SPEECHMOG

Analyze

My Analyses

Examples

Buy

(Analyzed: full video)

Analysis

Material name: "rowan-ellis__chatgpt-capitalism-could-ai-take-every-job"

Bandwidth

14.96

Chars/s

High

Flow

94.57

%

Outstanding

Clarity Score

94.04

%

Very high

Complexity

450.65

Chars^2

Extremely high

Speaking pace

How fast you speak and how much this varies over time. Only counting speaking segments (separated by silences longer than 5000ms).

00:00 62:50
Avg WPM
195.4
Total words
12281
Enabled minutes
62.84 min
WPM std dev
29.5
WPM std dev (%)
15.1
Speaking segments
1

Pronunciation Clarity

How confidently the transcription model understood your words.

Avg AI clarity
0.983
AI Clarity std dev
0.058
Words counted
12281

Pause metrics

Detected pauses (larger than 500ms) between words inside speaking segments.

00:00 62:50
Num pauses
111
Avg pause
805 ms
Median pause
700 ms
Total pause time
89380 ms
Pause ratio
2.4%
Pauses / minute
1.77
Enabled minutes
62.84 min

Long Pauses Metrics

Detected longer pauses (larger than 2000ms) between words inside speaking segments.

00:00 62:50
Num pauses
2
Avg pause
3920 ms
Median pause
3920 ms
Total pause time
7840 ms
Pause ratio
0.2%
Pauses / minute
0.03
Enabled minutes
62.84 min

Filler words

How often you use sounds like “um” or “uh”.

00:00 62:50
Total words
12281
Filler count
29
Filler ratio
0.24%

Filler examples

Uh,, 07:45, (99%)um,, 08:03, (98%)um,, 08:51, (99%)um,, 08:58, (100%)uh,, 09:00, (88%)um,, 09:14, (99%)uh,, 10:01, (97%)um,, 20:06, (96%)Uh,, 20:31, (95%)uh,, 23:29, (99%)um,, 27:53, (98%)um,, 28:06, (96%)M, 28:42, (86%)uh,, 28:59, (91%)Um,, 30:07, (95%)um,, 30:55, (97%)uh,, 31:33, (84%)uh,, 32:54, (92%)Uh,, 33:43, (98%)um,, 35:15, (99%) + 9 more…

Vocabulary

How rich and varied your word choice is.

Total words
12281
Unique words
2522
Vocabulary by time (Root TTR)
22.758
Speaking minutes
62.84 min
Avg word length
4.59 chars

Most frequent words

"the" × 564"to" × 398"of" × 350"and" × 329"that" × 259"a" × 252"in" × 187"ai" × 175"it" × 163"is" × 150"i" × 128"for" × 126"this" × 125"be" × 98"with" × 98

Phrasing

How you group words into sentences and clauses.

Sentences
597
Avg sentence length
20.6 words
Shortest sentence
1 words
Longest sentence
88 words
Subsentences
1287
Avg subsentence length
9.5 words
Shortest subsentence
1 words
Longest subsentence
40 words

Entire Lyrics

All lyrics colored after their clarity. The stronger blue, the more unclear the word was perceived to be.

