
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
that
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
one
100.0%
man
99.9%
and
97.6%
one
100.0%
woman,
99.7%
these
100.0%
people
100.0%
must
98.4%
have
83.1%
have
89.3%
unnatural
99.9%
appetites.
99.7%
It
99.8%
must
100.0%
be
100.0%
about
100.0%
greed
100.0%
or
100.0%
lust
100.0%
or
100.0%
other
99.9%
sinful
99.9%
temptations.
97.7%
I
100.0%
want
98.2%
to
100.0%
stress
100.0%
here
99.7%
as
100.0%
I
100.0%
go
100.0%
through
100.0%
some
100.0%
examples
100.0%
of
98.3%
this
99.9%
on
99.9%
screen,
99.6%
that
99.9%
relationships
99.9%
built
100.0%
around
100.0%
sex
99.8%
between
100.0%
consenting
100.0%
parties
100.0%
shouldn't
99.4%
be
100.0%
demonized
92.6%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
place.
99.9%
It
99.9%
isn't
96.1%
inherently
98.6%
wrong
100.0%
or
95.8%
even
100.0%
bad
100.0%
representation
100.0%
to
100.0%
portray
86.4%
a
99.9%
purely
99.9%
or
99.8%
primarily
100.0%
sexual
99.5%
poly
99.7%
relationship
100.0%
on
100.0%
screen,
85.2%
but
99.9%
uh,
96.0%
much
99.8%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
as
100.0%
these
99.9%
other
100.0%
tropes,
87.9%
we
99.9%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
look
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
99.6%
wider
100.0%
patterns.
98.6%
People
100.0%
don't
100.0%
know
100.0%
how
99.9%
to
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
sexual
73.5%
in
99.8%
a
100.0%
normal
99.9%
way.
100.0%
Like,
100.0%
people
100.0%
don't
100.0%
know
100.0%
how
100.0%
to
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
sex
99.2%
in
97.0%
the
99.9%
way
100.0%
that
99.9%
they
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
everything
100.0%
else.
100.0%
It
100.0%
has
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
this,
99.9%
like,
99.2%
super
100.0%
shameful,
100.0%
super
100.0%
secret
100.0%
kind
99.8%
of
100.0%
like,
98.4%
uh,
98.4%
you
98.9%
know,
100.0%
kind
99.6%
of
99.9%
the
71.7%
thing
100.0%
that
100.0%
you,
100.0%
like,
98.9%
giggle
100.0%
at.
99.8%
And
99.9%
that's
100.0%
kind
99.9%
of
100.0%
something
100.0%
that
100.0%
I
100.0%
see
100.0%
reflected
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
media
100.0%
as
100.0%
well.
99.8%
People
100.0%
who
100.0%
are,
56.8%
uh,
93.7%
like,
99.3%
are
99.2%
just
100.0%
embracing
98.7%
their
99.9%
sexuality,
99.9%
like
99.8%
enjoying
100.0%
themselves,
100.0%
not
100.0%
wanting
84.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
are,
98.7%
you
98.7%
know,
100.0%
either
99.9%
seen
99.8%
as
100.0%
like,
99.1%
indecisive
100.0%
or
100.0%
slutty
84.9%
or,
99.7%
you
98.6%
know,
99.9%
something
100.0%
bad
100.0%
happens
100.0%
to
100.0%
them
100.0%
to
100.0%
kind
98.7%
of
99.9%
punish
100.0%
them
100.0%
for
100.0%
their,
99.7%
you
83.4%
know,
100.0%
morality
93.9%
or
99.7%
whatever.
100.0%
Everyone's
100.0%
favourite
82.8%
sarcastic
100.0%
joker,
99.6%
Chandler
98.7%
in
99.7%
Friends
99.4%
had
99.7%
a
100.0%
brief
100.0%
brush
100.0%
with
100.0%
polyamory
99.9%
in
99.9%
one
99.9%
episode
99.7%
of
99.8%
the
99.9%
show,
100.0%
which
99.8%
brings
100.0%
up
100.0%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
ideas
99.4%
around
97.7%
polyamory
95.1%
as
99.9%
a
99.8%
highly
99.9%
sexual
100.0%
and
99.8%
hedonistic
96.3%
arrangement.
99.8%
Chandler
100.0%
starts
99.7%
dating
100.0%
a
100.0%
woman
99.9%
who
100.0%
has
99.9%
multiple
89.3%
partners,
100.0%
including
100.0%
a
79.8%
husband.
100.0%
At
100.0%
first
100.0%
it
99.8%
seems
100.0%
like
99.4%
this
99.3%
is
99.7%
a
100.0%
great
99.9%
option
100.0%
for
99.9%
him,
99.9%
as
99.9%
he
99.8%
excitedly
91.0%
explains,
94.0%
I
99.3%
get
99.7%
all
99.9%
the
99.9%
good
100.0%
stuff,
100.0%
all
99.0%
the
100.0%
fun,
100.0%
all
88.0%
the
100.0%
talking,
100.0%
all
93.8%
the
99.9%
sex
99.6%
and
99.9%
none
99.9%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
responsibility.
99.8%
I
99.9%
mean,
100.0%
this
100.0%
is
100.0%
every
100.0%
guy's
99.9%
fantasy.
100.0%
But
99.8%
he
99.7%
also
100.0%
begins
99.9%
to
100.0%
wonder
99.9%
why
100.0%
she
99.9%
needs
100.0%
all
99.9%
these
100.0%
other
100.0%
partners
100.0%
to
99.9%
question
100.0%
her
100.0%
abundant
99.4%
sexuality
99.9%
when
100.0%
as
99.8%
a
100.0%
woman,
100.0%
she's
86.4%
assumed
95.1%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
the
99.9%
one
99.9%
with
100.0%
the
89.2%
lower
99.9%
libido
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
99.8%
relationship.
100.0%
That
99.9%
gendered
100.0%
background
96.8%
idea
99.9%
around
100.0%
sex
99.6%
reflects
88.3%
back
100.0%
onto
85.4%
Chandler,
100.0%
calling
89.0%
into
99.8%
question
100.0%
his
100.0%
own
100.0%
masculinity.
93.4%
Why
99.9%
he
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
enough
100.0%
for
100.0%
her.
99.9%
Huh?
78.1%
He
99.8%
questions
99.9%
if
99.9%
she
99.9%
could
100.0%
or
99.3%
even
100.0%
should
100.0%
leave
100.0%
these
99.6%
other
99.9%
guys
100.0%
and
99.9%
be
99.9%
just
100.0%
with
100.0%
him.
99.8%
He's
86.3%
still
30.5%
threatened
100.0%
by
100.0%
her
99.8%
bringing
99.9%
in
99.6%
a
99.9%
new
100.0%
guy
100.0%
after
99.6%
him.
99.8%
The
99.8%
cultural
99.9%
norm
100.0%
of
99.9%
monogamy
96.7%
imposes
100.0%
on
99.9%
her
99.7%
character
84.4%
and
59.2%
her
99.8%
relationships
99.4%
so
99.9%
many
100.0%
judgements
86.3%
and
99.2%
ultimately
100.0%
comes
99.9%
back
100.0%
around
99.9%
to
97.6%
the
99.7%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
monogamy
100.0%
as
100.0%
the
99.8%
relationship
100.0%
type
99.7%
that
99.9%
works
99.9%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
long
100.0%
run.
99.8%
These
99.7%
insecurities
94.4%
of
99.8%
not
100.0%
being
100.0%
enough
100.0%
for
99.9%
a
99.9%
partner
100.0%
who
99.9%
is
99.8%
poly
99.8%
are,
99.8%
uh,
97.1%
to
99.4%
me,
100.0%
quite
99.8%
obviously
100.0%
socially
99.9%
constructed.
99.1%
You
99.9%
don't
99.9%
have
100.0%
more
99.2%
than
100.0%
one
99.8%
child
100.0%
because
99.9%
the
99.9%
first
100.0%
wasn't
99.9%
enough
100.0%
to
99.9%
satisfy
95.5%
your
99.9%
parental
100.0%
feelings
99.9%
or
99.2%
needs.
99.2%
You
99.2%
aren't
98.2%
expected
99.8%
to
99.9%
stick
100.0%
to
99.6%
one
100.0%
friend
100.0%
at
99.8%
a
99.9%
time
99.8%
in
99.4%
a
99.7%
platonic
100.0%
kind
99.0%
of
98.0%
monogamy
100.0%
because
99.2%
you
99.9%
should
99.9%
be
99.9%
enough
100.0%
for
99.9%
each
100.0%
other.
98.6%
It
100.0%
then
99.9%
also
100.0%
seems
100.0%
to
100.0%
suggest
100.0%
that
100.0%
poly
95.6%
people
100.0%
with
100.0%
multiple
87.4%
partners
100.0%
are,
100.0%
uh,
53.9%
both
99.9%
unable
100.0%
to
100.0%
provide
100.0%
for
97.8%
the
99.9%
way
100.0%
that
97.9%
they
100.0%
should
100.0%
for
100.0%
a
99.8%
partner,
100.0%
or
99.8%
they
99.7%
have
100.0%
unnatural
99.5%
appetites
99.9%
for
75.4%
sex,
99.6%
love
100.0%
or
99.8%
other
100.0%
needs
75.4%
which
99.7%
are
100.0%
impossible
100.0%
to
100.0%
satisfy.
99.0%
Another
100.0%
way
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
this
100.0%
manifest
97.8%
on
99.9%
screen
99.9%
is
99.9%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
often
100.0%
interlinked
99.9%
storylines
99.6%
of
100.0%
polyamory
95.0%
and
92.4%
cheating.
97.8%
You
91.1%
know,
99.9%
firstly
100.0%
it
100.0%
draws
100.0%
a
100.0%
link
100.0%
between
100.0%
polyamory
98.5%
and
81.6%
infidelity,
92.3%
which
99.8%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
is
100.0%
very
100.0%
disingenuous.
100.0%
Um,
98.5%
and
99.3%
secondly,
99.9%
it
99.9%
implies
99.9%
that
100.0%
all
99.9%
people
100.0%
who
99.9%
are
99.9%
non
99.3%
monogamous
99.0%
or
87.4%
polyamorous
99.9%
are
97.5%
failed.
98.3%
Were
99.8%
failed
100.0%
monogamists
99.9%
first.
100.0%
Um,
99.2%
you
99.1%
know,
100.0%
that
99.9%
they
100.0%
like,
99.0%
uh,
92.9%
couldn't
100.0%
do
100.0%
monogamy
100.0%
in
100.0%
some
100.0%
way
100.0%
or
100.0%
like
97.1%
were
90.9%
really
100.0%
bad
100.0%
at
100.0%
it
99.9%
or
100.0%
like,
99.1%
you
98.7%
know,
100.0%
uh,
93.9%
polyamory
99.2%
was
100.0%
like
97.9%
their
99.8%
last
100.0%
resort
78.1%
in
100.0%
some
100.0%
way.
100.0%
Um,
95.3%
or
99.4%
like
83.5%
a,
63.6%
like
97.7%
a,
89.2%
like
98.0%
a,
62.0%
like
96.2%
a
99.8%
saving
100.0%
grace
97.9%
for
100.0%
their
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
One
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
most
100.0%
well
100.0%
known
100.0%
shows
100.0%
about
100.0%
polyamory
91.3%
is
100.0%
yous
80.9%
Me
95.8%
her,
99.0%
where
99.8%
a
100.0%
couple,
100.0%
Emma
100.0%
and
100.0%
Jack,
100.0%
unable
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
a
100.0%
baby
100.0%
and
99.7%
with
100.0%
a
99.9%
lacking
100.0%
sex
99.8%
life,
100.0%
end
100.0%
up
100.0%
bringing
100.0%
in
99.9%
a
99.8%
third
100.0%
to
100.0%
their
99.8%
relationship,
87.1%
an
99.4%
escort
99.9%
named
100.0%
Izzy.
99.7%
The
99.9%
initial
99.7%
connection
100.0%
is
100.0%
between
100.0%
Izzy
89.6%
and
100.0%
Jack
99.9%
when
99.9%
Jack
100.0%
books
98.5%
a
99.7%
session
100.0%
with
99.9%
huh,
86.0%
her
77.7%
telling
99.9%
Emma,
99.7%
although
99.4%
Jack
99.7%
and
99.9%
Izzy
88.1%
don't
100.0%
have
100.0%
sex,
99.4%
they
100.0%
do
99.7%
talk,
100.0%
drink
99.6%
and
83.5%
make
100.0%
out
99.2%
during
100.0%
that
99.4%
first
100.0%
session.
100.0%
Although
100.0%
it
99.9%
was
100.0%
popular
100.0%
enough
100.0%
to
100.0%
run
100.0%
for
100.0%
five
100.0%
seasons,
99.9%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
poly
98.1%
people
100.0%
have
99.9%
talked
98.1%
about
100.0%
the
100.0%
limitations
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
show,
100.0%
seemingly
100.0%
portraying
90.6%
a
100.0%
realistic
100.0%
dynamic
100.0%
only
100.0%
insofar
85.5%
as
99.9%
it's
99.5%
realistic
100.0%
that
100.0%
some
99.9%
people
99.9%
go
100.0%
into
99.9%
non
99.9%
monogamy
97.3%
without
100.0%
really
100.0%
knowing
100.0%
anything
100.0%
about
100.0%
it
100.0%
and
100.0%
just
99.8%
sort
99.6%
of
100.0%
continue
99.8%
to
100.0%
bring
100.0%
their
95.1%
issues
99.9%
and
99.4%
toxicity
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
dynamic.
100.0%
As
99.3%
one
97.7%
Reddit
99.8%
users
80.2%
joked,
99.0%
I
99.9%
just
99.9%
want
100.0%
them
99.8%
to
100.0%
connect
100.0%
with
100.0%
their
95.1%
local
100.0%
poly
99.6%
community,
100.0%
maybe
99.9%
read
100.0%
a
100.0%
book.
100.0%
Izzy
98.4%
seems
100.0%
to
99.3%
be
100.0%
the
100.0%
only
100.0%
one
99.9%
that
99.5%
has
99.8%
done
100.0%
any
100.0%
homework.
100.0%
It
99.9%
seems
100.0%
to
96.0%
many
99.9%
to
100.0%
continue
100.0%
the
99.9%
dynamic
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
imperfect
99.4%
and
99.5%
the
99.7%
outsider.
95.4%
Third,
99.4%
with
100.0%
another
100.0%
Reddit
89.2%
user
100.0%
uh,
98.9%
concluding
90.1%
Jack
97.4%
and
56.2%
Emma
99.0%
have
99.9%
a
100.0%
terrible
100.0%
borderline
100.0%
toxic
99.6%
dynamic,
100.0%
like
99.6%
it's
99.7%
some
100.0%
kind
99.9%
of
100.0%
default
100.0%
that
99.5%
they're
98.9%
always
100.0%
treating
100.0%
Izzy
99.7%
as
99.8%
if
100.0%
she's
99.9%
secondary
100.0%
to
100.0%
their
99.7%
OG
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
They
100.0%
should
100.0%
be
100.0%
including
99.9%
her
99.8%
in
97.7%
conversations
99.6%
about
100.0%
the
99.8%
relationship
100.0%
and
59.2%
Izzy
99.7%
should
100.0%
be
100.0%
an
99.9%
equal
100.0%
partner,
100.0%
but
100.0%
they
99.9%
almost
99.9%
always
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
and
99.4%
to
99.9%
her,
99.9%
uh,
94.6%
like
100.0%
a
100.0%
child.
100.0%
We
100.0%
see
100.0%
another
100.0%
example
88.2%
of
100.0%
this
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
99.7%
episode
99.4%
Silver
99.9%
bells
98.1%
of
99.9%
Ally
96.3%
McBeal.
84.6%
The
99.7%
case
99.8%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
week
99.9%
involves
99.9%
a
100.0%
poly
99.8%
triad
85.0%
and
99.9%
runs
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
100.0%
polyamory
100.0%
is
100.0%
ultimately
100.0%
a
100.0%
version
85.4%
of
100.0%
cheating
92.5%
with
100.0%
one
99.5%
partner
99.8%
inevitably
99.9%
unhappy
100.0%
or
67.9%
unfulfilled
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
99.9%
arrangement,
100.0%
but
99.8%
being
100.0%
coerced
100.0%
into
100.0%
it
99.9%
or
99.9%
reluctantly
96.3%
agreeing
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
something
100.0%
that
99.6%
people
100.0%
might
100.0%
get
100.0%
into
99.9%
together
99.8%
enthusiastically.
98.6%
In
100.0%
the
99.9%
episode
100.0%
three
100.0%
people
100.0%
come
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
99.9%
judge
86.5%
looking
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
allowed
100.0%
a
100.0%
three
100.0%
way
100.0%
marriage
100.0%
license.
99.4%
Our
99.5%
lead
99.8%
Ali
76.9%
is
100.0%
uncomfortable
98.9%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
with
99.8%
being
99.9%
assigned
86.3%
the
99.5%
case
100.0%
and
99.9%
we
100.0%
quickly
100.0%
learn
94.7%
that
99.9%
this
99.5%
whole
100.0%
thing
100.0%
started
100.0%
with,
99.9%
you
99.1%
guessed
99.9%
it,
98.7%
an
99.7%
unhappy
100.0%
marriage.
98.1%
James,
94.3%
the
99.8%
man
100.0%
in
100.0%
this
99.8%
throuple
86.2%
was
100.0%
bored
99.9%
and
100.0%
unfulfilled
80.4%
in
100.0%
his
100.0%
marriage
84.4%
to
100.0%
Mindy
100.0%
until
100.0%
he
100.0%
met
100.0%
his
100.0%
new
100.0%
love
99.9%
Patty
91.5%
at
100.0%
work
100.0%
and
100.0%
began
100.0%
a
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
with
100.0%
her.
100.0%
Although
99.3%
they
100.0%
speak
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.8%
three
100.0%
way
99.9%
relationship,
100.0%
making
99.9%
them
87.0%
all
96.0%
feel
99.8%
closer
100.0%
emotionally
99.8%
as
99.9%
well
100.0%
as
99.7%
being
99.7%
practical
100.0%
help
99.8%
with
100.0%
child
99.9%
rearing
98.5%
and
95.3%
work
100.0%
schedules,
99.9%
ultimately
100.0%
the
100.0%
judge
85.1%
denies
100.0%
their
64.9%
request
100.0%
and
99.6%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
that,
100.0%
Mindy
100.0%
seems
100.0%
to
100.0%
agree
100.0%
with
62.2%
the
99.9%
judge
89.9%
as
99.8%
this
100.0%
being
100.0%
the
100.0%
right
99.9%
thing
100.0%
seemingly
100.0%
exposing
96.8%
reluctance
84.4%
within
99.9%
a
100.0%
well
99.9%
functioning
99.9%
poly
76.0%
relationship
100.0%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
outside.
100.0%
Throughout
100.0%
the
100.0%
episode,
98.1%
our
99.2%
leading
100.0%
lady
100.0%
affirms
84.8%
monogamy
100.0%
as
100.0%
the
100.0%
right
100.0%
choice
100.0%
and
59.2%
feels
95.7%
sorry
100.0%
for
100.0%
Mindy
99.9%
and
99.5%
her
99.9%
partner's
98.8%
legal
100.0%
cheating.
99.8%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
we
100.0%
also
100.0%
see
100.0%
the
95.9%
sexualized
94.1%
and
97.4%
moralized
93.8%
idea
99.7%
of
99.2%
polyamory
88.2%
in
100.0%
the
99.9%
ways
99.7%
that
99.7%
it
99.9%
mirrors
99.8%
other
100.0%
existing
100.0%
tropes,
96.5%
the
99.7%
depraved
99.9%
bisexual
99.9%
being
99.9%
an
99.8%
obvious
99.8%
one
100.0%
to
99.2%
me.
98.8%
From
99.9%
Sharon
100.0%
Stone's
99.5%
Katherine
78.0%
Trummell
94.8%
in
99.6%
Basic
99.9%
Instinct
99.9%
to
100.0%
Matt
99.9%
Damon's
99.9%
Tom
99.7%
Ripley
100.0%
in
99.7%
the
99.7%
Talented
99.8%
Mr.
99.9%
Ripley,
99.4%
their
99.5%
devious
100.0%
seductive
100.0%
power
100.0%
knows
100.0%
no
100.0%
limits.
99.9%
If
100.0%
you
100.0%
want
94.6%
to
100.0%
create
99.9%
a
99.9%
character
99.4%
who
99.8%
breaks
100.0%
the
100.0%
laws
99.9%
of
99.9%
morality
100.0%
through
100.0%
violence,
92.6%
theft
97.7%
or
98.7%
manipulation,
95.0%
you
97.9%
know
100.0%
what?
97.8%
Why
99.9%
not
100.0%
also
99.1%
have
99.8%
them
100.0%
break
100.0%
unspoken
100.0%
cultural
100.0%
laws
99.8%
as
98.6%
well?
99.7%
President
99.9%
Frank
99.9%
Underwood
100.0%
in
99.8%
House
100.0%
of
100.0%
Cards,
99.5%
whose
99.9%
body
100.0%
count
100.0%
grows
100.0%
exponentially
99.3%
with
99.2%
each
99.7%
season,
100.0%
is
99.8%
a
99.9%
classic
100.0%
example
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
non
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
villain.
97.4%
He
99.9%
and
100.0%
his
100.0%
wife
100.0%
Claire
83.4%
have
99.9%
multiple
100.0%
other
99.9%
sexual
99.0%
partners
100.0%
outside
100.0%
their
99.9%
marriage.
100.0%
We
99.7%
can
99.4%
see
94.3%
be
99.0%
an
99.9%
aspect
99.6%
of
100.0%
the
99.5%
characters
100.0%
which
99.8%
when
99.9%
viewed
99.8%
through
99.8%
the
99.9%
lens
84.1%
of
99.8%
mononormativity
86.6%
would
99.5%
emphasize
84.4%
their
99.9%
self
100.0%
serving
97.3%
and
75.5%
ambitious
90.5%
natures.
99.5%
Similarly,
100.0%
the
100.0%
character
100.0%
of
100.0%
Judy
99.5%
King
100.0%
in
95.6%
Orange
99.9%
is
99.8%
the
93.0%
New
99.9%
Black
99.9%
gives
99.9%
us
99.7%
a
99.9%
poly
97.5%
character
99.1%
whose
100.0%
immorality
95.1%
is
100.0%
often
100.0%
linked
100.0%
to
100.0%
her
99.8%
non
99.5%
monogamy.
96.3%
She
99.9%
uses
100.0%
sex
99.9%
as
99.9%
a
100.0%
weapon
100.0%
of
99.7%
blackmail
97.7%
and
99.5%
a
99.0%
payment
100.0%
for
99.5%
favors,
82.2%
and
99.9%
seems
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
a
99.9%
transactional
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
with
100.0%
other
99.9%
people
100.0%
in
99.8%
the
99.9%
show,
99.1%
being
99.9%
accused
100.0%
of
100.0%
keeping
100.0%
them
100.0%
around
99.9%
for
98.4%
her
99.9%
own
100.0%
pleasure
100.0%
and
99.9%
amusement.
100.0%
And
98.5%
this
100.0%
perfectly
98.3%
connects
85.4%
with
99.9%
some
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
most
99.9%
negative
100.0%
attitudes
89.6%
towards
89.3%
polyamorous
98.0%
people,
98.7%
painting
100.0%
them
100.0%
as
99.9%
fundamentally
94.1%
selfish,
87.2%
pursuing
98.8%
whatever
100.0%
pleasure
99.5%
they
99.7%
wish,
100.0%
without
100.0%
responsibilities
99.0%
or
100.0%
care
100.0%
for
100.0%
others.
100.0%
And
99.9%
then
100.0%
we
100.0%
come
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
mountain
99.9%
of
99.9%
evidence
100.0%
of
99.9%
our
99.9%
sexualizing
97.6%
framing
100.0%
of
99.3%
polyamory
92.0%
that
99.5%
is
98.3%
horny
99.9%
reality
100.0%
dating
99.9%
shows.
99.9%
The
100.0%
obvious
99.6%
examples
99.9%
are
96.6%
those
100.0%
shows
100.0%
that
100.0%
focus
100.0%
around
99.9%
non
99.9%
monogamy
99.7%
as
100.0%
their
99.4%
premise.
100.0%
Let
99.9%
me
100.0%
introduce
93.9%
you
100.0%
to
99.1%
Couple
86.1%
to
97.7%
Throuple.
91.5%
It's
99.7%
a
100.0%
reality
100.0%
dating
100.0%
show
100.0%
about,
99.9%
I
99.5%
mean
100.0%
exactly
100.0%
what
100.0%
it
100.0%
sounds
100.0%
like.
99.6%
The
98.5%
show
100.0%
asks
99.6%
if
100.0%
you
100.0%
were
99.6%
given
100.0%
the
99.9%
chance
100.0%
at
96.6%
non
99.6%
monogamy
98.8%
in
98.7%
paradise,
100.0%
what
100.0%
would
100.0%
you
100.0%
say?
99.9%
A
99.9%
group
100.0%
of
100.0%
four
100.0%
couples
99.9%
is
99.7%
shown
99.9%
an
99.9%
array
100.0%
of
100.0%
sexy
99.9%
singles
90.8%
ready
100.0%
to
100.0%
dive
96.2%
into
100.0%
their
99.9%
relationship
100.0%
and
99.9%
um,
69.3%
by
99.9%
that
100.0%
the
99.9%
show
99.9%
means
98.9%
into
99.7%
their
99.7%
bed.
99.9%
The
99.9%
choice
100.0%
of
100.0%
hosting
99.9%
the
86.6%
show
99.9%
in
46.9%
a
98.8%
tropical
100.0%
paradise
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
just
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.0%
fantasy
100.0%
isolation.
99.8%
It's
99.9%
also
100.0%
so
99.9%
all
99.9%
the
99.8%
singles
99.9%
can
99.8%
be
100.0%
wearing
100.0%
bikinis
100.0%
and
99.9%
swim
100.0%
shorts
99.9%
as
100.0%
much
100.0%
as
100.0%
possible.
100.0%
The
99.8%
trailer
100.0%
marketing
99.9%
the
99.6%
show
100.0%
has
100.0%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
night
100.0%
goggle
86.6%
style
97.4%
shots
100.0%
of,
99.9%
uh,
86.7%
bed
88.8%
sheets
99.6%
and
99.8%
body
100.0%
parts
100.0%
before
100.0%
the
99.9%
host
100.0%
quips
75.3%
that
99.3%
they'll
85.3%
be
99.9%
giving
100.0%
them
99.9%
a
99.8%
bed
99.8%
big
99.8%
enough
100.0%
for
99.9%
three.
99.9%
And
99.5%
the
99.5%
montage
98.1%
of
100.0%
shots
99.9%
starts
100.0%
including
99.7%
daylight
97.1%
shots
100.0%
of
100.0%
these
99.6%
throuples
88.6%
making
100.0%
out,
100.0%
grinding
94.5%
and
100.0%
generally
76.5%
pushing
87.4%
the
100.0%
boundaries
100.0%
of
100.0%
airable
75.3%
heavy
100.0%
petting
99.8%
at
99.8%
all
100.0%
times
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
day.
99.9%
They
99.8%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
having
99.9%
uncontrollable
99.7%
boners
79.2%
surrounded
100.0%
by
100.0%
all
99.9%
of
99.1%
these
99.9%
hot
98.1%
people
98.8%
people
68.8%
like.
96.7%
Very
99.9%
clearly
100.0%
this
98.5%
show
100.0%
is
99.7%
selling
100.0%
the
99.9%
idea
100.0%
that
99.8%
the
99.9%
appeal
79.6%
of
100.0%
a
99.8%
throuple
99.2%
is
99.4%
sex.
98.9%
Although
100.0%
the
98.7%
show
99.8%
emphasizes
91.1%
that,
99.8%
uh,
97.4%
it
53.1%
includes
91.8%
an
99.7%
expert
98.8%
to
100.0%
help
100.0%
them
100.0%
along
100.0%
the
100.0%
way.
100.0%
The
100.0%
reality
100.0%
show
99.9%
format
100.0%
means
100.0%
that
99.6%
the
100.0%
way
100.0%
that
99.3%
these
99.8%
conversations
100.0%
around
99.9%
boundaries
100.0%
and
99.9%
explorations
99.9%
of
99.9%
comfort
100.0%
levels
100.0%
are
99.8%
often
100.0%
being
99.8%
discovered
100.0%
is
99.3%
through
99.6%
sexy
82.5%
group
100.0%
challenges
98.5%
designed
99.9%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
honestly
99.9%
the
100.0%
best
100.0%
or
99.6%
worst.
94.5%
In
99.1%
this
100.0%
case,
99.7%
reaction
99.9%
shots
100.0%
of
99.9%
upset,
100.0%
angry
100.0%
and
99.9%
jealous
100.0%
partners.
100.0%
The
100.0%
emotional
90.2%
aspects
100.0%
of
100.0%
compatibility
100.0%
in
99.8%
the
99.2%
show
100.0%
are
100.0%
often
100.0%
tied
100.0%
to
100.0%
sexual
99.9%
connection.
98.9%
Not
99.9%
just
99.9%
us
58.7%
that
99.9%
you
99.9%
need
99.6%
to
99.8%
both
99.9%
have
100.0%
a
99.9%
spark
99.6%
with
100.0%
the
99.4%
single
100.0%
being
100.0%
invited
100.0%
into
99.8%
your
99.8%
couple,
99.9%
but
99.4%
also
99.9%
the
99.4%
jealousy
91.2%
or
95.7%
feeling
99.5%
or
57.2%
the
99.2%
resentment
100.0%
is
100.0%
often
100.0%
tied
98.6%
to
100.0%
watching
100.0%
sexual
99.8%
intimacy
100.0%
between
100.0%
your
100.0%
partner
100.0%
and
100.0%
the
81.6%
single
100.0%
person.
100.0%
Other
100.0%
reality
100.0%
shows
100.0%
exploring
99.6%
non
99.9%
monogamy
98.8%
have
100.0%
fallen
100.0%
into
100.0%
a
99.9%
similarly
100.0%
sex
99.7%
heavy
100.0%
format.
98.7%
The
99.8%
UK
100.0%
show
100.0%
Open
96.2%
House
91.2%
the
99.6%
Great
100.0%
Sex
99.3%
Experiment
100.0%
being
99.9%
another
99.5%
such
100.0%
example.
100.0%
It
99.8%
again
99.7%
starts
100.0%
with
100.0%
couples
99.9%
wanting
82.6%
to
100.0%
explore
100.0%
opening
100.0%
up
99.7%
their
99.9%
relationship.
99.5%
They're
91.4%
taken
99.9%
to
100.0%
a
99.9%
sexually
99.7%
liberating
84.3%
retreat
100.0%
hosted
99.0%
by
100.0%
a
62.1%
polyamorous
92.4%
couple
100.0%
and
99.9%
a
99.9%
therapist
100.0%
to
99.1%
help
100.0%
them
100.0%
on
100.0%
their
99.8%
journey.
100.0%
Channel
100.0%
4
100.0%
seems
99.2%
to
100.0%
equate
95.2%
polyamorous
60.4%
polyamory
96.7%
with
99.2%
the
99.6%
purely
97.9%
sexual.
99.5%
In
99.8%
their
99.9%
own
100.0%
press
100.0%
releases
99.9%
and
99.8%
applications
99.9%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
show,
99.5%
they
99.5%
describe
99.6%
it
99.9%
as
77.7%
following
100.0%
previously
99.9%
monogamous
100.0%
couples
100.0%
as
99.8%
they
95.8%
experiment
93.9%
in
99.6%
open
100.0%
sexual
99.8%
relationships
99.9%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
time
99.9%
in
99.9%
an
99.9%
attempt
100.0%
to
100.0%
see
100.0%
if
99.9%
monogamy
100.0%
is
100.0%
an
99.9%
outdated
100.0%
concept
100.0%
in
100.0%
modern
100.0%
relationships.
99.9%
There's
99.9%
nothing
100.0%
wrong
100.0%
with
100.0%
this
100.0%
kind
99.9%
of
100.0%
non
99.8%
monogamy,
99.9%
which
100.0%
is
100.0%
specifically
93.9%
tied
99.7%
to
100.0%
an
99.8%
expansion
100.0%
of
100.0%
sexual
99.7%
intimacy.
100.0%
But
83.4%
the
100.0%
application
99.9%
for
99.9%
the
99.9%
show
100.0%
seems
100.0%
to
100.0%
also
100.0%
suggest
100.0%
that
99.9%
it
99.6%
isn't
100.0%
sex
99.7%
specific,
99.9%
saying
95.8%
each
99.9%
couple
91.7%
get
99.8%
the
99.9%
opportunity
100.0%
to
100.0%
meet
100.0%
and
88.0%
date
100.0%
the
99.8%
retreat's
97.1%
residents.
95.2%
Using
100.0%
the
100.0%
word
99.6%
date
90.5%
in
99.8%
particular
100.0%
connected
100.0%
to
100.0%
ideas
100.0%
of
99.7%
dating
100.0%
and
86.7%
romance
99.4%
over
100.0%
a
99.9%
purely
95.8%
sexual
99.9%
connection.
77.9%
And
99.5%
yet
99.9%
in
99.9%
the
99.8%
same
100.0%
form
99.9%
it
99.4%
says
97.8%
it
97.1%
is
67.8%
a
99.2%
social
100.0%
experiment
99.1%
television
88.3%
series
100.0%
where
100.0%
committed
99.9%
couples
100.0%
come
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
100.0%
luxury
100.0%
retreat
100.0%
to
100.0%
test
100.0%
whether
99.9%
opening
78.1%
up
99.9%
their
100.0%
Relationships
99.9%
and
100.0%
having
100.0%
sex
99.6%
with
100.0%
other
99.9%
people
100.0%
will
99.9%
strengthen
99.0%
their
99.9%
bond.
100.0%
It's
99.9%
a
100.0%
messy
100.0%
indistinction
97.6%
that
100.0%
I
99.7%
think
100.0%
comes
99.9%
from
100.0%
the
99.9%
many
100.0%
ways
100.0%
that
99.7%
sex
99.9%
and
100.0%
romance
99.7%
are
99.7%
seen
100.0%
as
100.0%
inextricably
100.0%
linked
100.0%
in
99.8%
our
100.0%
society.
100.0%
And
99.4%
it's
91.7%
not
100.0%
just
100.0%
what's
85.4%
on
100.0%
screen,
99.9%
but
99.9%
what's
98.5%
left
60.4%
left
100.0%
out.
100.0%
Which
99.9%
can
100.0%
tell
100.0%
us
100.0%
something
100.0%
about
100.0%
these
96.1%
sexualized
93.2%
attitudes
99.3%
to
99.9%
polyamory
89.0%
in
99.9%
modern
100.0%
society.
99.1%
There
99.8%
is,
100.0%
across
99.9%
almost
100.0%
all
100.0%
poly
99.7%
representation,
99.8%
a
100.0%
total
100.0%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
polyamorous
93.0%
parents
100.0%
and
100.0%
families.
99.9%
Even
100.0%
people
100.0%
who
100.0%
might
100.0%
consider
100.0%
themselves
100.0%
fairly
96.4%
liberal
100.0%
and
99.9%
open
100.0%
seem
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
this
100.0%
mental
100.0%
block
100.0%
when
100.0%
it
100.0%
comes
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
polyamory
98.0%
around
100.0%
children.
99.2%
The
99.9%
idea
99.9%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
triad
85.3%
or
99.8%
polycule
81.4%
where
100.0%
one
100.0%
or
99.9%
more
100.0%
of
99.9%
those
100.0%
involved
100.0%
is
99.8%
a
73.8%
parent,
99.0%
there's
99.5%
something
100.0%
that
100.0%
feels
100.0%
to
99.8%
many
100.0%
people
100.0%
instinctively
100.0%
icky
99.3%
about
100.0%
it.
88.1%
It's
97.7%
so
100.0%
similar
99.9%
to
100.0%
that
99.8%
same
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
99.8%
I've
99.9%
seen
100.0%
around
100.0%
gay
99.8%
marriage.
90.1%
How
99.9%
can
100.0%
we
99.9%
explain
99.5%
to
97.0%
kids
99.8%
they
99.7%
shouldn't
99.9%
be
100.0%
exposed
100.0%
to
100.0%
that
100.0%
lifestyle?
99.7%
The
100.0%
answer's
90.3%
the
100.0%
same.
99.7%
Right?
98.4%
Just
99.9%
because
99.9%
gay
100.0%
anal
99.1%
sex
100.0%
gives
100.0%
you
100.0%
the
99.8%
homophobic
99.9%
heebie
99.2%
jeebies,
98.6%
Carol,
99.2%
it
59.1%
doesn't
100.0%
mean
100.0%
that
99.6%
gay
100.0%
parents
99.7%
are
83.5%
any
99.9%
more
99.6%
likely
100.0%
to
100.0%
tell
100.0%
their
100.0%
kids
100.0%
about
100.0%
their
100.0%
sex
99.0%
lives
100.0%
than
87.8%
straight
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
99.5%
to
99.9%
tell
100.0%
theirs
99.3%
about
100.0%
their
99.6%
unfulfilling
100.0%
missionary
100.0%
sex.
99.7%
Poly
77.8%
relationships
99.9%
might
100.0%
be
100.0%
unusual
100.0%
family
100.0%
setups,
99.7%
but
100.0%
it's
99.7%
just
100.0%
as
100.0%
easy
100.0%
to
100.0%
explain
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
100.0%
kid
100.0%
as
99.3%
divorce
92.9%
and
99.7%
step
99.9%
parents
79.6%
or
99.9%
relatives
99.9%
raising
100.0%
other
99.9%
relatives,
85.0%
children,
100.0%
or
100.0%
any
100.0%
number
100.0%
of
100.0%
other
100.0%
configurations.
99.9%
Kids
100.0%
don't
100.0%
know
100.0%
cultural
100.0%
norms
99.9%
until
100.0%
they're
97.4%
taught
100.0%
them,
99.8%
and
99.6%
so
99.8%
don't
100.0%
know
100.0%
something
100.0%
is
62.1%
unusual
100.0%
until
100.0%
they're
99.6%
told
100.0%
that
95.7%
either.