Tomorrow's
99.9%
World
100.0%
was
99.9%
a
100.0%
television
99.9%
program
100.0%
that
100.0%
predicted
100.0%
the
100.0%
future
99.9%
and
99.9%
invited
100.0%
inventors,
100.0%
engineers
99.9%
and
99.9%
experts
96.4%
to
100.0%
showcase
100.0%
the
100.0%
latest
100.0%
technology
100.0%
that
100.0%
might
99.9%
have
100.0%
an
99.8%
impact
100.0%
on
99.9%
our
100.0%
lives.
99.8%
The
100.0%
British
99.9%
public
100.0%
was
99.9%
introduced
86.3%
to
99.9%
the
99.7%
home
100.0%
computer
89.3%
and
99.9%
the
98.8%
smartphone
99.9%
through
100.0%
this
98.7%
show,
100.0%
which
99.4%
ran
100.0%
from
100.0%
1965
100.0%
to
99.6%
2003.
87.4%
When
100.0%
I
99.9%
started
99.9%
researching
100.0%
this
99.6%
video,
99.9%
I
100.0%
joked
99.4%
that
99.6%
I
100.0%
could
100.0%
recreate
77.7%
a
99.5%
mock
95.4%
up
61.8%
Tomorrow's
93.3%
World
99.9%
segment
99.8%
talking
85.3%
about
100.0%
AI.
99.7%
But
99.4%
it
98.9%
turns
100.0%
out
99.9%
I
94.6%
didn't
100.0%
have
99.9%
to.
99.4%
Oh,
51.1%
it's
97.9%
taken
95.9%
me
99.9%
hours
99.9%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
this
99.9%
far
99.1%
on
43.2%
my
99.3%
cv.
99.9%
So
96.6%
when
99.7%
I
99.9%
finished
90.4%
this
99.7%
masterpiece,
100.0%
I'd
96.0%
quite
98.5%
like
99.9%
to
99.3%
think
99.9%
it'd
79.7%
be
99.9%
looked
99.9%
at
98.6%
by
99.8%
an
99.7%
expert.
99.9%
You
93.8%
know,
100.0%
someone
77.7%
who'd
95.3%
spot
84.1%
that
98.2%
spark
99.9%
of
93.2%
genius
100.0%
between
99.8%
the
99.7%
lines.
99.9%
So
98.7%
I'm
99.5%
m
74.9%
not
100.0%
too
98.1%
sure
100.0%
about
95.5%
it
95.8%
being
96.5%
read
99.3%
and
99.8%
analyzed
92.5%
by
99.9%
a
98.8%
machine.
100.0%
But
98.5%
this
99.7%
machine
100.0%
can
99.9%
take
100.0%
paper
99.9%
CVs,
94.2%
scan
99.7%
and
99.9%
understand
100.0%
them
99.6%
in
99.8%
seconds,
100.0%
select
99.9%
interviewees
99.9%
and
99.7%
even
99.1%
send
99.4%
out
99.4%
rejection
95.1%
letters
86.3%
without
99.9%
a
97.7%
human
99.9%
being
59.1%
involved
79.7%
at
98.1%
all.
99.8%
Now,
98.2%
here
99.1%
in
99.7%
the
99.2%
UK,
99.9%
15
99.9%
companies
99.8%
have
98.7%
installed
99.8%
the
74.9%
recruiting
98.6%
computer.
100.0%
The
99.5%
designers
96.4%
say
99.2%
it
98.4%
saves
99.8%
time
99.9%
and
97.0%
can
98.3%
pick
99.4%
out
82.5%
a
98.2%
short
99.8%
list
74.2%
as
99.5%
well
99.7%
as
99.4%
any
99.8%
professional.
99.7%
Some
99.5%
are
99.2%
worried
99.9%
about
98.1%
the
97.8%
potential
81.1%
for
97.4%
unfair
99.9%
bias.
99.8%
It
98.8%
does
96.1%
make
99.2%
it
92.6%
a
93.5%
lot
64.3%
easier,
99.5%
I
74.9%
think,
99.9%
to
97.1%
discriminate.
99.7%
You
50.8%
can
85.0%
just
91.9%
say
97.3%
the
98.3%
machine
99.7%
shows
93.7%
that
44.0%
it's
93.6%
all
99.0%
fair.
99.7%
Everyone
97.1%
had
98.3%
a
97.9%
fair
99.0%
go,
97.7%
uh,
66.7%
when
49.0%
in
86.0%
fact
100.0%
you
94.9%
could
94.5%
program
100.0%
into
97.9%
it
97.6%
whatever
83.9%
you
78.1%
wanted.
92.0%
So
94.4%
what
99.8%
do
71.1%
the
99.2%
system's
87.3%
designers
96.4%
say
99.9%
to
98.8%
that?
99.5%
The
99.7%
system
100.0%
itself
97.9%
is,
99.1%
uh,
82.9%
totally
99.5%
non
99.4%
discriminatory.
99.5%
If
98.7%
it
99.4%
can
99.0%
be
99.4%
used
99.7%
for
99.7%
positive
99.9%
discrimination,
95.3%
surely
97.6%
information
99.9%
can
98.5%
be
99.1%
put
99.9%
in
96.0%
for
99.8%