99.3%
And
99.4%
it
99.8%
isn't
100.0%
just
100.0%
that
99.8%
representations
99.8%
of
98.2%
polyamory
94.4%
are
99.7%
sexualized.
89.0%
It's
99.3%
that
99.8%
this
99.9%
sexualization
97.6%
is
99.9%
so
100.0%
widespread
99.1%
as
99.9%
an
100.0%
attitude
86.9%
that
99.8%
it
99.6%
seems
100.0%
like
99.3%
it's
99.8%
affecting
84.2%
the
99.9%
way
100.0%
that
97.6%
we
99.9%
see
100.0%
non
99.9%
sexualized
88.3%
poly
99.7%
relationships
100.0%
when
99.7%
they're
99.6%
presented
100.0%
on
100.0%
screen.
99.9%
I
99.9%
read
89.2%
an
100.0%
article
100.0%
on
99.9%
polyamory
100.0%
on
99.8%
screen
99.8%
and
99.8%
this
100.0%
quote
98.4%
stuck
99.9%
out
100.0%
to
100.0%
me.
97.4%
I
99.9%
see
100.0%
examples
88.4%
of
100.0%
this
100.0%
trope
91.0%
in
98.1%
works
99.9%
like
99.8%
Scott
99.9%
Pilgrim
99.9%
vs.
92.6%
The
99.2%
World,
99.6%
where
99.9%
Scott's
99.7%
roommate
83.8%
Wallace
91.1%
Wells
98.1%
is
99.7%
in
100.0%
a
99.9%
loosely
100.0%
defined
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
with
100.0%
two
99.9%
other
100.0%
men.
100.0%
Or
99.7%
Sensei,
94.8%
where
99.3%
the
99.8%
act
91.4%
of
100.0%
connection
100.0%
is
99.9%
often
100.0%
depicted
100.0%
as
100.0%
big,
100.0%
joyous
99.8%
Screwfox
75.9%
guests.
78.3%
Because,
99.8%
yes,
98.8%
the
99.7%
show
99.7%
sensei
92.3%
does
100.0%
have
99.9%
some
99.9%
iconic
99.7%
sensual
99.4%
scenes,
100.0%
but
99.9%
it
99.7%
also
100.0%
has
100.0%
romantic,
95.4%
platonic
100.0%
and
99.7%
familial
99.3%
relationships.
99.9%
Alongside
99.6%
the
99.2%
show
100.0%
is
99.9%
a
100.0%
modern
100.0%
sci
99.8%
fi
99.9%
classic
100.0%
about
100.0%
a
100.0%
group
100.0%
of
100.0%
eight
99.9%
strangers
99.9%
around
100.0%
the
100.0%
world
100.0%
who
96.6%
suddenly
98.9%
become
99.9%
mentally
100.0%
connected.
99.4%
They
99.9%
can
100.0%
inhabit
100.0%
each
100.0%
other's
99.9%
bodies,
99.8%
feel
100.0%
each
100.0%
other's
99.8%
emotions,
99.0%
use
100.0%
each
100.0%
other's
99.9%
skills
100.0%
and
99.9%
languages.
98.6%
They
99.7%
form
100.0%
this
99.9%
intense
100.0%
emotional
90.2%
connection
94.0%
and
99.6%
they
100.0%
also
99.9%
share
100.0%
this
99.9%
unique
100.0%
bodily
99.9%
connection
100.0%
too.
94.5%
A
99.6%
character
100.0%
experiences
99.4%
another's
94.0%
PMS
98.7%
and
99.5%
there
100.0%
are
100.0%
a
99.9%
number
100.0%
of
100.0%
times
100.0%
that
98.5%
they
97.6%
they
97.1%
feel
98.7%
feelings
99.9%
of
99.9%
pleasure
100.0%
and
99.8%
arousal
100.0%
simultaneously
100.0%
too.
98.8%
But
99.9%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
think
100.0%
that
99.3%
this
100.0%
diminishes
94.6%
the
99.9%
representation.
97.0%
The
99.9%
show
100.0%
has
99.8%
a
99.8%
lead
99.9%
who
100.0%
has
100.0%
polyamorous
95.1%
parents.
99.5%
It
99.9%
has
100.0%
a
100.0%
gay
100.0%
male
99.9%
couple
100.0%
who
100.0%
end
100.0%
up
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
99.9%
complex
76.7%
and
83.5%
loving
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
with
100.0%
a
99.9%
straight
99.9%
woman.
99.8%
The
100.0%
finale
99.9%
ends
100.0%
with
100.0%
a
99.9%
fan
100.0%
favourite
80.0%
love
100.0%
triangle
92.6%
being
99.9%
resolved
83.3%
with
100.0%
all
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
100.0%
being
99.9%
together
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
triad.
92.2%
Throughout
100.0%
the
100.0%
series,
100.0%
the
100.0%
pressures
99.7%
of
100.0%
tradition
100.0%
have
99.9%
had
99.9%
the
100.0%
woman
100.0%
Carla
94.3%
mentally
100.0%
warring
79.9%
between
100.0%
the
85.3%
socially
100.0%
respectable
99.8%
husband
100.0%
Rajan
97.0%
and
100.0%
the
100.0%
mysterious
89.8%
criminal
100.0%
she
100.0%
is
98.8%
now
99.9%
connected
100.0%
to,
98.1%
Wolfgan.
91.1%
But
99.9%
the
99.9%
writers
99.8%
decided
100.0%
at
99.6%
the
100.0%
end
100.0%
to
100.0%
acknowledge
93.7%
the
100.0%
authenticity
100.0%
of
99.9%
her
100.0%
love
100.0%
for
99.8%
both
100.0%
of
99.8%
them.
97.0%
The
99.9%
way
100.0%
that
97.0%
that
100.0%
love
100.0%
might
100.0%
bring
100.0%
those
99.5%
two
99.9%
men
100.0%
closer
100.0%
as
99.9%
they
100.0%
find
100.0%
connection
100.0%
in
99.9%
their
100.0%
joint
99.5%
feelings
99.9%
for
99.9%
her
100.0%
and
99.8%
the
100.0%
casual
99.6%
meh,
69.9%
why
99.7%
not
99.8%
of
96.9%
these
99.8%
guys
100.0%
deciding
99.0%
that
98.4%
they
99.8%
should
100.0%
try
99.9%
being
99.9%
in
100.0%
a
99.9%
romantic
100.0%
and
99.8%
sexual
99.7%
relationship
100.0%
with
99.9%
each
100.0%
other
100.0%
as
100.0%
well
99.9%
as
99.9%
with
99.4%
her.
99.9%
Sex
99.9%
is
100.0%
a
98.6%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
most
100.0%
romantic
98.0%
relationships.
100.0%
And
70.6%
yet
94.1%
the
99.6%
sexualised
86.0%
view
98.7%
of
97.7%
polyamory
100.0%
means
100.0%
that
99.8%
portrayals
99.9%
of
100.0%
sex
99.9%
within
99.8%
a
99.9%
romantic
100.0%
poly
87.7%
context
99.2%
on
99.8%
screen
99.5%
seem
100.0%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
viewed
100.0%
as
99.9%
overwhelmingly
88.3%
sexual.
82.1%
Non
99.7%
monogamy
97.8%
is
99.8%
just
100.0%
a
100.0%
phase.
99.7%
Ha.
83.3%
Uh,
98.2%
this
99.9%
old
98.1%
classic,
99.6%
any
100.0%
expression
100.0%
of
100.0%
sexuality
99.9%
or
99.9%
gender
99.8%
outside
100.0%
of
99.9%
strict
81.1%
norms
99.9%
seems
100.0%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
hit
100.0%
with
99.9%
this
99.7%
idea
100.0%
that
100.0%
it
95.7%
is
99.7%
a
100.0%
temporary
85.4%
mistake.
100.0%
And
99.3%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
this
100.0%
in
99.9%
a
99.9%
very
99.7%
meta
99.5%
way
100.0%
baked
100.0%
into
100.0%
a
100.0%
whole
99.9%
bunch
100.0%
of
100.0%
TV
99.9%
shows.
100.0%
With
99.9%
the
98.9%
way
100.0%
that
98.8%
poly
82.0%
storylines
98.2%
are
99.9%
often
100.0%
one
99.1%
off
99.1%
arcs,
99.5%
even
99.9%
relegated
100.0%
to
100.0%
individual
100.0%
episodes.
99.5%
It's
98.3%
literally
88.4%
temporary
86.5%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
lives
100.0%
of
100.0%
characters
98.7%
and
99.9%
the
99.8%
experience
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
audience.
99.9%
Procedural
100.0%
shows
100.0%
are
100.0%
based
100.0%
around
99.9%
one
100.0%
off
98.0%
characters
99.9%
and
99.8%
plots
99.9%
with
99.9%
the
97.8%
mystery
99.9%
solved
92.5%
or
99.8%
antagonist
97.9%
defeated
100.0%
in
99.9%
a
99.8%
tight
100.0%
60
100.0%
minutes.
97.0%
Max
100.0%
iZombie,
98.6%
for
99.7%
example,
100.0%
has
100.0%
an
99.9%
episode
88.3%
around
99.9%
the
100.0%
death
99.9%
of
100.0%
a
100.0%
painter.
99.9%
At
99.7%
first
100.0%
they
100.0%
think
100.0%
his
100.0%
wife
100.0%
killed
100.0%
him
100.0%
because
100.0%
he
99.9%
was
99.9%
having
100.0%
an
100.0%
affair,
100.0%
but
99.9%
uh,
93.0%
it's
99.9%
revealed
98.2%
that
99.8%
the
99.7%
wife
100.0%
knew
100.0%
about
100.0%
her
100.0%
husband's
99.9%
lovers.
99.9%
However,
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
99.9%
being
100.0%
a
99.9%
twist
99.7%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
trope
99.5%
of
99.8%
polyamory
100.0%
as
79.5%
not
99.9%
real
99.8%
or
99.9%
sustainable,
100.0%
they
99.9%
reveal
98.9%
that
99.2%
she
99.9%
is
99.9%
the
99.9%
murderer
100.0%
after
100.0%
all.
100.0%
And
67.9%
it
99.8%
was
100.0%
motivated
99.9%
by
100.0%
jealousy.
100.0%
But
99.4%
it
100.0%
wasn't
100.0%
jealousy
99.7%
because
100.0%
he
100.0%
was
99.9%
with
100.0%
someone
100.0%
else,
100.0%
but
99.9%
because
99.9%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
his
100.0%
lovers
100.0%
was
100.0%
pregnant,
99.5%
even
99.7%
though
100.0%
he
99.5%
declared
80.0%
claim
82.4%
to
97.9%
never
100.0%
want
99.9%
children.
100.0%
Even
100.0%
this
99.9%
pair
100.0%
of
100.0%
bohemian
99.6%
artists
76.5%
that
99.7%
claim
100.0%
to
99.8%
be
100.0%
okay
99.4%
with
100.0%
their
96.6%
open
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
couldn't
100.0%
make
100.0%
it
100.0%
work
100.0%
because
99.7%
one
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
99.9%
had
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
99.9%
feeling
99.9%
normal
98.0%
emotions
91.8%
of
100.0%
resentment
100.0%
and
99.9%
jealousy.
100.0%
Right?
98.9%
This
99.9%
is
100.0%
the
100.0%
end
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
one
99.9%
off
99.9%
glimpse
100.0%
into
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
representation.
99.9%
And
67.9%
therefore
100.0%
that's
99.9%
where
99.9%
the
99.9%
topic
100.0%
is
99.9%
left
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
and
83.5%
for
99.9%
the
100.0%
audience.
100.0%
The
100.0%
short
100.0%
lived
76.2%
nature
100.0%
of
100.0%
some
100.0%
storylines
99.3%
mean
98.7%
that
100.0%
even
100.0%
when
99.7%
the
85.4%
representation
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
overtly
99.6%
critical
100.0%
or
98.4%
negative,
100.0%
they
99.9%
still
100.0%
aren't
100.0%
seen
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
wider
100.0%
world
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
or
99.9%
for
99.9%
the
99.9%
audience
79.6%
as
97.2%
something
100.0%
other
100.0%
than
100.0%
one
99.9%
of
76.6%
oddity.
99.7%
The
99.8%
Boston
91.7%
Legal
99.8%
episode
99.7%
Word
95.9%
Salad
99.3%
Days
94.3%
includes
99.9%
the
99.9%
case
99.9%
of
99.3%
A
77.7%
and
98.0%
his
99.9%
two
99.9%
wives
99.9%
where
99.5%
although
99.9%
a
99.9%
judge
100.0%
rules
96.6%
against
100.0%
the
100.0%
legality
100.0%
of
100.0%
his
99.8%
marriage
100.0%
to
100.0%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
one
99.9%
woman,
99.8%
the
100.0%
three
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
100.0%
seem
100.0%
to
99.9%
have
100.0%
a
99.8%
healthy
100.0%
and
99.2%
balanced
99.9%
dynamic.
99.9%
The
99.9%
story
100.0%
ends
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
100.0%
original
79.5%
married
99.9%
couple
100.0%
agreeing
100.0%
to
100.0%
divorce
99.8%
to
99.9%
ensure
99.9%
an
99.0%
equality
99.9%
between
99.9%
the
99.9%
three
100.0%
of
99.5%
them.
99.9%
The
98.6%
show
100.0%
doesn't
99.9%
undermine
100.0%
their
99.7%
relationship,
99.9%
but
99.8%
it's
99.7%
also
99.9%
not
100.0%
something
100.0%
that's
99.5%
allowed
99.8%
to
99.9%
be
99.9%
part
99.8%
of
100.0%
ongoing
100.0%
plots
99.6%
or
99.8%
legitimized
97.0%
by
99.7%
being
99.6%
something
99.3%
that's
99.4%
part
99.8%
of
100.0%
the
99.7%
main
100.0%
characters
85.6%
storylines
97.4%
either.
98.2%
However,
100.0%
we
100.0%
do
99.7%
also
99.9%
see
100.0%
a
99.8%
similar
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
99.9%
polyamory
96.3%
as
99.9%
a
99.8%
temporary
99.5%
dalliance
91.4%
in
99.7%
longer
81.1%
plots.
89.8%
Too
97.1%
many
100.0%
viewers
99.8%
have
99.9%
criticised
82.8%
the
99.9%
L
98.6%
Word
71.3%
reboot's
98.3%
handling
100.0%
of
99.8%
Alice's
98.7%
poly
92.1%
storyline.
99.5%
The
99.0%
show
100.0%
iconically
99.6%
centers
81.0%
around
99.9%
the
99.9%
lives
99.8%
of
100.0%
a
99.5%
group
100.0%
of
99.9%
lesbians
90.6%
and
99.4%
as
99.7%
uh
85.7%
such
100.0%
is
99.6%
arguably
100.0%
poised
94.6%
to
100.0%
explore
100.0%
issues
99.9%
of
100.0%
gender,
99.3%
sexuality
99.9%
and
83.5%
romance
98.8%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
other
99.8%
mainstream
100.0%
shows.
99.9%
Yet
99.8%
the
100.0%
messy
100.0%
connections
99.6%
between
100.0%
Alice
96.5%
girlfriend
99.6%
Nat
97.6%
and
100.0%
Nat's
99.8%
ex
100.0%
wife
99.3%
Gigi
94.5%
have
99.7%
become
99.9%
a
99.8%
source
97.0%
of
99.9%
frustration
100.0%
for
100.0%
some
99.9%
audience
100.0%
members.
99.9%
The
99.9%
whole
100.0%
thing
100.0%
begins
99.9%
with
77.7%
a
100.0%
drunken
100.0%
threesome
98.6%
and
99.9%
season
100.0%
one
100.0%
ends
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
95.9%
throuple
90.0%
breaking
100.0%
up
100.0%
in
100.0%
favour
75.6%
of
100.0%
Alice
78.1%
and
99.7%
Nat
99.9%
together
100.0%
monopoly
58.6%
monogamously.
96.1%
Except
100.0%
then
99.7%
in
100.0%
season
100.0%
two
100.0%
we
99.9%
get
99.9%
a
99.9%
continuation
100.0%
of
99.9%
this
99.3%
story
99.9%
as
99.9%
Nat
99.9%
realizes
87.4%
that
98.5%
she
99.9%
wants
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
in
99.9%
a
99.9%
poly
83.6%
relationship
100.0%
after
99.7%
all
99.8%
and
99.3%
Alice
85.3%
tries
100.0%
to
100.0%
make
100.0%
it
100.0%
work,
100.0%
but
99.9%
ultimately
100.0%
they
99.9%
break
100.0%
up.
99.8%
Now
99.5%
there's
99.9%
nothing
100.0%
inherently
87.4%
wrong
99.9%
with
99.9%
portraying
99.7%
this
99.9%
trajectory.
99.6%
I'm
98.1%
sure
100.0%
it
99.8%
rings
99.9%
true
100.0%
to
99.8%
some
99.9%
viewers.
100.0%
Even
95.2%
the
99.7%
frustration
100.0%
came
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
99.5%
way
100.0%
that
95.8%
the
99.3%
story
100.0%
was
99.9%
handled
100.0%
on
99.9%
screen,
99.4%
or
99.8%
rather
100.0%
wasn't
100.0%
handled.
99.0%
The
99.6%
decision
100.0%
to
100.0%
open
100.0%
up
98.6%
their
99.9%
relationship
100.0%
in
100.0%
season
100.0%
two
100.0%
isn't
99.9%
shown.
99.9%
As
99.9%
one
100.0%
critic
100.0%
pointed
76.6%
out
99.9%
about
100.0%
the
99.7%
breakup
99.2%
episode
99.9%
Luck
95.6%
Be
99.6%
a
99.1%
Lady.
96.8%
The
99.7%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
character
100.0%
development
100.0%
between
100.0%
then
99.9%
and
100.0%
now
100.0%
makes
100.0%
it
100.0%
difficult
100.0%
to
100.0%
see
100.0%
this
100.0%
as
93.2%
anything
100.0%
other
99.9%
than
100.0%
empty
100.0%
fun
18.7%
forced
95.4%
conflict,
97.9%
especially
100.0%
given
100.0%
how
100.0%
badly
100.0%
last
99.8%
episode
99.9%
bungled
99.9%
the
99.9%
conversation
100.0%
too,
97.1%
with
99.8%
Nat
97.5%
throwing
100.0%
out
99.9%
casually
99.8%
biphobic
99.5%
remarks
100.0%
and
99.8%
Alice
88.8%
conflating
99.7%
polyamory
97.0%
with
99.9%
cheating.
92.8%
Here
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
polyamory
99.3%
being
100.0%
used
100.0%
as
99.9%
a
99.9%
temporary
99.9%
plot
100.0%
device
99.1%
to
100.0%
cause
100.0%
conflict
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
something
100.0%
to
99.9%
be
99.9%
authentically
100.0%
explored.
99.9%
This
99.9%
phase
96.0%
attitude
100.0%
towards
99.3%
polyamory
100.0%
is
99.9%
also
99.7%
evident
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
99.7%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
older
99.9%
polyamorous
95.0%
representation
99.4%
by
99.7%
relegating
99.9%
to
99.8%
the
99.5%
world
100.0%
of
99.8%
youthful
100.0%
folly
99.8%
and
99.9%
Immature
99.9%
states.