negative
98.1%
discrimination,
99.9%
right?
91.0%
Their
76.6%
new
99.6%
online
99.4%
recruiting
83.2%
tool
99.9%
did
98.1%
not
99.9%
like
81.7%
women.
98.6%
Male
80.9%
candidates
94.5%
were
99.2%
preferable.
99.8%
What
99.4%
is
99.8%
AI?
99.8%
AI
99.9%
seems
99.9%
to
99.8%
be
100.0%
everywhere
98.4%
right
99.6%
now,
97.7%
from
99.8%
ChatGPT
99.3%
to
100.0%
MidJourney.
97.7%
We're
99.6%
hearing
100.0%
it
98.0%
being
100.0%
used
100.0%
by
100.0%
everyone
99.7%
from
100.0%
students
100.0%
to
100.0%
lawyers.
100.0%
But
99.9%
what
99.6%
exactly
99.9%
is
100.0%
it?
99.6%
Broadly
100.0%
speaking,
100.0%
artificial
96.3%
intelligence
94.4%
is
100.0%
anything
97.7%
that
100.0%
allows
100.0%
computers
100.0%
to
99.6%
perform
99.7%
tasks
99.8%
that
99.8%
previously
99.9%
required
100.0%
human
100.0%
intelligence.
96.8%
One
99.9%
subset
99.8%
of
100.0%
AI
99.9%
is
99.6%
machine
100.0%
learning.
99.8%
So
98.2%
most
100.0%
computers,
99.9%
analog
98.4%
and
100.0%
digital,
99.9%
are
99.3%
never
99.9%
going
99.8%
to
99.9%
get
99.8%
better
100.0%
at
100.0%
executing
100.0%
their
99.8%
various
99.9%
functions.
87.9%
A
99.8%
calculator
100.0%
is
99.4%
not
97.2%
going
92.8%
to
99.0%
get
99.5%
better
99.9%
at
99.8%
maths
98.7%
the
99.6%
longer
100.0%
that
60.7%
you
99.8%
have
99.9%
it.
89.2%
Ah,
90.6%
from
99.4%
day
100.0%
one
100.0%
it's
93.9%
already
99.5%
achieved
95.4%
its
97.2%
full
99.4%
calculator
88.3%
potential.
99.7%
If
100.0%
you
100.0%
want
99.7%
to
98.8%
improve
100.0%
its
98.7%
functions,
99.4%
then
98.4%
you'd
98.3%
have
99.5%
to
100.0%
fundamentally
95.1%
alter
100.0%
it
98.4%
in
99.6%
some
99.9%
way.
99.1%
The
99.6%
same
100.0%
goes
100.0%
for
99.6%
your
99.1%
laptop
97.2%
or
99.3%
your
90.3%
phone.
100.0%
But
88.1%
machine
100.0%
learning
100.0%
is
99.9%
what
99.9%
most
99.8%
people
99.9%
now
96.7%
think
100.0%
of
99.9%
when
99.9%
they
99.5%
hear
100.0%
the
99.6%
term
100.0%
AI.
97.8%
It
99.7%
basically
86.5%
allows
100.0%
a
96.3%
program
100.0%
to
97.4%
improve
99.8%
over
99.9%
time
99.8%
as
100.0%
it's
96.2%
exposed
100.0%
to
99.7%
and
81.7%
trained
100.0%
to
100.0%
interpret
99.9%
more
100.0%
and
99.5%
more
100.0%
data.
99.9%
Let's
97.3%
say
100.0%
you
99.8%
wanted
99.8%
to
99.9%
create
99.9%
A
99.9%
program
100.0%
that
99.6%
is
98.5%
really
99.9%
good
99.9%
at
70.4%
identifying
100.0%
images
100.0%
of
99.9%
bicycles.
91.6%
You'd
99.7%
create
100.0%
your
96.9%
program
100.0%
and
100.0%
start
99.9%
exposing
100.0%
it
99.9%
to
100.0%
images.
99.9%
At
99.8%
first
100.0%
it's
95.9%
going
74.1%
to
99.8%
be
99.7%
pretty
99.8%
bad
100.0%
at,
98.3%
uh,
99.5%
identifying
90.1%
bicycles,
99.9%
but
99.9%
you
100.0%
can
99.8%
train
100.0%
it.
99.8%
Like
95.8%
maybe
85.2%
you
99.7%
outsource
97.4%
your
99.8%
training
100.0%
using
99.9%
Captcha
98.2%
and
99.0%
make
99.7%
millions
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
trying
99.8%
to
99.9%
log
100.0%
into
90.7%
their
99.9%
Gmail
98.5%
account
100.0%
click
99.7%
pictures
99.9%
containing
100.0%
bicycles.
99.9%
This
99.9%
gives
100.0%
that
98.5%
software
100.0%
new
100.0%
data
100.0%
about
100.0%
what
99.9%
is
99.9%
and
99.7%
what
98.4%
isn't
100.0%
a
100.0%
bike.
99.6%
And
98.4%
after
100.0%
a
99.2%
while,
100.0%
the
99.3%
software
100.0%
will