99.8%
This
87.7%
is
99.2%
implication
99.9%
that
100.0%
polyamory
99.3%
is
99.9%
something
99.9%
that
96.3%
older
100.0%
people
99.9%
will
99.8%
inevitably
100.0%
have
97.1%
left
99.9%
behind.
100.0%
It
99.9%
feels
100.0%
like
100.0%
dating
98.7%
reality
100.0%
shows
100.0%
about
99.9%
polyamorous
99.7%
people
100.0%
would
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.8%
clear
100.0%
opportunity
99.9%
to
100.0%
include
100.0%
older
100.0%
contestants
93.3%
in
99.9%
comparison
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
99.7%
monogamous
96.2%
alternative
100.0%
shows.
99.9%
After
99.9%
all,
99.9%
you
100.0%
can't
88.3%
argue
100.0%
that
99.9%
older
100.0%
people
100.0%
should
100.0%
already
100.0%
have
100.0%
found
100.0%
love
100.0%
to
100.0%
exclude
100.0%
them
99.9%
from
100.0%
production.
99.9%
And
99.4%
these
99.9%
are
100.0%
not
100.0%
people
100.0%
who
100.0%
are
99.7%
necessarily
100.0%
subscribing
86.3%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
one
100.0%
on
55.7%
one
99.9%
love
99.9%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
place.
100.0%
And
99.6%
yet,
99.6%
if
100.0%
I
100.0%
use
98.6%
the
100.0%
example
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
polyamorous
88.2%
dating
100.0%
show
100.0%
I
99.9%
talked
100.0%
about
100.0%
earlier
99.2%
couple
94.6%
to
95.8%
throuple,
96.5%
they're
93.8%
all
99.9%
young
100.0%
people.
100.0%
And
86.7%
yet,
29.7%
yes,
99.6%
I
99.9%
am
96.2%
aware
95.8%
that
99.8%
young
99.9%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
cool
99.6%
and
53.1%
hot
99.8%
and
99.9%
they
98.9%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
make
100.0%
sure
100.0%
that
98.1%
the
99.5%
ages
99.9%
line
100.0%
up
99.6%
so
99.9%
it's
99.8%
age
100.0%
appropriate
99.9%
for
100.0%
any
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
couples
100.0%
to
100.0%
pair
100.0%
with
100.0%
any
99.9%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
singles.
81.1%
But
99.7%
arguably,
100.0%
letting
99.5%
18
100.0%
year
99.9%
olds
99.6%
onto
99.2%
internationally
98.9%
broadcast
100.0%
dating
100.0%
shows
100.0%
is
99.7%
the
97.8%
weirder
97.1%
decision
99.8%
here.
99.2%
This
99.7%
idea
90.9%
of
100.0%
polyamory
99.8%
as
99.9%
a
99.9%
phase
77.2%
is
100.0%
also
100.0%
included
100.0%
in
100.0%
shows
100.0%
where
99.8%
rejecting
99.9%
polyamory
97.5%
is
99.9%
used
100.0%
to
99.9%
kind
95.8%
of
67.9%
express
100.0%
real
99.8%
commitment
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
99.9%
singular
100.0%
partner.
99.7%
The
99.8%
idea
100.0%
that
99.9%
being
99.9%
serious
100.0%
and
99.9%
official
99.9%
is
100.0%
dictated
100.0%
entirely
100.0%
by
56.7%
cutting
99.3%
off
99.6%
all
100.0%
other
99.9%
romantic
99.8%
prospects
100.0%
and
89.3%
partners.
100.0%
And
99.6%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
familiar
93.3%
with
100.0%
this
100.0%
idea
100.0%
in
100.0%
their
100.0%
own
99.9%
monogamous
99.9%
dating
100.0%
lives
98.7%
that
99.3%
you
100.0%
might
100.0%
be
100.0%
going
100.0%
on
99.6%
dates
100.0%
with
100.0%
multiple
98.7%
people
100.0%
for
100.0%
a
99.3%
while
100.0%
and
100.0%
then
99.8%
stop
100.0%
dating
100.0%
all
99.9%
but
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
them
100.0%
when
100.0%
you
100.0%
decide
100.0%
that
98.9%
they
100.0%
are
99.9%
like
96.2%
the
99.8%
one
100.0%
that
98.2%
you
99.9%
want
100.0%
to
100.0%
pursue.
100.0%
But
99.7%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
real
100.0%
world,
100.0%
this
100.0%
most
99.9%
often
100.0%
happens
100.0%
reasonably
97.2%
early
100.0%
in
100.0%
that
99.6%
process.
100.0%
Yes,
99.9%
it's
99.9%
time
100.0%
to
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about
100.0%
love
100.0%
is
100.0%
Blind
99.9%
that
99.5%
I
100.0%
hinted
99.9%
at
100.0%
the
99.9%
beginning
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
99.9%
video.
97.0%
It's
99.9%
a
100.0%
reality
100.0%
show
100.0%
where
100.0%
contestants
85.3%
spend
99.2%
a
100.0%
handful
100.0%
of
100.0%
weeks
100.0%
cut
100.0%
off
99.9%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
rest
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
world,
100.0%
relentlessly
99.7%
going
100.0%
on
56.2%
down
32.7%
dates.
90.1%
These
99.3%
dates
99.7%
are
100.0%
hosted
100.0%
in
99.9%
so
99.8%
called
100.0%
pods,
93.3%
meaning
100.0%
that
98.8%
they
99.9%
are
99.9%
one
100.0%
on
99.9%
one,
99.8%
but
99.9%
the
99.7%
two
100.0%
people
100.0%
on
99.9%
the
99.9%
date
99.8%
can't
100.0%
see
100.0%
each
100.0%
other
100.0%
while
100.0%
the
99.9%
date
99.9%
is
100.0%
happening.
100.0%
The
99.9%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
69.2%
show
100.0%
is
99.9%
asking
88.9%
whether
100.0%
these
100.0%
people
100.0%
can
99.9%
fall
99.9%
for
99.9%
someone's
100.0%
personality
100.0%
and
99.8%
what's
100.0%
inside
100.0%
them,
100.0%
and
99.7%
then
99.8%
when
100.0%
they
100.0%
see
100.0%
them
100.0%
and
86.7%
spend
100.0%
time
100.0%
with
100.0%
them
99.9%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
outside
100.0%
world,
100.0%
if
100.0%
they're
88.8%
willing
100.0%
to
100.0%
marry
100.0%
them
100.0%
six
100.0%
weeks
100.0%
later.
99.9%
It's
99.9%
classic
100.0%
straight
96.7%
people
99.9%
protecting
100.0%
the
100.0%
sanctity
97.3%
of
100.0%
marriage
100.0%
stuff.
100.0%
The
100.0%
producers
100.0%
of
99.9%
Love
99.6%
is
100.0%
Blind
99.7%
have
99.9%
created
100.0%
a
100.0%
show
100.0%
where
100.0%
quite
95.2%
often
100.0%
people
100.0%
fall
100.0%
in
100.0%
love
100.0%
with
100.0%
multiple
93.1%
people
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
time.
99.8%
Every
100.0%
season
100.0%
we
100.0%
have
100.0%
these
100.0%
contestants
100.0%
who
100.0%
are
100.0%
ready
100.0%
to
100.0%
marry
90.8%
either
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
99.2%
two,
99.9%
sometimes
99.7%
even
96.3%
three
100.0%
people
100.0%
that
98.8%
they
99.9%
have
99.9%
been
100.0%
simultaneously
100.0%
dating
99.7%
and
75.5%
falling
99.9%
for
100.0%
by
100.0%
the
100.0%
end
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
99.8%
time
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
pods.
85.3%
And
99.6%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
of
95.3%
these
100.0%
people
100.0%
End
100.0%
up
100.0%
seeming
100.0%
desperate
98.6%
for
99.9%
that
100.0%
decision
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
taken
100.0%
out
100.0%
of
99.9%
their
100.0%
hands
99.9%
because
99.2%
they
100.0%
cannot
100.0%
separate
100.0%
their
100.0%
feelings
100.0%
for
74.4%
the
100.0%
two
100.0%
people.
99.8%
Oftentimes
95.0%
they
99.9%
love
100.0%
them
100.0%
for
100.0%
different
100.0%
reasons.
100.0%
They
100.0%
connect
100.0%
with
100.0%
them
99.9%
in
100.0%
different
100.0%
ways,
100.0%
but
99.9%
they
99.9%
have
100.0%
a
99.9%
similar
100.0%
level
100.0%
of
100.0%
intimacy,
100.0%
romantic
94.8%
feelings
99.9%
towards
99.7%
two
100.0%
or
99.8%
more
100.0%
different
100.0%
people.
100.0%
They
99.8%
kind
99.4%
of
99.6%
want
100.0%
those
100.0%
people
100.0%
to
100.0%
choose
100.0%
for
53.1%
them.
100.0%
Often
100.0%
it
100.0%
seems
100.0%
like
100.0%
they
100.0%
really
100.0%
hope
100.0%
that
99.6%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
them
99.9%
who
99.8%
also
99.9%
is
100.0%
dating
100.0%
someone
100.0%
else,
100.0%
that
99.7%
that
100.0%
person
100.0%
will
100.0%
propose
100.0%
and
99.9%
then
99.8%
they'll
99.3%
default,
99.6%
be
99.1%
like,
99.0%
oh,
99.5%
okay,
99.8%
you're
99.8%
the
100.0%
person
100.0%
that
99.3%
I'm
85.4%
actually
99.9%
going
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
marrying.
77.4%
Because
99.8%
they
98.7%
find
100.0%
it
100.0%
so
100.0%
hard
100.0%
to
100.0%
decide
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
one.
99.9%
They
100.0%
are
99.9%
so
100.0%
close
100.0%
to
100.0%
acknowledging
93.6%
polyamory
93.2%
as
89.2%
a
82.6%
legitimate
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
dynamic
100.0%
in
100.0%
this
99.7%
show.
100.0%
But
99.8%
instead,
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
over
100.0%
the
100.0%
course
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
season
100.0%
the
100.0%
intense
100.0%
hold
72.2%
that
88.9%
monogamy
100.0%
has
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
99.6%
show
100.0%
itself
100.0%
and
100.0%
those
100.0%
participating
100.0%
in
100.0%
it.
99.9%
Obviously,
100.0%
the
100.0%
format
99.5%
ending
99.9%
in
99.4%
marriage
100.0%
is
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
that,
99.9%
but
99.9%
also
100.0%
the
65.1%
dismissal
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.7%
feelings
99.9%
for
99.8%
multiple
91.7%
people.
98.7%
The
100.0%
idea
98.1%
that
100.0%
having
100.0%
deep
99.8%
romantic
99.7%
connections
99.9%
with
100.0%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
one
100.0%
person
100.0%
at
100.0%
a
99.9%
time
100.0%
is
100.0%
an
100.0%
insult
100.0%
to
100.0%
those
100.0%
people
100.0%
and
98.8%
it
100.0%
can't
100.0%
be
100.0%
real.
99.9%
That
99.6%
a
100.0%
choice
100.0%
has
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
made
100.0%
more
98.4%
than
100.0%
that,
99.9%
that
99.7%
the
100.0%
only
100.0%
legitimate
100.0%
and
97.7%
true
83.3%
way
100.0%
of
100.0%
being
100.0%
in
100.0%
love
100.0%
is
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
someone
100.0%
choose
99.7%
you
100.0%
and
100.0%
only
100.0%
you.
100.0%
There
99.8%
have
98.0%
been
100.0%
multiple,
95.0%
especially
100.0%
women
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
97.8%
show
100.0%
who
100.0%
are
100.0%
intensely
100.0%
emotional
97.4%
and
97.9%
committed
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
99.9%
they
100.0%
want
100.0%
someone
100.0%
who
100.0%
chooses
91.2%
them.
99.8%
That
92.6%
that
99.9%
is
100.0%
the
100.0%
real
100.0%
marker
99.8%
of
100.0%
love.
99.8%
I
99.8%
think
100.0%
with
100.0%
reality
100.0%
shows,
100.0%
it's
99.5%
so,
99.7%
uh,
98.7%
like
99.7%
you
100.0%
said,
100.0%
it
99.9%
lays
99.9%
bare
91.2%
the
100.0%
pressure
100.0%
cooker
100.0%
of
94.0%
the.
92.4%
Of
97.9%
the
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
escalator.
99.8%
We
99.9%
got
99.5%
to
59.2%
do
100.0%
it.
99.9%
We
100.0%
got
98.0%
to
81.7%
do
99.9%
it
100.0%
fast.
100.0%
I
99.3%
got
99.3%
to
79.5%
figure
100.0%
out
99.5%
in
99.6%
10
100.0%
days
99.9%
who
97.6%
I'm
99.4%
about
100.0%
to
100.0%
marry.
91.7%
I
93.2%
mean,
100.0%
talk
100.0%
about,
100.0%
like,
62.2%
it
99.7%
feeding
100.0%
capital
97.9%
because
78.2%
it's
99.9%
like,
90.4%
for
99.8%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
and
99.8%
for.
98.2%
To
99.7%
make
100.0%
money
100.0%
and
99.5%
stuff.
99.9%
And
96.7%
so
99.8%
there's
98.2%
producers
95.4%
actually
99.5%
literally
99.9%
pressuring
99.9%
them.
100.0%
But
99.2%
it's,
92.3%
um,
99.9%
I
99.2%
think
100.0%
it,
56.2%
it
73.1%
you
99.9%
see
100.0%
people,
100.0%
like,
92.0%
almost
100.0%
feel
99.9%
heartbroken
91.9%
that
99.9%
they
100.0%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
choose
99.8%
not
99.9%
just
99.9%
chooses
96.9%
them,
99.8%
but
100.0%
chooses
88.6%
them
99.9%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
exclusion
99.4%
of
100.0%
all
100.0%
others.
100.0%
In
100.0%
fictional
100.0%
media,
100.0%
this
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
99.9%
polyamory
98.7%
as
99.9%
a
99.6%
phase
88.2%
is
100.0%
strengthened
86.9%
by
100.0%
storylines
95.5%
which
100.0%
use
100.0%
it
100.0%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
realization
97.9%
of
100.0%
a
99.7%
character's,
99.7%
like,
89.3%
true
100.0%
feelings
76.5%
for
100.0%
one
100.0%
person.
99.8%
This
99.9%
might
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
100.0%
couple
100.0%
trying
100.0%
to
100.0%
fix
100.0%
or
99.9%
save
98.2%
an
58.2%
exist
93.0%
existing
99.5%
relationship
100.0%
through
96.6%
an
100.0%
open
100.0%
marriage,
100.0%
a
99.6%
love
100.0%
triangle
86.4%
storyline,
99.8%
or
99.9%
a
99.9%
single
89.9%
person
100.0%
who
100.0%
tries
99.9%
polyamory
100.0%
only
99.9%
to
100.0%
realize
81.8%
that,
99.8%
uh,
87.3%
they
99.7%
actually
99.8%
only
99.7%
want
100.0%
one
100.0%
person
100.0%
after
99.9%
all.
99.7%
A
100.0%
pretty
100.0%
clear
100.0%
example
99.6%
of
100.0%
this
100.0%
is
99.8%
the
99.9%
romance
100.0%
movie
99.8%
newness,
97.4%
released
98.7%
in
99.9%
2017.
100.0%
Initially
100.0%
leads
67.4%
Martin
99.5%
and
99.9%
Gabriella
96.6%
get
99.8%
together,
100.0%
but
99.9%
descend
99.8%
into
99.9%
jealousy,
100.0%
self
100.0%
doubt
98.7%
and
100.0%
paranoia.
100.0%
Gabriella
98.8%
grows
99.9%
suspicious
100.0%
of
99.8%
like
92.4%
photos
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
mysterious
100.0%
girl
99.9%
in
98.7%
Martin's
87.1%
parents
75.6%
house
100.0%
which
99.9%
turn
99.5%
out
99.8%
to
99.9%
be
99.5%
his
99.7%
dead
99.7%
sister,
100.0%
and
99.9%
sees
99.9%
him
100.0%
like
79.8%
not
100.0%
mentioning
99.9%
his
100.0%
mother's
99.9%
dementia
100.0%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
sign
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
95.7%
failure
100.0%
in
99.9%
their
99.9%
relationship
99.9%
and
98.1%
intimacy
100.0%
too.
98.7%
They
99.9%
argue
100.0%
and
89.3%
um,
78.6%
both
99.9%
end
99.9%
up
99.8%
cheating
98.5%
on
98.7%
each
100.0%
other.
100.0%
And
99.7%
their
99.4%
solution
100.0%
to
100.0%
this
100.0%
is
94.9%
oh,
99.4%
we'll
99.6%
make
100.0%
it
99.9%
an
100.0%
open
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
As
100.0%
if
100.0%
that's
100.0%
going
74.2%
to
100.0%
help
100.0%
them
100.0%
deal
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
100.0%
issues
99.7%
that
99.9%
they
99.9%
already
100.0%
had
99.6%
of
100.0%
jealousy
100.0%
and
99.9%
self
99.9%
doubt
92.7%
and
88.2%
paranoia.
100.0%
It
99.8%
obviously
100.0%
doesn't
99.8%
work.
99.7%
They
99.7%
break
99.9%
up
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
97.8%
dealing
99.7%
with
100.0%
the
100.0%
original
100.0%
issues
99.9%
between
100.0%
them.
99.9%
The
100.0%
movie
100.0%
ends
100.0%
with
100.0%
them
99.9%
dramatically
93.8%
declaring
99.7%
their
99.9%
love
100.0%
for
100.0%
each
100.0%
other
100.0%
and
99.9%
how
100.0%
they
100.0%
were
100.0%
never
100.0%
really
100.0%
into
100.0%
the
99.9%
open
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
thing
99.9%
and
99.5%
that's
97.7%
happily
98.3%
ever
100.0%
after.
100.0%
We
100.0%
can
99.7%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
overwhelmingly
92.7%
there's
99.9%
this
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
polyamory
95.6%
being
100.0%
doomed
100.0%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
start.
99.5%
That
97.7%
the
100.0%
ultimate
100.0%
reason
100.0%
that
99.8%
it's
100.0%
a
100.0%
phase
99.8%
is
99.9%
because
100.0%
it
100.0%
can't
100.0%
stand
100.0%
the
100.0%
test
100.0%
of
100.0%
time.
95.7%
Time.
98.9%
It's
100.0%
fundamentally
99.8%
broken.
100.0%
And
99.8%
when
100.0%
we
100.0%
have
100.0%
so
100.0%
few
100.0%
portrayals
99.9%
of
100.0%
healthy
100.0%
polydynamics,
95.8%
it's
99.9%
understandable
100.0%
that
100.0%
the
99.9%
mass
100.0%
of
85.2%
individual
100.0%
examples
100.0%
of
100.0%
polyamory
96.6%
gone
100.0%
wrong
100.0%
seem
100.0%
to
100.0%
give
100.0%
the
99.9%
message
100.0%
that
100.0%
it's
99.9%
something
100.0%
that
100.0%
will
99.9%
always
100.0%
fail
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
it
99.7%
being
100.0%
not
100.0%
right
100.0%
for
100.0%
those
99.9%
specific
100.0%
characters
100.0%
in
100.0%
that
100.0%
particular
100.0%
storyline.
99.1%
Non
99.9%
monogamy
99.4%
is
99.9%
crazy.