99.8%
become
99.7%
really
99.5%
good
100.0%
at
99.9%
knowing
100.0%
what
98.5%
a
92.3%
bike
99.4%
is.
98.1%
Not
100.0%
only
100.0%
that,
100.0%
but
99.7%
after
100.0%
it's
99.0%
been
99.8%
exposed
100.0%
to
100.0%
enough
100.0%
data,
100.0%
the
55.8%
software
99.9%
might
99.5%
be
99.8%
able
100.0%
to
95.8%
generate
100.0%
images
100.0%
of
99.9%
bikes,
99.9%
create
100.0%
original
100.0%
designs
99.9%
for
99.1%
bicycles.
98.5%
And
97.9%
that
99.6%
is
99.0%
called
99.9%
deep
99.9%
learning,
99.0%
a
99.8%
subset
100.0%
within
99.9%
machine
100.0%
learning
100.0%
itself.
99.8%
This
99.8%
includes
100.0%
unsupervised,
90.3%
um,
89.3%
learning,
99.2%
meaning
100.0%
an
98.7%
AI
99.9%
can
77.6%
analyze
92.1%
large
100.0%
amounts
100.0%
of
100.0%
data
100.0%
more
100.0%
deeply
100.0%
and
81.7%
reveal
100.0%
new
100.0%
insights
84.7%
for
99.9%
which
100.0%
it
99.9%
might
99.7%
not
100.0%
have
99.8%
been
100.0%
trained.
99.5%
For
99.8%
example,
90.1%
consider
100.0%
a
100.0%
deep
100.0%
learning
100.0%
model
100.0%
that
100.0%
is
99.9%
trained
100.0%
to
100.0%
analyze
96.8%
consumer
99.9%
purchases.
99.8%
The
99.6%
model
100.0%
has
100.0%
data
100.0%
only
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
98.9%
items
100.0%
you
99.8%
have
98.7%
already
99.9%
purchased.
99.9%
However,
100.0%
the
99.9%
artificial
90.9%
neural
99.9%
network
100.0%
can
99.9%
suggest
100.0%
new
99.7%
items,
91.2%
items
90.1%
that
98.4%
you
100.0%
haven't
100.0%
bought,
100.0%
by
100.0%
comparing
100.0%
your
99.9%
buying
93.4%
patterns
99.9%
to
100.0%
those
100.0%
of
100.0%
other
100.0%
similar
100.0%
customers.
99.9%
That
99.8%
particular
99.5%
quote
100.0%
comes
99.8%
from
92.4%
Amazon's
99.7%
FAQ
99.7%
page.
99.4%
I
99.8%
kid
99.9%
you
100.0%
not.
99.7%
I
99.7%
guess
100.0%
at
99.9%
least
100.0%
the
99.8%
site
100.0%
using
100.0%
your
100.0%
data
100.0%
to
100.0%
sell
100.0%
you
99.7%
more
99.8%
things
100.0%
more
100.0%
efficiently
100.0%
is
99.8%
pretty
100.0%
good
100.0%
at
99.8%
explaining
100.0%
how
100.0%
it
100.0%
does
99.8%
it.
99.6%
When
100.0%
I
100.0%
started
100.0%
researching
100.0%
this
99.9%
video,
100.0%
I
100.0%
knew
100.0%
pretty
99.9%
quickly
100.0%
that
99.9%
I
100.0%
wanted
100.0%
to
100.0%
focus
100.0%
in
99.7%
on
100.0%
how
100.0%
AI
100.0%
was
100.0%
affecting
88.7%
people's
99.9%
jobs
100.0%
as
100.0%
well
100.0%
as
100.0%
the
100.0%
world
100.0%
of
100.0%
work
100.0%
in
100.0%
general.
99.9%
The
100.0%
most
100.0%
obvious
100.0%
question
100.0%
being
65.0%
what
99.9%
jobs
100.0%
can
100.0%
AI
99.9%
actually
100.0%
do?
99.9%
The
98.6%
artist.
97.0%
First,
99.8%
let's
99.8%
look
100.0%
at
99.9%
creative
85.3%
jobs.
98.9%
This
99.8%
new
100.0%
wave
99.9%
of
100.0%
AI
99.9%
is
100.0%
generative
100.0%
after
99.1%
all,
94.7%
producing
87.9%
writing
100.0%
and
99.5%
artwork,
99.6%
uh,
77.1%
at
99.3%
the
93.4%
click
100.0%
of
99.9%
a
99.9%
button.
100.0%
A
99.9%
lot
100.0%
of
99.8%
the
99.6%
conversation
99.9%
around
99.7%
AI
92.6%
currently
100.0%
revolves
98.1%
around
100.0%
AI
99.9%
and
99.1%
art.
100.0%
But
100.0%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
of
99.6%
the
99.4%
time
99.8%
this
99.6%
has
99.2%
been
100.0%
around
100.0%
stolen
85.1%
art.
99.7%
Like
99.4%
we
100.0%
talked