99.4%
There
100.0%
are
97.4%
some
100.0%
representations
99.9%
of
100.0%
non
99.8%
monogamy
100.0%
which
99.9%
don't
99.9%
have
100.0%
it
100.0%
there
99.9%
specifically
94.8%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
phase,
99.8%
but
99.9%
only
100.0%
because
100.0%
they're
98.2%
pointing
100.0%
out
100.0%
that
100.0%
these
99.9%
characters
97.5%
will
100.0%
never
100.0%
be
100.0%
mature
99.9%
or
99.9%
sane
78.6%
or
99.9%
normal
100.0%
enough
100.0%
to
100.0%
grow
100.0%
out
100.0%
of
99.9%
it.
99.8%
That
93.8%
it
99.9%
stems
99.9%
from
100.0%
maladaptive
99.8%
coping
100.0%
mechanisms
100.0%
or
99.8%
psychological
99.9%
trauma.
99.7%
British
99.9%
TV
99.9%
drama
100.0%
Wanderlust
96.5%
involves
100.0%
a
99.6%
couple
100.0%
both
99.6%
having
99.9%
affairs
100.0%
and
99.9%
then
99.7%
deciding
84.9%
an
99.8%
open
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
is
92.3%
the
99.8%
way
100.0%
to
100.0%
solve
100.0%
their
99.9%
marital
100.0%
issues.
99.7%
The
97.0%
show
100.0%
was
99.5%
notorious
100.0%
for
100.0%
its
99.7%
numerous
100.0%
sex
99.8%
scenes.
100.0%
But
99.8%
the
100.0%
ultimate
100.0%
message
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
show
100.0%
comes
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
form
100.0%
of
100.0%
an
100.0%
episode
83.8%
long
99.6%
therapy
100.0%
session
100.0%
where
99.9%
we
100.0%
learn
98.1%
that
99.8%
the
99.9%
main
100.0%
character
99.1%
Joy's
87.0%
sexual
99.8%
promiscuity
100.0%
is
99.7%
actually
99.7%
more
100.0%
m
59.3%
of
99.2%
a
99.8%
self
100.0%
destructive
88.0%
coping
100.0%
mechanism
100.0%
brought
97.9%
on
99.3%
by
100.0%
trauma.
86.0%
The
99.9%
couple
100.0%
are
99.4%
reunited
98.0%
full
100.0%
circle
99.9%
by
100.0%
the
100.0%
end
100.0%
and
99.8%
we're
96.3%
kind
98.6%
of
99.3%
led
98.0%
to
100.0%
assume
99.9%
that
98.9%
this
99.9%
has
97.5%
all
99.9%
been
100.0%
a
99.9%
fun
100.0%
journey
100.0%
of
99.6%
a
99.8%
lesson
100.0%
that's
99.7%
now
99.6%
in
58.2%
the
50.0%
their
99.3%
past.
99.6%
The
99.9%
root
99.6%
of
100.0%
polyamory
92.6%
has
100.0%
been
100.0%
uncovered
100.0%
and
98.2%
the
99.9%
recovery
100.0%
looks
100.0%
like
100.0%
monogamy.
100.0%
We
100.0%
also
100.0%
see
100.0%
polyamory
98.1%
being
100.0%
used
100.0%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
sign
100.0%
of
100.0%
like
88.0%
a
99.9%
fear
100.0%
of
82.7%
commitment
100.0%
or
100.0%
some
100.0%
other
100.0%
psychological
100.0%
deficit
100.0%
that
100.0%
means
100.0%
that
99.6%
they
99.9%
can't
100.0%
be
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
normal
100.0%
or
100.0%
healthy
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
Sometimes
100.0%
this
100.0%
is
100.0%
explicit
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
script
100.0%
too.
96.6%
Characters
100.0%
literally
100.0%
say
100.0%
it
99.5%
in
100.0%
the
99.7%
show
99.9%
Degrassi.
83.8%
One
99.9%
couple,
76.5%
Jack
99.7%
and
99.8%
Imogen
86.3%
initially
100.0%
agree
100.0%
to
99.9%
a
99.5%
kind
98.7%
of
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
arrangement
98.7%
after
100.0%
Imogen
85.6%
confesses
100.0%
her
99.9%
love
100.0%
for
100.0%
Jack
99.4%
and
99.2%
Jack
99.2%
says
93.8%
I
99.4%
don't
99.2%
know,
100.0%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
we
99.9%
should
100.0%
break
100.0%
up.
99.8%
I
99.9%
didn't
100.0%
really
100.0%
see
100.0%
that
38.1%
this
98.3%
is
69.0%
exclusive,
99.0%
not
100.0%
looking
100.0%
for
100.0%
a
98.0%
monogamous
99.9%
thing,
100.0%
asking
100.0%
if
100.0%
Imogen
90.6%
knows
100.0%
about
100.0%
polyamory.
98.3%
But
99.9%
very
100.0%
soon
100.0%
after
100.0%
Jack
97.1%
confesses
100.0%
that
100.0%
she
100.0%
only
100.0%
said
100.0%
that
99.2%
she
100.0%
didn't
100.0%
love
100.0%
Imogen
99.5%
and
100.0%
wanted
100.0%
to
100.0%
try
100.0%
polyamory
89.8%
because
100.0%
she
100.0%
was
100.0%
actually
100.0%
scared
100.0%
of
100.0%
commitment.
100.0%
And
99.5%
so
100.0%
they
100.0%
decide
98.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
exclusive
100.0%
and
99.9%
to
99.8%
leave
100.0%
that
100.0%
nonsense
99.9%
polyamory
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
past.
100.0%
Now
100.0%
that
100.0%
Jack
98.5%
has
99.9%
gone
100.0%
through
100.0%
the
99.9%
hero's
99.6%
journey
82.8%
self
100.0%
reflection
98.7%
and
99.9%
realized
78.2%
it
99.9%
was
100.0%
just
100.0%
a
98.4%
crutch
93.8%
for
99.1%
immaturity
99.7%
all
99.9%
along,
98.6%
non
100.0%
monogamy
87.1%
is
99.9%
just
100.0%
misogyny.
100.0%
There's
99.9%
a
100.0%
critique
100.0%
which
100.0%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
comes
99.9%
from
100.0%
cultural
100.0%
ideas
99.8%
of
100.0%
polygamy
91.2%
or
99.7%
like
96.7%
plural
99.3%
marriage,
90.2%
that
99.6%
non
99.9%
monogamous
100.0%
relationships
99.9%
are
100.0%
inherently
100.0%
sex,
78.1%
sexist,
99.9%
patriarchal
91.2%
and
99.9%
exploitative.
99.1%
In
100.0%
the
100.0%
United
99.9%
States,
100.0%
there
99.8%
is
99.9%
a
99.9%
particular
100.0%
modern
99.9%
fascination
96.3%
with
77.7%
fundamentalist
99.9%
Mormons
85.4%
who
100.0%
believe
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
99.3%
principle
94.0%
AKA
85.7%
plural
100.0%
marriage
99.5%
where
99.9%
one
100.0%
man
100.0%
has
100.0%
many
100.0%
wives.
100.0%
I
99.8%
mean
100.0%
truly,
97.3%
if
100.0%
you
100.0%
look
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
99.9%
number
100.0%
of
100.0%
commissioned
79.6%
TV
99.9%
shows
100.0%
about
99.9%
it,
99.9%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
obsessed
91.8%
with
100.0%
this.
99.7%
Most
100.0%
recently
99.8%
we've
99.9%
been
99.1%
bombarded
100.0%
with
100.0%
media
100.0%
depicting
99.9%
extreme
99.8%
forms
100.0%
of
100.0%
religious
100.0%
polygamy
98.8%
often
100.0%
linked
100.0%
to
100.0%
extreme
100.0%
misogyny
99.9%
and
99.9%
abuse.
99.8%
There
99.6%
have
65.3%
been
100.0%
numerous
99.3%
documentaries
99.4%
about
100.0%
work
18.6%
and
74.3%
Jeff's
90.6%
the
99.8%
Leader
99.8%
of
99.9%
the
99.6%
FLDS
99.9%
alone,
98.9%
from
99.7%
Keep
99.7%
Sweet
98.7%
Pray
99.8%
and
98.9%
Obey
100.0%
to
99.9%
Profit
88.7%
of
97.8%
Evil.
76.5%
In
99.9%
the
99.9%
award
98.6%
winning
100.0%
under
100.0%
the
99.9%
Banner
76.5%
of
99.9%
Heaven,
99.8%
a
99.5%
miniseries
83.4%
based
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
real
99.9%
murder
100.0%
of
100.0%
Brenda
100.0%
Lafferty,
99.9%
we
99.7%
see
100.0%
Ron
78.1%
and
99.8%
Dan
100.0%
Lafferty
99.9%
become
99.7%
radicalized
88.7%
and
99.9%
go
99.9%
from
100.0%
LDS
100.0%
members
100.0%
to
100.0%
religious
95.6%
extremists
100.0%
who
100.0%
believe
100.0%
in
100.0%
polygamy
98.9%
and
83.5%
blood
90.7%
atonement.
99.9%
In
100.0%
both
100.0%
the
99.9%
case
99.9%
of
99.7%
the
99.4%
Lafferty
98.4%
brothers
99.8%
and
100.0%
the
99.6%
LFTs,
80.5%
polygamy
100.0%
overlaps
90.2%
with
99.9%
paedophilia
96.0%
and
100.0%
incest.
100.0%
Cristina
94.0%
Rossetti
98.0%
writes
99.8%
in
99.8%
the
99.3%
as
99.8%
the
92.2%
Laverty
95.7%
brothers
97.8%
entered
100.0%
Robert
96.3%
Crossfield's
96.2%
orbit,
100.0%
they
99.8%
became
99.8%
interested
99.9%
in
97.0%
polygamy
100.0%
and
100.0%
sought
100.0%
to
100.0%
practice
75.9%
the
99.9%
early
100.0%
Mormon
100.0%
doctrine.
99.9%
By
100.0%
the
100.0%
time
100.0%
of
99.8%
the
99.9%
murders,
99.6%
Crossfield
99.8%
advocated
98.2%
for
99.9%
incestuous
99.9%
marriage
100.0%
and
98.4%
married
96.4%
at
100.0%
least
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
99.9%
his
100.0%
biological
100.0%
children.
100.0%
Like
100.0%
Crossfield,
99.3%
Dan
100.0%
Laverty's
98.8%
attempt
100.0%
at
100.0%
a
99.9%
polygamous
99.9%
union
100.0%
involved
89.5%
grooming
93.2%
his
100.0%
own
99.8%
daughter
100.0%
to
100.0%
marry
100.0%
him.
100.0%
Under
100.0%
the
100.0%
banner
100.0%
of
100.0%
heaven,
100.0%
Rossetti
98.3%
argues,
99.7%
portrays
99.9%
his
50.0%
abuse
90.2%
as
99.9%
the
99.9%
outcome
100.0%
of
100.0%
polygamy's
94.7%
slippery
100.0%
slope.
99.9%
Polygamy
98.5%
in
99.9%
these
99.7%
contexts
99.7%
is
99.9%
a
100.0%
social
100.0%
construct
100.0%
created
97.4%
exclusively
98.5%
to
100.0%
control
100.0%
and
97.9%
abuse
99.9%
women
100.0%
and
100.0%
girls.
100.0%
The
99.6%
Hamas
62.4%
10
75.0%
tales
56.3%
sees
83.4%
a
99.9%
version
90.6%
of
100.0%
religious
93.3%
non
99.9%
monogamous
100.0%
marriages
91.0%
where
99.9%
commanders
99.9%
in
100.0%
this
99.9%
dystopian
100.0%
world
100.0%
have
98.2%
both
99.9%
a
100.0%
wife
100.0%
and
98.7%
a
99.5%
so
99.3%
called
100.0%
handmaid.
99.9%
In
99.8%
the
100.0%
world
99.6%
of
99.9%
Gilead,
100.0%
they
99.9%
almost
100.0%
downplay
86.4%
the
99.8%
corrupted
96.4%
traditional
100.0%
monogamous
99.9%
marriage
91.8%
by
100.0%
reducing
100.0%
women
100.0%
to
100.0%
their
99.9%
specific
100.0%
roles
98.1%
so
100.0%
that
99.9%
no
100.0%
woman
99.7%
counts
100.0%
as
99.7%
like
93.1%
a
100.0%
full
100.0%
person.
96.2%
Handmaids
98.3%
are
99.3%
walking
100.0%
wombs,
83.7%
wives
100.0%
are
98.9%
mothers,
99.4%
Marthas
85.2%
are
98.7%
domestic
100.0%
caretakers.
99.9%
The
99.8%
position
100.0%
taken
100.0%
within
99.8%
the
99.8%
ceremony,
99.9%
which
99.5%
ritualizes
96.4%
attempts
99.9%
to
100.0%
conceive
89.3%
a
99.9%
child
100.0%
through
99.9%
the
99.9%
rape
97.9%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
handmaid
90.8%
in
99.8%
the
99.4%
marriage
100.0%
bed,
99.9%
drives
94.9%
this
99.7%
home
100.0%
where
87.9%
the
97.9%
handmaid
72.6%
overlaps
99.9%
her
99.9%
body
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
96.8%
wife
100.0%
and
99.5%
they
99.9%
combine
100.0%
into
99.9%
one
100.0%
woman.
99.9%
Of
100.0%
course,
100.0%
not
99.8%
all
99.4%
portrayals
99.9%
of
99.9%
religious
100.0%
polygamy
98.8%
are
99.7%
as
97.4%
dark
98.6%
as
99.9%
that.
89.3%
If
100.0%
you're
84.8%
an
100.0%
American
100.0%
millennial,
95.5%
your
99.6%
first
100.0%
exposure
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
concept
100.0%
of
100.0%
plural
100.0%
marriage
100.0%
was
99.9%
probably
99.4%
Sister
99.3%
Wives,
94.0%
a
99.8%
reality
100.0%
TV
90.3%
show
100.0%
on
99.9%
TLC
78.6%
that
96.9%
followed
100.0%
man
96.1%
Cody
98.3%
Brown
90.2%
and
99.8%
his
99.9%
then
99.6%
four
99.9%
wives,
92.6%
Meri,
74.9%
Janelle,
96.7%
Christine
92.2%
and
100.0%
Robin.
85.2%
While
99.9%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
did
99.6%
rely
100.0%
on
100.0%
polygamy
95.5%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
source
100.0%
of
100.0%
conflict
100.0%
and
99.8%
dramatic
99.9%
tension,
99.0%
Sister
100.0%
Wives
82.5%
also
99.9%
depicted
100.0%
the
100.0%
Brown
86.9%
family
92.5%
family
89.7%
as
99.9%
relatively
99.9%
normal.
100.0%
In
99.9%
a
100.0%
review
100.0%
for
99.9%
Sloan,
82.3%
Shyla
80.7%
Velasco
98.6%
wrote,
91.7%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
merely
100.0%
emphasizing
91.6%
what's
100.0%
different
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.9%
Brown
99.4%
family,
100.0%
most
97.0%
obviously
99.9%
their
99.0%
plural
96.1%
marriage
96.1%
Sister
99.4%
Wife
92.9%
shows
94.0%
us
99.7%
how
100.0%
normal
100.0%
they
100.0%
seem
85.1%
loving
100.0%
and
99.9%
good
100.0%
natured
99.9%
around
100.0%
their
100.0%
children,
100.0%
occasionally
100.0%
prone
100.0%
to
100.0%
envy
91.8%
and
99.9%
feelings
88.8%
of
100.0%
betrayal.
100.0%
Another
99.9%
representation
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
healthier
100.0%
version
100.0%
of
100.0%
religious
97.1%
polygamy
100.0%
came
100.0%
about
100.0%
with
99.8%
the
99.9%
HBO
90.9%
series
100.0%
Big
100.0%
Love,
98.0%
which
100.0%
followed
99.9%
a
99.9%
polygamous
98.5%
family
100.0%
in
100.0%
Utah.
96.0%
Nevertheless,
99.4%
these
99.7%
shows
99.8%
still
99.8%
portray
100.0%
polygamy
95.1%
and
97.7%
patriarchy
94.6%
as
100.0%
inextricably
89.9%
linked.
98.3%
The
99.7%
wives
100.0%
orbit
98.5%
their
99.8%
husbands
99.8%
and
99.8%
the
75.3%
family
99.6%
structure
87.9%
props
100.0%
up
99.5%
the
99.9%
patriarch
99.8%
as
100.0%
the
99.8%
primary
100.0%
authority
100.0%
in
99.8%
the
99.8%
household.
100.0%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
seeing
100.0%
these
99.8%
depictions
100.0%
of
100.0%
polygamy
94.1%
as
99.9%
a
98.3%
patriarchal
97.8%
religious
97.5%
institution
88.8%
or
99.8%
even
99.7%
a
99.6%
sign
99.9%
of
100.0%
religious
99.8%
fanaticism,
100.0%
affects
99.8%
how
100.0%
audiences
98.0%
understand
100.0%
non
100.0%
religious
99.9%
polyamory
95.9%
and
99.8%
non
100.0%
monogamy
99.3%
too.
94.7%
That
95.3%
the
100.0%
abundance
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
99.9%
kind
99.8%
of
100.0%
media,
100.0%
especially
100.0%
with
99.9%
a
99.7%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
wider
99.8%
poly
99.6%
representation,
99.4%
could
99.6%
end
100.0%
up
99.9%
with
99.9%
audiences
100.0%
assuming
97.5%
that
98.6%
all
99.8%
non
100.0%
monogamy
99.9%
is
100.0%
patriarchal
100.0%
bias
53.9%
default.
99.0%
And
99.2%
that
99.9%
simply
99.9%
isn't
100.0%
the
100.0%
case.
99.7%
In
99.8%
fact,
100.0%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
think
100.0%
we
99.9%
can
100.0%
argue
100.0%
that
99.9%
plural
98.5%
marriage
100.0%
itself,
99.6%
marriage
99.9%
between
100.0%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
one
100.0%
person,
100.0%
is
99.9%
any
100.0%
more
99.7%
inherently
89.2%
patriarchal
98.6%
than
100.0%
monogamous
99.8%
marriage.
87.0%
Child
99.7%
brides
99.9%
are
99.8%
not
99.6%
unique
100.0%
to
99.9%
polygamy.
96.3%
Incest
99.9%
isn't
99.5%
unique
99.9%
to
99.9%
polygamy.
99.7%
Abusive
99.9%
relationships
100.0%
aren't
98.3%
unique
99.9%
to
99.9%
polygamy.
99.9%
Marriage
100.0%
revolving
96.3%
around
100.0%
the
100.0%
needs
97.9%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
husband
100.0%
over
100.0%
a
99.9%
wife
100.0%
is
99.5%
not
100.0%
unique
100.0%
to
100.0%
polygamy.
99.9%
Using
99.9%
God
75.8%
and
98.7%
instruments
93.1%
of
100.0%
religion
100.0%
to
100.0%
coerce
99.9%
women
100.0%
into
100.0%
reproductive
100.0%
labor,
67.2%
again
99.9%
sadly,
100.0%
not
100.0%
unique
100.0%
to
100.0%
polygamy.
96.7%
The
100.0%
framing
99.5%
of
100.0%
these
99.8%
shows,
100.0%
especially
100.0%
those
100.0%
invested
99.9%
in
100.0%
selling
100.0%
these
97.2%
sensationalist
99.1%
images
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
subject
100.0%
matter
100.0%
often
100.0%
revolve
98.7%
around
100.0%
sharing
80.2%
polygamy
99.9%
as
99.9%
a
100.0%
danger
100.0%
equated
99.2%
with
100.0%
these
99.9%
other
100.0%
issues.
99.3%
There's
99.9%
a
100.0%
show
99.4%
about
100.0%
women
100.0%
leaving
100.0%
fundamentalist
99.8%
organizations
84.0%
called
99.9%
Escaping
100.0%
Polygamy.
96.7%
Not
99.8%
escaping
88.9%
extremism
100.0%
or
100.0%
escaping
100.0%
abuse.
96.8%
It's
99.7%
just
99.9%
escaping
100.0%
polygamy.
97.6%
Perhaps
99.6%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
reasons
100.0%
why
100.0%
we
100.0%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
society
100.0%
are
100.0%
so
100.0%
drawn
89.7%
towards
99.2%
stories
100.0%
of
100.0%
religious
100.0%
polygamy
98.1%
is
100.0%
because
100.0%
it
100.0%
gives
100.0%
us
100.0%
an
100.0%
excuse
83.9%
to
99.9%
not
100.0%
reckon
99.9%
with
100.0%
the
99.9%
patriarchal
96.7%
and
99.7%
abusive
100.0%
structures
100.0%
that
99.9%
might
100.0%
be
100.0%
found
100.0%
within
73.0%
our
100.0%
own
99.7%
normal
99.7%
monogamous
99.9%
religion.
53.9%
Relationships,
99.7%
too.
97.5%
Portrayals
99.1%
of
100.0%
atheist
95.9%
polygamy
99.6%
still
99.9%
rely
99.9%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
100.0%
plural
99.7%
relationships
99.9%
exist
99.9%
as
100.0%
a
99.8%
patriarchal
97.0%
power
100.0%
structure.
98.8%
Take
99.9%
Negan
100.0%
in
96.2%
the
100.0%
Walking
100.0%
Dead,
100.0%
for
99.8%
example,
96.4%
when
100.0%
he
99.9%
first
100.0%
appears
100.0%
on
99.9%
the
99.9%
show.
100.0%
Negan
99.9%
has
99.9%
several
100.0%
wives.
99.9%
He's
99.9%
an
100.0%
atheist,
89.0%
and
65.1%
for
100.0%
him,
100.0%
polygamy
98.8%
is
99.9%
just
99.5%
a
99.9%
way
100.0%
of
100.0%
flexing
76.9%
his
100.0%
power.
99.8%
He
90.4%
says,
92.3%
I've
97.4%
always
100.0%
wanted
100.0%
to
100.0%
screw
99.9%
a
100.0%
whole
100.0%
bunch
100.0%
of
100.0%
different
99.9%
women.
99.8%
Why
100.0%
settle
100.0%
for
100.0%
just
100.0%
one?
99.9%
Why
99.9%
follow
100.0%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
old
100.0%
rules?
99.5%
Why
100.0%
not
100.0%
make
100.0%
life
100.0%
better?
100.0%
Negan's
99.6%
wives
99.4%
agree
100.0%
to
99.9%
this
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
for
99.9%
reasons
99.9%
of
99.9%
security.
96.6%
They
99.9%
aren't
97.6%
happy,
100.0%
they,
84.1%
they
99.4%
aren't
99.4%
free
100.0%
from
99.8%
coercion.
100.0%
And
98.5%
if
99.9%
they
99.9%
want
95.5%
to
99.8%
have
100.0%
sex
97.0%
with
100.0%
anyone
100.0%
else,
100.0%
they
99.9%
surrender
99.9%
the
99.9%
protection
100.0%
that
95.7%
he
99.9%
offers
100.0%
them.
99.7%
Once
99.9%
again,
100.0%
polygamy
96.0%
becomes
99.9%
conflated
99.5%
with
100.0%
an
99.8%
abuse
99.9%
of
100.0%
power.
99.9%
It's
90.2%
notable
100.0%
that
100.0%
Negan's
99.8%
backstory
99.9%
reveals
100.0%
him
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.9%
devoted
100.0%
husband
100.0%
at
99.5%
least
99.9%
once
100.0%
the
99.9%
apocalypse
90.6%
started.
99.6%
His
99.9%
commitment
100.0%
to
100.0%
his
99.9%
relationship
100.0%
with
53.1%
his
100.0%
dying
98.6%
wife
100.0%
aims
100.0%
to
100.0%
make
100.0%
him
100.0%
a
100.0%
more
100.0%
sympathetic
100.0%
character.
97.1%
Through
99.9%
this
99.7%
narrative
100.0%
lens,
96.3%
polygamy
99.9%
villainizes
99.3%
him,
100.0%
and
99.9%
monogamy
100.0%
partially
96.0%
attempts
99.9%
to
100.0%
redeem
100.0%
him.
99.9%
Negan's
98.8%
one
99.9%
of
100.0%
those
99.7%
annoying
99.8%
examples
97.4%
of
97.0%
violent
99.8%
man
99.9%
loves
99.9%
his
100.0%
dead
100.0%
wife,
99.7%
isn't
100.0%
he?
100.0%
So
99.9%
complicated
93.8%
characters,
95.8%
you
90.3%
know.
99.8%
Even
100.0%
less
100.0%
toxic
100.0%
portrayals
91.8%
of
100.0%
polyamorous
95.5%
relationships
99.9%
still
99.9%
often
99.7%
revolve
91.2%
around
100.0%
this
99.5%
idea
82.6%
of
100.0%
what
100.0%
a
99.9%
male
100.0%
fantasy
98.5%
should
99.9%
look
100.0%
like.
99.5%
One
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
most
99.9%
common
100.0%
forms
100.0%
of
100.0%
poly
99.2%
representation
98.0%
is
100.0%
a
99.8%
throuple
96.2%
with
99.9%
one
99.9%
man
99.9%
and
99.7%
two
99.6%
bi
99.2%
women.
96.0%
We've
99.9%
seen
99.9%
it
99.6%
in
99.5%
Yumi,
89.6%
her,
94.2%
in
99.5%
Vicky
91.7%
Cristina
75.7%
Barcelona,
99.8%
Transparent
99.8%
and
99.3%
more.
99.4%
And
99.3%
while
99.8%
those
99.1%
relationships
99.9%
do
99.4%
exist
100.0%
and
99.9%
aren't,
99.9%
um,
81.4%
like,
98.2%
inherently
94.5%
toxic
100.0%
or
99.9%
sexist,
100.0%
the
99.9%
overrepresentation
93.8%
of
100.0%
this
99.8%
dynamic
100.0%
ultimately
100.0%
reinforces
100.0%
an
99.4%
idea
100.0%
that,
99.8%
uh,
89.9%
polyamory
96.5%
is
99.9%
just
99.9%
for
99.9%
the
99.8%
fulfillment,
83.2%
fulfillment
77.6%
of
99.9%
straight
99.8%
men
100.0%
and
99.9%
their
99.9%
desires
99.6%
for
99.8%
power
100.0%
and
99.8%
sex.
99.9%
In
100.0%
addition
100.0%
to
99.9%
its
99.5%
patriarchal
100.0%
associations,
87.6%
the
99.8%
perception
100.0%
of
100.0%
non
99.9%
monogamy
99.8%
as
99.9%
inherently
86.4%
immoral
99.6%
is
99.8%
reinforced
98.6%
by
100.0%
the
98.9%
narratives
95.5%
that
99.9%
rely
100.0%
on
99.9%
conflict
99.6%
derived
87.7%
from
100.0%
polyamory.
89.2%
Jealousy,
100.0%
cheating,
99.5%
and
77.7%
lying.
100.0%
Ironically,
100.0%
sometimes
98.6%
it
99.9%
seems
100.0%
that,
98.8%
uh,
89.4%
the
99.9%
only
100.0%
characters
100.0%
you
97.9%
get
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
satisfying
98.6%
polyamorous
100.0%
relationships
99.9%
are
99.9%
villains.
99.9%
In
99.9%
the
99.9%
chilling
86.4%
Adventures
100.0%
of
99.9%
Sabrina,
95.0%
the
99.9%
antagonists
99.9%
regularly
99.9%
reference
93.7%
non
100.0%
monogamy.
99.4%
While
99.7%
polyamory
92.4%
is
61.7%
isn't
99.9%
itself
99.9%
necessarily
100.0%
malicious
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
99.8%
show,
98.2%
it
97.9%
signifies
89.3%
a
100.0%
less
100.0%
virtuous
99.7%
path
85.3%
in
99.9%
many
100.0%
ways.
99.9%
In
99.5%
the
99.9%
show,
99.9%
monogamy
100.0%
represents
99.9%
true
100.0%
love
100.0%
and
99.8%
redemption,
100.0%
whereas
99.9%
polyamory
91.3%
represents
99.9%
hedonism
99.8%
and
83.5%
passion.
100.0%
The
99.8%
Poly
96.7%
in
93.3%
the
98.8%
Media
99.5%
blog's
86.7%
post
99.5%
about
99.9%
Sabrina
99.5%
shows
100.0%
how
100.0%
well
100.0%
worn
98.6%
the
99.9%
trope
99.9%
is
99.8%
in
100.0%
that
99.6%
show.
99.7%
Polyamory
95.4%
is
100.0%
just
100.0%
a
100.0%
minor
100.0%
point,
100.0%
but
99.8%
it
94.8%
is
99.3%
consistently
91.0%
used
99.9%
to
100.0%
show
100.0%
just
100.0%
how
100.0%
villainous
100.0%
the
100.0%
villains
99.4%
are
99.9%
and
99.8%
possibly
98.0%
even
100.0%
to
100.0%
point
100.0%
out
100.0%
who
100.0%
are
84.8%
the
100.0%
true
100.0%
villains
99.5%
and
100.0%
who
100.0%
might
100.0%
be
100.0%
heroes.
100.0%
And
99.4%
this
100.0%
perception
99.9%
of
99.9%
polyamory
85.2%
as
96.3%
not
100.0%
just
100.0%
being
99.8%
unusual
100.0%
or
99.5%
outside
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
norm,
99.9%
but
95.2%
like
88.1%
actively
78.1%
immoral
97.3%
can
99.9%
aff
99.5%
poly
93.1%
people
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
real
100.0%
world.
99.9%
There
99.8%
is
100.0%
real
99.9%
risk
100.0%
to
99.9%
challenging
98.2%
the
99.9%
norm
100.0%
in
99.9%
any
100.0%
way,
99.8%
shape
100.0%
or
99.9%
form,
100.0%
um,
99.0%
that
98.9%
queer
99.1%
people
100.0%
especially
99.9%
know.
98.1%
But
99.4%
straight
100.0%
people
100.0%
learn
99.8%
when
99.9%
they
100.0%
want
95.5%
to
99.4%
be
98.2%
polyamorous.
98.5%
It's
97.0%
like,
99.2%
yeah,
99.3%
you're
85.3%
letting
100.0%
go
100.0%
of
99.9%
some
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
98.3%
social
100.0%
benefits.
99.8%
You're
86.3%
inviting
100.0%
some
99.9%
social
100.0%
judgment.
99.3%
And
99.2%
there
100.0%
is
100.0%
real
99.9%
risk
100.0%
of
99.6%
like,
92.4%
it's
99.7%
not
100.0%
a
99.9%
protected
99.8%
class.
100.0%
So
96.0%
sometimes
92.6%
people
100.0%
get
100.0%
fired,
100.0%
you
85.0%
know,
100.0%
um,
97.4%
if
99.6%
they're
99.3%
like
94.0%
not
98.8%
moral,
99.4%
not
74.3%
morality
89.2%
clause
97.1%
or
88.2%
whatever.
99.7%
So,
88.0%
um,
99.9%
yeah,
92.2%
you
99.8%
just
100.0%
risk
100.0%
reward,
99.8%
you
92.1%
know,
99.2%
is
70.6%
that
99.6%
is
98.3%
challenging
98.2%
that
100.0%
still
100.0%
easier
100.0%
than,
99.9%
you
95.1%
know,
100.0%
having
100.0%
to
100.0%
hide
100.0%
who
100.0%
you
100.0%
are
100.0%
and
53.1%
how
100.0%
you,
100.0%
um,
81.8%
love.
99.9%
And
99.4%
that's
99.9%
a
99.9%
very
99.9%
personal
100.0%
decision.
100.0%
Even
99.8%
if
100.0%
you
100.0%
don't
100.0%
identify
100.0%
as
100.0%
polyamorous.
97.8%
Seeing
100.0%
poly
98.8%
representation
99.1%
on
99.9%
screen
99.9%
can
100.0%
help
100.0%
expand
100.0%
our
99.9%
ideas
99.9%
of
99.9%
what
99.9%
relationships,
99.9%
love
100.0%
and
100.0%
intimacy
100.0%
should
100.0%
look
100.0%
like.
100.0%
At
99.5%
its
99.2%
best,
100.0%
poly
99.6%
representation
98.6%
might
100.0%
force
97.1%
audiences
100.0%
to
100.0%
reckon
98.7%
with
100.0%
the
100.0%
possibility
94.0%
that
100.0%
many
100.0%
of
100.0%
our
99.9%
cultural
100.0%
norms
99.8%
around
99.9%
relationships,
76.0%
relationships
99.9%
might
100.0%
in
99.9%
fact
100.0%
be
100.0%
harmful
99.8%
to
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
and
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
people
100.0%
alike.
100.0%
And
99.3%
it
100.0%
might
100.0%
not
100.0%
even
100.0%
be
100.0%
that
100.0%
audience
100.0%
members
99.9%
will
100.0%
ever
100.0%
be
100.0%
interested
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
99.7%
non
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
dynamic
100.0%
for
99.9%
themselves.
100.0%
But
99.9%
it
100.0%
might
100.0%
allow
100.0%
them
100.0%
to
100.0%
expand
100.0%
what
100.0%
their
100.0%
own
99.9%
monogamous
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
looks
100.0%
like.
100.0%
The
100.0%
norm
100.0%
of
100.0%
monogamy
100.0%
also
100.0%
comes
100.0%
with
79.8%
certain
100.0%
assumptions
100.0%
and
100.0%
expectations
100.0%
that
100.0%
I
100.0%
mentioned
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
of
99.9%
this
100.0%
video.
100.0%
For
100.0%
example,
86.3%
as
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
monogamy,
100.0%
it
59.0%
might
99.9%
also
100.0%
be
100.0%
assumed
85.4%
that
99.9%
your
99.9%
romantic
100.0%
partner
97.8%
should
100.0%
be
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
fulfill
94.5%
all
100.0%
of
99.9%
your
100.0%
emotional
82.6%
needs,
91.3%
that
99.8%
monogamous
99.9%
relationship
100.0%
dynamics
100.0%
are
100.0%
instinctual
100.0%
for
100.0%
everyone,
99.7%
that
99.7%
you
99.9%
should
100.0%
only
100.0%
develop
100.0%
romantic
94.9%
and
99.9%
sexual
99.7%
feelings
100.0%
for
100.0%
one
100.0%
person
100.0%
at
100.0%
a
100.0%
time.
100.0%
We
100.0%
can
100.0%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
authentic
100.0%
portrayals
99.5%
of
100.0%
polyamory,
88.3%
especially
100.0%
healthy
100.0%
and
88.1%
happy
100.0%
ones,
100.0%
might
99.9%
allow
100.0%
viewers
100.0%
to
100.0%
question
100.0%
these
100.0%
assumptions.
100.0%
Not
99.8%
just
100.0%
that,
100.0%
but
100.0%
also
99.8%
allow
100.0%
them
100.0%
to
100.0%
question
100.0%
any
100.0%
guilt,
91.8%
shame
100.0%
or
100.0%
confusion
100.0%
that
99.9%
might
99.9%
come
100.0%
with
100.0%
not
100.0%
aligning
100.0%
perfectly
96.7%
with
100.0%
this
99.9%
assumed
86.4%
monogamous
99.9%
norm.
99.9%
People
100.0%
who
100.0%
don't
100.0%
find
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
partnerships
99.8%
natural
100.0%
or
70.6%
instinctual.
99.9%
To
100.0%
them,
99.9%
those
100.0%
who
99.6%
find
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
99.8%
of
100.0%
one
100.0%
person
100.0%
automatically
92.0%
becomes
76.2%
becoming
98.6%
their
99.8%
sole
98.8%
interpersonal
92.9%
priority,
100.0%
limiting
99.7%
or
94.6%
overwhelming
91.2%
those
99.9%
who
100.0%
find
100.0%
themselves
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
fall
99.9%
in
99.9%
romantic
97.9%
love
100.0%
with
100.0%
multiple
90.2%
people
100.0%
at
100.0%
a
100.0%
time.
99.9%
In
99.9%
fact,
99.3%
we
100.0%
might
100.0%
end
100.0%
up
100.0%
questioning
100.0%
the
100.0%
origins
97.6%
of
100.0%
monogamy
100.0%
itself
100.0%
and
96.9%
why
100.0%
those
100.0%
in
99.9%
power
100.0%
might
99.9%
benefit
100.0%
from
100.0%
keeping
100.0%
it
100.0%
as
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
status
76.6%
quo.
100.0%
There
100.0%
are
99.9%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
different
100.0%
factors
100.0%
which
99.9%
historically
100.0%
seem
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
contributed
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
creation
100.0%
of
100.0%
monogamous
99.8%
societies
99.8%
in
99.8%
the
100.0%
modern
100.0%
world,
100.0%
but
99.9%
it
99.9%
seems
99.9%
to
99.0%
most
99.8%
often
100.0%
be
99.8%
tied
88.3%
to
100.0%
ideas
100.0%
of
99.9%
ownership
100.0%
and
99.9%
scarcity
99.3%
of,
97.1%
uh,
65.3%
various
99.9%
kinds.
96.8%
Monogamy
99.9%
allows
100.0%
for
100.0%
paternal
99.9%
certainty
99.6%
with
99.5%
one
100.0%
man
99.9%
and
99.9%
one
99.6%
woman
99.9%
certain,
100.0%
uh,
76.4%
that
99.1%
they
99.9%
are
99.8%
the
99.3%
parents
99.9%
of
99.9%
a
99.9%
child
99.0%
that
98.7%
they
100.0%
will
99.6%
raise
100.0%
and
85.2%
provide
100.0%
for,
99.9%
which
99.6%
becomes
100.0%
especially
100.0%
important
100.0%
as
99.9%
inheritance
100.0%
becomes
100.0%
an
100.0%
option.
98.9%
That
99.9%
is,
99.8%
when
99.9%
we
99.8%
get
100.0%
societies
95.3%
productive
100.0%
enough
100.0%
for
99.9%
there
99.7%
to
100.0%
be
99.9%
something
100.0%
left
100.0%
to
100.0%
pass
100.0%
on
99.8%
when
99.9%
you
100.0%
die.
99.2%
It
99.7%
ensures
99.9%
a
99.9%
reasonable
100.0%
level
100.0%
of
100.0%
stability
99.9%
if
99.2%
it
86.7%
is
79.2%
universally
99.1%
agreed
100.0%
upon
99.4%
that
99.6%
this
99.3%
is
99.8%
how
100.0%
issues
99.5%
of
100.0%
excess
87.7%
wealth
100.0%
are
100.0%
dealt
100.0%
with.
99.9%
And
98.7%
conversely,
98.9%
fears
99.9%
of
99.9%
resource
100.0%
scarcity
99.0%
might
99.9%
be
100.0%
alleviated
97.6%
in
99.9%
time
99.9%
periods
100.0%
where
98.7%
men
100.0%
are
100.0%
expected
100.0%
to
100.0%
provide
100.0%
for
100.0%
women
100.0%
and
100.0%
children
100.0%
in
99.9%
their
98.6%
family.
99.1%
If
100.0%
there
100.0%
are
99.9%
fewer
99.9%
dependents,
97.9%
for
95.7%
example,
88.3%
one
99.9%
wife
100.0%
and
99.8%
2.5
99.7%
kids,
100.0%
this
99.5%
becomes
99.7%
of
49.0%
manageable.
98.3%
The
99.9%
assumption
100.0%
that
100.0%
everyone
100.0%
will
100.0%
end
100.0%
in
99.9%
a
99.9%
married,
99.9%
monogamous
100.0%
romantic
100.0%
relationship,
100.0%
probably
92.6%
with
100.0%
children,
100.0%
is
99.5%
ultimately
100.0%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
way
100.0%
that
97.9%
our
99.8%
society
100.0%
is
100.0%
structured
98.7%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
ground
100.0%
up.
99.3%
The
99.8%
type
99.6%
of
100.0%
housing
99.9%
we
99.9%
build,
99.4%
its
98.1%
size,
99.6%
setup
93.3%
and
99.8%
affordability
82.8%
are
99.7%
geared
100.0%
towards
99.6%
couples.
99.7%
Private
100.0%
health
99.8%
care
90.9%
might
99.7%
be
100.0%
available
99.9%
through
100.0%
a
100.0%
spouse
100.0%
or
100.0%
parent,
99.9%
but
99.9%
not
100.0%
through
99.8%
other
100.0%
close
99.9%
relationships.
100.0%
Disability
100.0%
benefits
100.0%
and
77.7%
support
100.0%
infrastructure
98.1%
often
100.0%
assume
99.9%
a
99.8%
romantic
100.0%
partner
100.0%
will
91.1%
take
100.0%
on
99.8%
carer
94.7%
duties.
95.5%
Access
100.0%
to
100.0%
visas
100.0%
and
99.9%
reunification
100.0%
are
99.9%
based
100.0%
on
100.0%
traditional
96.4%
monogamous
99.9%
models
100.0%
of
99.6%
family.
99.1%
The
99.9%
insular
100.0%
nature
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.5%
nuclear
90.9%
family
94.5%
family
91.7%
is
99.9%
also
99.9%
kind
98.7%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
perfect
99.3%
way
100.0%
to
100.0%
encourage
96.8%
isolated
99.4%
consumption,
88.4%
Especially
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
capitalist
100.0%
society,
100.0%
which
70.5%
discourages
100.0%
the
96.9%
sharing
100.0%
of
100.0%
goods
100.0%
and
99.9%
possessions
100.0%
in
99.9%
favor
91.7%
of
100.0%
each
100.0%
household
100.0%
purchasing
100.0%
everything
99.9%
they
100.0%
need,
100.0%
even
100.0%
if
100.0%
only
100.0%
for
99.9%
a
100.0%
handful
100.0%
of
100.0%
days
100.0%
a
100.0%
year.
100.0%
In
95.4%
the
95.8%
examples
87.2%
of
100.0%
successful
100.0%
happy
100.0%
polyamorous
99.9%
relationships,
99.9%
we
99.3%
might
100.0%
also
100.0%
see
100.0%
examples
100.0%
of
100.0%
sustainable
100.0%
community
100.0%
models.
99.2%
I
99.2%
think
100.0%
in
99.9%
general,
100.0%
all
100.0%
over
100.0%
the
100.0%
world,
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
sort
99.0%
of
99.9%
waking
100.0%
up
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
100.0%
fact
100.0%
that
100.0%
if
100.0%
they
99.8%
don't
100.0%
have
100.0%
a
100.0%
sense
100.0%
of
100.0%
community,
100.0%
they
99.9%
want
97.2%
to
90.8%
get,
35.0%
get
91.5%
it
99.9%
now.
99.9%
They
100.0%
want
94.2%
to
99.9%
build
100.0%
community
100.0%
more.
99.8%
There's
99.6%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
more,
99.9%
um,
90.1%
talk
100.0%
about,
99.9%
like,
83.5%
we
99.9%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
keep
100.0%
each
100.0%
other
99.6%
safe.
99.8%
If
99.9%
we
100.0%
don't
100.0%
feel
100.0%
safe
99.8%
in,
96.9%
you
79.8%
know,
100.0%
the,
88.1%
the
99.7%
political
100.0%
climate
99.5%
and
98.7%
so
100.0%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
that
100.0%
really
100.0%
comes
100.0%
down
100.0%
to,
99.9%
like,
98.2%
are
100.0%
we
100.0%
willing
95.8%
to
100.0%
work
100.0%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
team
100.0%
or
99.8%
are
99.9%
we
100.0%
feeling,
90.8%
like,
97.0%
isolated
100.0%
and
100.0%
possessive
90.8%
and,
65.1%
you
93.2%
know,
100.0%
um,
98.8%
really
99.9%
stuck
100.0%
in
100.0%
our
100.0%
roles?
99.6%
And
98.5%
so
83.5%
if,
85.2%
if
100.0%
we're
99.8%
imagining
81.0%
building
100.0%
out
100.0%
a
99.9%
network
100.0%
of
100.0%
chosen
100.0%
family,
99.2%
whether
100.0%
you
100.0%
sleep
91.8%
with
100.0%
somebody
97.3%
or
99.5%
not,
60.7%
that's
99.8%
your
99.5%
choice,
100.0%
you
77.6%
know.
100.0%
But
99.4%
can
100.0%
there
99.9%
be
100.0%
this,
99.9%
like,
91.5%
inclusive,
98.2%
welcoming,
90.0%
challenging
99.9%
of
99.9%
our
100.0%
possessiveness,
98.8%
challenging
87.3%
of
99.5%
a
99.4%
sense
100.0%
of
100.0%
ownership,
100.0%
um,
99.5%
so
100.0%
that
99.9%
we
100.0%
can
100.0%
have
100.0%
that,
100.0%
like,
79.8%
feeling
100.0%
that
99.9%
we're
99.9%
taking
97.3%
care
100.0%
of
99.9%
and
99.7%
that
99.5%
we're
99.8%
taking
99.9%
care
100.0%
of
100.0%
other
100.0%
people?
100.0%
So
95.6%
you
100.0%
can
100.0%
absolutely
100.0%
have
100.0%
community
100.0%
without
100.0%
being
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamous.
99.9%
I
99.9%
just
99.8%
think
99.9%
the
100.0%
work
100.0%
required
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
a
100.0%
good
100.0%
time
100.0%
in
99.9%
non
100.0%
monogamy
99.7%
or
99.8%
have
99.9%
a
100.0%
good
100.0%
time
100.0%
at
64.8%
polyamory,
99.9%
it's
98.7%
similar
100.0%
work
99.9%
to
99.7%
challenging
93.0%
what
99.1%
you
100.0%
got
98.9%
to
85.4%
challenge
92.4%
when
100.0%
you're
100.0%
building
100.0%
out
100.0%
a
99.9%
community
100.0%
of
100.0%
any
100.0%
kind.
100.0%
And
95.2%
so,
99.7%
yeah,
99.7%
I
99.8%
think
100.0%
there's
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
overlap
90.2%
there.
99.3%
Some
99.7%
portrayals
98.2%
of
97.8%
polyamory
99.9%
explore
76.6%
the
100.0%
possibilities
99.9%
of
100.0%
questioning
100.0%
the
100.0%
status
100.0%
quo.
95.2%
My
100.0%
favorite
69.2%
show
100.0%
of
100.0%
all
100.0%
time,
99.4%
it's
92.8%
no
97.9%
Secret,
100.0%
is
91.0%
Black
99.7%
Sails,
99.0%
and
99.4%
it
99.6%
actually
99.5%
has
99.9%
multiple
99.9%
poly
99.1%
dynamics
93.0%
which
99.8%
are
96.0%
part
99.8%
of
99.9%
characters
97.7%
exploring
90.1%
the
100.0%
difference
100.0%
between
100.0%
culturally
99.7%
defined
100.0%
morality
100.0%
and
62.3%
their
99.8%
own
100.0%
sense
100.0%
of
100.0%
right
100.0%
and
99.9%
wrong.
100.0%
The
99.9%
lead
99.8%
in
99.5%
the
97.7%
show
100.0%
is
99.9%
Captain
99.9%
Flint.
97.8%
He's
99.8%
a
99.9%
feared
83.6%
and
99.8%
ruthless
100.0%
pirate,
99.5%
but
97.6%
he's
99.9%
also
100.0%
the
100.0%
devoted
99.9%
partner
100.0%
of
99.9%
Miranda,
99.7%
an
99.4%
English
100.0%
woman
62.2%
banished
99.7%
from
99.9%
high
99.9%
society
100.0%
because
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
98.5%
affair.
100.0%
It's
99.9%
revealed
89.8%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
second
100.0%
season
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
that
99.9%
the
99.8%
affair
81.1%
that
97.7%
they
100.0%
are
99.6%
being
99.9%
punished
100.0%
for
100.0%
was
99.9%
in
99.9%
fact
100.0%
a
100.0%
romance
97.8%
between
100.0%
Flint
81.0%
and
99.9%
Miranda's
99.9%
husband
100.0%
Thomas.
89.2%
Wholly
99.7%
known
99.9%
about
100.0%
and
99.9%
consented
100.0%
to
99.9%
by
99.9%
all
100.0%
three
100.0%
parties.
99.9%
Flint
88.2%
and
99.9%
Miranda
99.9%
find
100.0%
a
100.0%
desperate
90.2%
harbour
80.2%
in
99.4%
each
100.0%
other
99.8%
after
100.0%
Thomas's
95.4%
death.
100.0%
But
100.0%
even
99.9%
out
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
99.4%
lawless
99.9%
world
99.9%
of
99.7%
piracy,
92.4%
they
99.9%
struggle
94.5%
to
100.0%
figure
100.0%
out
100.0%
what
100.0%
they
100.0%
are
100.0%
to
100.0%
each
100.0%
other
100.0%
as
99.9%
a
99.6%
pair.
99.9%
Without
100.0%
him,
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
81.7%
them
99.8%
attempt
100.0%
to
100.0%
solidify
100.0%
the
62.7%
intelligence
44.4%
intimacy
100.0%
with
99.9%
sex,
99.9%
which
99.9%
clearly
100.0%
doesn't
99.7%
feel
100.0%
right.
99.9%
Unlike
99.6%
the
99.1%
glimpses
96.9%
of
99.9%
Thomas
91.8%
and
98.8%
Flynt's
87.8%
sexual
100.0%
intimacy
100.0%
we
99.6%
see
99.8%
in
100.0%
the
99.9%
past,
99.5%
they
99.8%
argue
89.6%
nearly
99.8%
constantly
100.0%
about
99.6%
wider
99.2%
visions
98.9%
of
99.9%
social
100.0%
and
99.9%
political
100.0%
change
100.0%
and
99.6%
instability.
100.0%
Unlike
99.8%
the
100.0%
clear
99.9%
respect
100.0%
and
96.2%
joy
100.0%
that
99.8%
Miranda
100.0%
and
99.9%
Thomas
100.0%
shared
100.0%
in
99.8%
hosting
100.0%
gatherings
100.0%
of
100.0%
intellectuals
90.8%
and
100.0%
reformers
100.0%
at
99.7%
their
99.4%
home
100.0%
in
99.9%
England.
95.8%
Before
99.7%
their
99.0%
unusual
100.0%
but
100.0%
loving
100.0%
triad
91.0%
was
100.0%
a
100.0%
source
97.3%
of
100.0%
joy
100.0%
and
99.9%
fulfilment
87.8%
to
99.7%
all
100.0%
three
100.0%
of
99.6%
them.
93.2%
Without
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
99.9%
its
99.8%
members,
100.0%
the
100.0%
remaining
100.0%
two
99.9%
are
100.0%
adrift.
99.9%
Much
100.0%
like
99.9%
romantic
100.0%
notions
100.0%
of
100.0%
monogamous
99.8%
partners,
100.0%
after
99.9%
one
99.5%
person
13.8%
passes,
98.1%
the
99.7%
show
100.0%
acknowledges
88.7%
the
100.0%
unique
100.0%
bonds
99.9%
between
100.0%
each
100.0%
pair
79.6%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
triad,
95.8%
but
99.9%
also
100.0%
the
100.0%
strength
99.7%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
three
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
100.0%
together.
100.0%
Similarly,
100.0%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
creates
100.0%
what
100.0%
we
100.0%
might
100.0%
label
100.0%
as
99.2%
queer
96.0%
platonic
91.0%
development
100.0%
to
99.8%
a
100.0%
couple
100.0%
who
100.0%
are
51.4%
originally
100.0%
together
100.0%
romantically
99.9%
and
99.9%
sexually
99.7%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
show
100.0%
and
94.9%
who
97.7%
we
99.6%
assume
98.3%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
heterosexual.
99.8%
Real
99.9%
life
99.1%
pirates
99.9%
Anne,
78.1%
Bonnie
89.0%
and
99.9%
Jack
100.0%
Rackham
97.9%
begin
99.8%
Black
94.0%
sails
95.9%
as
100.0%
partners
100.0%
in
100.0%
pretty
100.0%
much
100.0%
every
100.0%
way.
99.2%
But
99.9%
in
100.0%
season
100.0%
two,
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
99.9%
parallel
100.0%
storyline
98.9%
to
100.0%
our
99.9%
tragic
100.0%
triad
98.0%
of
99.7%
Miranda
100.0%
Flint
94.5%
and
99.8%
Thomas,
100.0%
Amberg
54.2%
begins
98.6%
to
99.9%
question
100.0%
essentially
99.9%
the
100.0%
compet
62.4%
of
100.0%
it
99.9%
all.
97.0%
She
100.0%
starts
100.0%
to
99.9%
fall
99.8%
for
99.9%
another
100.0%
woman,
99.8%
Max.
99.3%
And
99.8%
soon
100.0%
the
100.0%
two
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
100.0%
and
99.8%
Jack
99.5%
are
100.0%
in
100.0%
bed
100.0%
together,
99.9%
seeing
99.8%
if
100.0%
they
99.9%
can
99.7%
make
100.0%
this
99.7%
whole
99.8%
thing
100.0%
work.
99.8%
It's
99.9%
clear
100.0%
at
99.9%
first
100.0%
that
100.0%
Jack
79.5%
is
100.0%
struggling
96.7%
with
100.0%
losing
99.9%
Anne.
74.5%
Uh,
85.0%
if
100.0%
she
100.0%
decides
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
romantically
99.1%
involved
100.0%
only
100.0%
with
100.0%
Max
100.0%
and
99.8%
not
100.0%
with
99.9%
him.
100.0%
Because
99.9%
he
100.0%
struggles
100.0%
to
100.0%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
to
100.0%
keep
100.0%
Anne
95.7%
close
99.5%
to
99.8%
show
99.8%
how
100.0%
important
100.0%
they
100.0%
are
100.0%
to
100.0%
each
100.0%
other,
99.9%
to
99.9%
trust
100.0%
that
99.7%
she
100.0%
won't
99.6%
abandon
100.0%
him
100.0%
without
100.0%
it
73.4%
being
77.7%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
known
100.0%
setup
99.5%
of
99.9%
a
99.7%
relationship.
99.9%
It's
95.9%
Anne
96.1%
who
99.9%
puts
99.4%
it
99.8%
to
99.8%
him
100.0%
plainly
100.0%
when
99.9%
she
100.0%
inevitably
99.5%
accepts
99.9%
her
99.9%
queerness
98.8%
and
100.0%
realizes
83.9%
that
99.4%
they
99.9%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
change
100.0%
the
100.0%
nature
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
99.7%
connection
100.0%
away
100.0%
from
100.0%
romantic
91.9%
and
99.7%
sexual
99.7%
to
100.0%
something
100.0%
else
100.0%
just
99.9%
as
100.0%
important
100.0%
to
99.9%
her.
99.7%
Telling
99.2%
him,
90.3%
I
99.9%
was
100.0%
in
100.0%
every
100.0%
tavern
99.9%
in
99.9%
that
99.5%
town
100.0%
trying
99.8%
to
100.0%
find
100.0%
our
85.4%
spies,
99.8%
build
86.5%
out
99.4%
this
99.9%
thing
99.9%
we
99.9%
started.
100.0%
And
99.5%
every
100.0%
time
99.9%
I
100.0%
said
99.9%
my
89.0%
name,
100.0%
they
99.9%
knew
100.0%
my
100.0%
name.
100.0%
The
98.8%
first
100.0%
thing
99.9%
that
98.7%
they
100.0%
said
100.0%
every
100.0%
time
100.0%
was
100.0%
your
99.4%
name.
99.9%
Like
99.8%
we
99.1%
was
94.0%
two
99.6%
halves
95.7%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
thing.
98.1%
I
99.8%
can't
100.0%
be
100.0%
your
98.0%
wife,
100.0%
Jack,
98.8%
but
99.6%
you
100.0%
and
100.0%
I
100.0%
are
100.0%
going
75.5%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
partners
100.0%
until
99.2%
they
99.9%
put
100.0%
us
100.0%
in
99.3%
the
99.9%
fucking
84.4%
ground.
100.0%
There
99.9%
is
99.7%
such
100.0%
potential
100.0%
freedom
85.4%
and
97.4%
intimacy
100.0%
in
99.0%
these
100.0%
ideas
99.2%
are
94.3%
being
99.9%
allowed.
79.7%
Allowed
97.7%
to
100.0%
explore
100.0%
doing
99.9%
relationships
99.9%
that
99.8%
work
100.0%
for
100.0%
individuals
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
assuming
98.8%
that
99.5%
they
100.0%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
prescribe
90.0%
to
99.9%
existing
92.5%
molds
91.4%
of
100.0%
monogamy.
100.0%
There's
90.7%
interesting
100.0%
evidence
98.0%
of
100.0%
just
100.0%
this
86.7%
in
99.6%
the
100.0%
crossover
100.0%
and
99.8%
solidarity
100.0%
that
99.9%
exists
99.9%
between
100.0%
the
100.0%
poly
83.8%
community
99.7%
and
99.9%
the
99.8%
asexual
97.2%
and
99.4%
aromantic
99.9%
communities.
81.0%
The
99.9%
similarities
100.0%
of
99.9%
experiences
99.9%
are
99.5%
so
99.9%
stark
75.7%
to
100.0%
me.
99.5%
Like
97.3%
the
100.0%
invalidation
99.8%
of
100.0%
intimate
100.0%
relationships
100.0%
that
100.0%
don't
100.0%
fit
100.0%
the
100.0%
norm.
99.7%
The
100.0%
way
100.0%
you
100.0%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
go
100.0%
through
100.0%
a
100.0%
process
100.0%
of
100.0%
questioning
100.0%
and
99.9%
breaking
100.0%
down
100.0%
assumptions
88.8%
about
100.0%
what
100.0%
is
100.0%
necessary
89.3%
within
100.0%
those
100.0%
relationships
99.9%
and
99.7%
at
43.3%
the
34.5%
outside
98.4%
of
99.9%
them.
99.9%
It
100.0%
might
100.0%
seem
100.0%
like
100.0%
there
100.0%
would
99.9%
be
100.0%
a
99.9%
separation
100.0%
there.
99.9%
But
99.7%
actually
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
find
100.0%
themselves
100.0%
as
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
both
100.0%
communities.
97.0%
Ace
97.3%
people
99.8%
who
100.0%
are
100.0%
uninterested
94.8%
in
100.0%
sex
96.6%
with
100.0%
their
100.0%
romantic
97.6%
partners,
99.9%
opening
100.0%
up
99.9%
that
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
99.7%
relationship.
99.8%
Aromantic
99.5%
people
100.0%
in
99.8%
poly
90.5%
queer
99.9%
platonic
86.4%
dynamics
100.0%
with
100.0%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
one
100.0%
person
99.8%
aro
87.8%
ace
53.7%
people
99.9%
within
99.8%
polycules
89.0%
which
99.9%
allow
100.0%
for
99.9%
them
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
as
99.9%
equally
81.1%
connected
99.8%
and
98.9%
supported
100.0%
by
100.0%
their
100.0%
partners
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
99.9%
be
99.9%
cut
99.7%
off
100.0%
from
100.0%
familial
99.8%
intimacy
96.8%
because
100.0%
they
99.9%
can't
99.9%
provide
100.0%
traditional
100.0%
Expectations
93.2%
of
93.5%
sex
99.7%
and
100.0%
romance.
99.2%
One
100.0%
of
100.0%
my
100.0%
favorite
72.4%
portrayals
94.8%
of
100.0%
this
99.8%
kind
99.8%
of
100.0%
ethical
100.0%
non
99.8%
monogamy
99.7%
that
99.5%
I've
100.0%
seen
100.0%
as
99.6%
an
99.9%
ace
87.6%
person
98.9%
myself
99.8%
is
99.7%
in
99.1%
Everything
100.0%
Is
98.8%
Going
99.9%
to
99.8%
Be
99.9%
okay.
98.8%
It's
99.9%
a
100.0%
brilliant
99.6%
comedy
100.0%
show
100.0%
from
99.8%
Australian
99.8%
writer
100.0%
and
94.0%
actor,
100.0%
uh,
88.6%
Josh
100.0%
Thomas
100.0%
about
99.9%
a
99.9%
man
100.0%
who
99.9%
unexpectedly
100.0%
becomes
100.0%
the
100.0%
guardian
100.0%
of
100.0%
his
100.0%
two
99.8%
teen
99.5%
half
100.0%
sisters
100.0%
after
100.0%
their
99.7%
dad
100.0%
dies.
99.9%
One
99.9%
of
99.9%
the
99.4%
sisters,
91.0%
Matilda,
98.4%
ends
100.0%
up
100.0%
starting
100.0%
a
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
with
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
her
99.9%
best
100.0%
friends,
99.6%
another
98.7%
autistic
100.0%
girl
99.9%
named
100.0%
Drea.
66.6%
However,
100.0%
she
99.9%
realizes
97.3%
that
100.0%
although
100.0%
she,
78.5%
she
93.5%
loves
100.0%
being
100.0%
in
100.0%
this
99.7%
intimate
100.0%
relationship
100.0%
with
100.0%
Dreya,
82.5%
she
99.9%
isn't
100.0%
attracted
89.3%
to
100.0%
her
100.0%
sexually.
99.6%
She
61.9%
doesn't
98.7%
want
93.4%
to
95.3%
have
100.0%
sex
98.9%
with
100.0%
her
100.0%
at
99.8%
all.
100.0%
Andrea,
93.4%
in
99.9%
turn,
99.9%
realizes
89.7%
that
99.5%
she's
99.9%
an
99.8%
asexual
99.8%
lesbian.
100.0%
But
99.9%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
breaking
100.0%
up,
100.0%
assuming
100.0%
that
99.7%
these
99.9%
labels
100.0%
were
94.2%
incompatible
100.0%
with
100.0%
what
100.0%
a
99.4%
relationship
100.0%
should
100.0%
look
100.0%
like,
100.0%
they
100.0%
figure
100.0%
out
100.0%
a
100.0%
way
100.0%
to
100.0%
create
100.0%
a
100.0%
partnership
95.6%
that
99.9%
works
100.0%
for
100.0%
them
99.9%
both.
99.9%
With
99.9%
Matilda
95.4%
exploring
88.4%
sexual
99.3%
hookups
99.6%
with
100.0%
guys
100.0%
that
98.1%
they
99.9%
meet
100.0%
on
100.0%
dating
100.0%
apps
99.9%
in
99.9%
a
99.9%
communicative
100.0%
open
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
Diverse
99.9%
representations
99.5%
of
99.5%
polyamory
89.8%
help
100.0%
expand
100.0%
our,
100.0%
uh,
68.6%
cultural
100.0%
ideas
99.9%
around
99.9%
who
99.9%
polyam
94.4%
yammery
60.9%
is
99.9%
for.
99.5%
Especially
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
100.0%
it
100.0%
is
99.9%
for
99.9%
only
100.0%
certain
100.0%
types
93.4%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
at
99.9%
all.
99.9%
I
99.8%
guess
100.0%
as
100.0%
someone
100.0%
who
100.0%
like,
98.4%
ticks
98.3%
many
100.0%
boxes
93.6%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
kind
98.3%
of
100.0%
diversity
99.1%
checklist,
99.7%
like,
95.3%
you
97.6%
know,
99.6%
like
97.9%
I'm,
92.0%
um,
99.8%
you
99.7%
know,
100.0%
I'm,
89.7%
I'm,
94.8%
I'm
96.7%
autistic
100.0%
and
98.3%
adhd.
84.7%
So
100.0%
yeah,
100.0%
I
100.0%
guess,
100.0%
you
99.8%
know,
100.0%
I'm
98.6%
undisabled,
98.5%
I'm
99.9%
queer,
86.2%
I'm
98.5%
bisexual.
100.0%
Right.
99.7%
Um,
99.7%
I'm
99.8%
like
99.3%
a
61.7%
woman
99.7%
of
99.9%
color,
93.3%
a
91.5%
woman
99.7%
with
100.0%
a
100.0%
massive
100.0%
asterisk,
97.1%
but
100.0%
we
100.0%
can
100.0%
ignore
100.0%
that
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
moment.
100.0%
Um,
99.5%
and
99.9%
I'm
100.0%
also
100.0%
polyamorous.
91.6%
Um,
99.7%
um,
79.6%
I
97.4%
have
99.8%
a
99.8%
lot,
99.9%
I
99.7%
have
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
thoughts
100.0%
about
70.6%
this.
100.0%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
that,
100.0%
you
99.6%
know,
100.0%
for
100.0%
me,
100.0%
like,
99.7%
as
100.0%
a
99.9%
kind
99.9%
of
81.7%
polyamorous
93.0%
person
100.0%
of
100.0%
color,
72.2%
when
100.0%
I
100.0%
was
100.0%
kind
99.9%
of
99.6%
dealing
100.0%
with
100.0%
like
99.6%
talking
94.0%
to
100.0%
my
100.0%
family
100.0%
about
86.7%
these
100.0%
concepts,
89.6%
uh,
84.3%
there
100.0%
was
100.0%
this
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
100.0%
like
99.5%
polyamory
92.0%
was
100.0%
like
99.4%
a
100.0%
white
100.0%
thing
100.0%
to
100.0%
do.
100.0%
Um,
99.8%
and
99.8%
even
100.0%
though
100.0%
you
99.4%
know,
100.0%
historically
100.0%
like,
99.3%
you
98.7%
know,
100.0%
like
97.7%
people
100.0%
of
100.0%
color,
73.8%
like
92.3%
especially
99.8%
indigenous
100.0%
tribes,
99.8%
like
99.1%
they
100.0%
practice
81.8%
various
100.0%
forms
100.0%
of
100.0%
non
69.1%
monogamy,
96.1%
like
98.7%
you
99.5%
know,
100.0%
and
99.0%
there's
98.8%
um,
98.7%
like,
96.7%
there's,
90.1%
there's
99.2%
like
99.6%
a
100.0%
matriarchal,
99.2%
uh,
92.6%
like
98.9%
polyandrust
81.4%
tribe
85.4%
in
100.0%
China
100.0%
somewhere,
99.2%
so
100.0%
it's
100.0%
not
100.0%
like
99.5%
unheard
99.3%
of.
100.0%
Um,
90.2%
but
99.9%
um,
99.9%
yeah,
99.8%
like,
95.2%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
like
97.9%
just
100.0%
dealing
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
100.0%
intersection
100.0%
between
100.0%
like
96.2%
kind
99.9%
of
100.0%
race,
97.3%
uh,
90.4%
and
99.8%
non
99.9%
monogamy
99.7%
has
99.8%
been
100.0%
interesting
82.5%
in
100.0%
that
100.0%
way.
99.9%
While
99.7%
researching
100.0%
for
99.9%
this
100.0%
video,
100.0%
the
100.0%
main
100.0%
thing
100.0%
that
100.0%
came
100.0%
back
100.0%
again
100.0%
and
95.5%
again
100.0%
with
100.0%
examples
99.1%
I
100.0%
found
100.0%
was
100.0%
how
100.0%
fleeting
100.0%
and
79.8%
random
100.0%
they
99.9%
seemed.
99.8%
There
85.8%
didn't
85.1%
seem
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.9%
real
99.3%
consistent
100.0%
overarching
100.0%
flow
100.0%
between
100.0%
different,
96.1%
different
71.5%
iconic
99.8%
characters
100.0%
and
99.6%
shows.
100.0%
Instead
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
examples
100.0%
like
99.9%
Geri's
79.0%
parents
100.0%
and
96.9%
Rick
99.9%
and
99.9%
Morty,
76.5%
who
99.9%
turn
100.0%
up
99.3%
kind
94.8%
of
95.8%
a
96.3%
funny
100.0%
way
100.0%
of
99.9%
calling
100.0%
Geri
64.9%
uncool
93.3%
for
99.9%
like
94.0%
not
100.0%
being
100.0%
chill
99.0%
about
100.0%
their
99.9%
partner
100.0%
Jacob
99.8%
or
99.8%
one
99.2%
off
65.8%
films
99.9%
like
99.9%
Professor
99.8%
Marsden
99.9%
and
98.1%
the
99.8%
Wonder
98.3%
Woman,
99.9%
which
99.8%
was
100.0%
inspired
100.0%
by
100.0%
the
100.0%
real
100.0%
life
99.8%
creator
100.0%
of
100.0%
Wonder
99.7%
Woman.
99.9%
It
99.9%
was
100.0%
pretty
100.0%
well
100.0%
received
100.0%
by
100.0%
poly
98.9%
audiences,
99.9%
but
100.0%
hasn't
99.9%
resulted
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
84.6%
continued
100.0%
legacy
100.0%
of
100.0%
wider
99.4%
poly
99.3%
representation
99.9%
that
99.9%
we
100.0%
might
100.0%
follow
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
way
100.0%
that
99.7%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
with
99.7%
queer
99.2%
representation
100.0%
in
99.6%
the
99.7%
celluloid
98.9%
closet
99.8%
style
84.8%
documentaries.
98.0%
And
98.9%
that
99.9%
itself
99.9%
is
100.0%
indicative
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
way
100.0%
that
98.7%
polyamory
100.0%
is
100.0%
seen
100.0%
as
100.0%
an
99.9%
individualistic
99.9%
and
99.9%
self
100.0%
absorbed
98.3%
decision
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
a
100.0%
legitimate
100.0%
dynamic
99.4%
that
99.9%
can
100.0%
in
99.8%
reality
100.0%
create
100.0%
webs
100.0%
of
100.0%
interwoven
91.2%
community.
99.9%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
that
97.3%
the
99.8%
hope
100.0%
seems
99.9%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
for
99.9%
polyamorous
99.0%
representation
99.9%
where
99.9%
being
100.0%
poly
97.1%
is
99.9%
not
100.0%
entirely
100.0%
where
100.0%
the
99.8%
crises
93.4%
and
99.1%
drama
78.9%
is
99.6%
drawn
86.4%
from.
99.2%
People,
100.0%
um,
98.5%
like
99.9%
to
100.0%
make
100.0%
polyamory
89.8%
the
99.9%
center
85.2%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
story's
98.6%
drama
100.0%
when
99.6%
actually
99.7%
what
97.7%
I
99.5%
would
95.8%
say
26.3%
love
100.0%
is
99.9%
for,
99.9%
you
92.4%
know,
100.0%
more
100.0%
representation
100.0%
of
100.0%
like
94.6%
polyamorous
99.8%
people
100.0%
just
99.8%
existing
99.9%
and
99.8%
then
99.8%
you
98.4%
know,
99.2%
like
97.1%
the
100.0%
conflicts
98.4%
and
99.7%
the
99.8%
drama
85.3%
that's
100.0%
happening
94.0%
is
99.8%
not
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
with
100.0%
their
100.0%
relationship.
100.0%
Like
97.6%
they're
99.6%
like,
97.1%
you
97.2%
know,
100.0%
people
100.0%
who
99.9%
are
100.0%
like
89.3%
facing
100.0%
this
100.0%
together,
100.0%
like
94.6%
as
99.9%
a
53.1%
polycure.
88.7%
I
99.6%
think
100.0%
there's
99.6%
such
100.0%
potential
100.0%
in
99.9%
healthy
100.0%
non
100.0%
monogamous
100.0%
representation
99.9%
to
100.0%
highlight
99.9%
a
94.8%
need
100.0%
for
100.0%
better
100.0%
communication
91.0%
between
100.0%
partners,
100.0%
whether
99.9%
poly
99.8%
or
99.9%
not,
99.9%
without
100.0%
foregone
99.5%
conclusions
94.7%
and
77.7%
assumptions
100.0%
of
99.9%
how
100.0%
any
100.0%
aspect
97.4%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
relationship
100.0%
should
99.6%
work.
94.9%
At
99.1%
its
98.9%
best
100.0%
it
100.0%
might
100.0%
allow
100.0%
more
100.0%
people
100.0%
to
100.0%
explore
100.0%
ways
100.0%
in
100.0%
which
100.0%
their
100.0%
relationships
99.9%
can
100.0%
be
100.0%
focused
100.0%
on
100.0%
real
100.0%
needs
100.0%
and
96.7%
desires
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
set
100.0%
models
76.5%
and
98.3%
default
99.9%
expectations.
100.0%
And
99.8%
at
99.9%
its
99.8%
best
100.0%
it
100.0%
might
100.0%
allow
100.0%
more
100.0%
people
100.0%
to
100.0%
explore
99.8%
ways
100.0%
in
100.0%
which
100.0%
their
99.7%
relationships,
99.9%
all
94.2%
their
99.9%
relationships
99.8%
can
99.9%
be
100.0%
focused
99.4%
on
100.0%
real
100.0%
needs
100.0%
and
94.0%
desires
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
set
100.0%
models
99.9%
and
100.0%
default
100.0%
expectations.
100.0%
Thank
99.9%
you
62.3%
so
100.0%
much
100.0%
for
100.0%
watching.
99.6%
I
100.0%
would
100.0%
love
100.0%
to
99.9%
hear
100.0%
your
100.0%
thoughts
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
comments
100.0%
and
99.9%
if
100.0%
you
100.0%
would
99.9%
like
100.0%
to
100.0%
help
100.0%
support
100.0%
me
100.0%
make
100.0%
videos
100.0%
like
100.0%
this
100.0%
one
99.8%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
future
100.0%
then
99.9%
I
100.0%
will
99.9%
leave
100.0%
a
100.0%
link
100.0%
to
100.0%
my
100.0%
Patreon
100.0%
and
99.7%
Ko
100.0%
Fi
92.5%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
description.
98.9%
Also
99.4%
off
98.9%
the
100.0%
back
99.9%
of
99.9%
working
95.3%
working
92.7%
on
100.0%
this
100.0%
video,
99.9%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
that
99.9%
I
100.0%
am
99.9%
going
99.7%
to
100.0%
end
100.0%
up
100.0%
working
100.0%
on
100.0%
a
100.0%
video
100.0%
around
99.8%
aromanticism.
99.7%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
that
99.9%
there's
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
crossover
99.9%
with
100.0%
this
100.0%
and
100.0%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
like
94.0%
breaking
100.0%
down
100.0%
what
100.0%
exactly
100.0%
is
100.0%
romance?
99.8%
What
99.8%
is
99.9%
it
100.0%
for?
100.0%
So
97.4%
look
100.0%
out
99.9%
for
100.0%
that.
99.8%
That
100.0%
will
100.0%
be
100.0%
coming
100.0%
hopefully
100.0%
later
100.0%
this
100.0%
year.
100.0%
Also
99.8%
on
82.3%
my
100.0%
Patreon
91.8%
I've
99.7%
been
100.0%
experimenting
99.2%
with
100.0%
behind
99.9%
the
100.0%
scenes
99.5%
videos
99.7%
that
99.9%
I
100.0%
film
100.0%
after
100.0%
filming
100.0%
the
100.0%
main
100.0%
video.
99.8%
So
98.3%
I'm
87.4%
about
100.0%
to
100.0%
go
100.0%
into
99.9%
doing
100.0%
one
99.1%
now,
100.0%
which
100.0%
are
99.9%
looking
100.0%
at
100.0%
like,
93.2%
things
100.0%
we
99.9%
didn't
100.0%
have
100.0%
time
100.0%
to
100.0%
include
99.8%
any
99.9%
other
100.0%
thought.
99.5%
Sort
99.5%
of
99.9%
an
99.7%
expansion
84.9%
of
100.0%
stuff
100.0%
that
100.0%
didn't
100.0%
make
100.0%
it
100.0%
into
100.0%
the
100.0%
actual
99.2%
video
100.0%
essay.
84.1%
And
92.0%
there
100.0%
are
99.3%
some
100.0%
really,
99.7%
really
100.0%
cool
100.0%
perks
87.1%
that
100.0%
come
100.0%
along
100.0%
with
100.0%
being
100.0%
a,
99.7%
ah,
57.0%
patron,
93.2%
including
100.0%
access
99.9%
to
100.0%
my
100.0%
discord.
99.9%
There's
99.6%
Care
100.0%
Pac,
99.6%
there's
96.4%
postcards,
84.1%
there's
99.9%
a
100.0%
recommendation
99.8%
list
99.9%
that
97.3%
I
100.0%
send
99.9%
out
100.0%
every
100.0%
month
100.0%
with
100.0%
different,
100.0%
like
88.0%
TV
99.9%
shows,
100.0%
movies,
100.0%
plays,
99.9%
books,
99.9%
podcasts
99.9%
that
92.2%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
you
100.0%
should
100.0%
check
100.0%
out.
99.9%
And
99.6%
until
100.0%
I
99.9%
see
100.0%
you
98.4%
next
100.0%
time,
99.9%
bye.
98.5%

SpeechMog

Hoverest AB (5594118548)

Email: hugo.contact01@gmail.com