99.9%
about
99.8%
earlier,
99.8%
AI
100.0%
relies
100.0%
on
100.0%
machine
100.0%
learning.
98.1%
Machine
100.0%
learning
100.0%
relies
100.0%
on
100.0%
a
99.8%
whole
99.8%
lot
99.9%
of
100.0%
data.
99.9%
So
99.2%
any
99.9%
art
100.0%
related
99.9%
AI
100.0%
needs
99.9%
a
100.0%
massive
100.0%
art
99.9%
database
100.0%
to
100.0%
train
100.0%
on.
99.9%
And
99.2%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
that
98.7%
art
99.9%
is
99.9%
scraped
99.9%
from
99.7%
the
99.9%
Internet
100.0%
without
100.0%
compensation
100.0%
or
99.8%
even
98.5%
acknowledgements.
86.2%
For
100.0%
example,
79.4%
Getty
99.9%
Images
99.9%
is
99.6%
suing
79.5%
Stability
100.0%
AI
99.0%
for
100.0%
using
100.0%
its
99.9%
massive
100.0%
image
100.0%
archive
91.0%
as,
100.0%
uh,
73.3%
data
100.0%
for
100.0%
machine
100.0%
learning.
99.8%
Considering
100.0%
that
89.8%
stability
99.9%
keeps
100.0%
generating
100.0%
images
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
98.8%
Getty
99.9%
Images
99.8%
watermark
99.9%
logo,
99.9%
I
99.6%
think
100.0%
they
99.9%
have
99.9%
a
99.9%
pretty
100.0%
solid
100.0%
case.
100.0%
And
99.0%
then
99.3%
there's
99.7%
Sudowrite,
97.5%
which
99.7%
appears
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
knowledge
99.9%
of
99.8%
the
100.0%
Omegaverse,
99.3%
which
99.9%
strongly
100.0%
implies
100.0%
that
98.7%
it's
87.2%
scraped
95.3%
a
99.9%
significant
100.0%
amount
100.0%
of
100.0%
data
100.0%
from
100.0%
the
99.3%
fanfiction
97.6%
website
99.9%
AO3.
99.8%
Basically,
91.7%
AI
90.4%
needs
100.0%
human
100.0%
created
99.9%
stuff
86.8%
to
99.9%
learn
100.0%
to
99.7%
make
100.0%
its
99.3%
own
100.0%
stuff.
100.0%
But
99.9%
artists
100.0%
aren't
100.0%
just
100.0%
concerned
100.0%
about
100.0%
AI
99.9%
using
100.0%
their
100.0%
work.
99.0%
They're
94.1%
worried
99.9%
about
100.0%
AI
100.0%
replacing
99.9%
their
99.9%
work.
97.8%
AI
99.5%
is
99.9%
actually
99.8%
one
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
issues
100.0%
behind
100.0%
the
99.9%
US
97.5%
Writers
95.3%
strike,
100.0%
which,
99.8%
as
99.9%
of
100.0%
this
99.6%
recording,
99.9%
is
99.9%
still
99.9%
ongoing.
77.0%
Hi,
98.2%
I'm
99.7%
Francesca
99.9%
Ramsey.
95.0%
I'm
99.8%
an
100.0%
actress,
100.0%
TV
89.3%
writer,
100.0%
and
99.3%
producer,
100.0%
and
99.9%
member
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
Writers
91.7%
Guild
100.0%
of
99.9%
America.
100.0%
But
99.6%
folks
100.0%
online
100.0%
might
99.9%
remember
100.0%
me
100.0%
as
100.0%
the
99.8%
host
100.0%
and
99.6%
exec
96.0%
producer
100.0%
of
99.8%
MTV's
98.5%
Decoded.
98.1%
It
99.3%
quickly
100.0%
became
100.0%
apparent
100.0%
that
99.8%
for
99.9%
this
100.0%
video,
100.0%
I
100.0%
was
100.0%
going
62.2%
to
99.9%
have
99.9%
to
99.9%
talk
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
99.9%
bunch
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
in
99.9%
different
100.0%
industries
100.0%
to
100.0%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
AI
99.7%
was
99.9%
impacting
100.0%
them.
99.2%
When
99.9%
it
100.0%
comes
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
99.9%
potential
100.0%
of
99.8%
AI
99.9%
being
100.0%
used
100.0%
in
99.9%
TV
83.9%
writing,
100.0%
the
99.9%
thing
100.0%
that
99.9%
I'm
86.2%
most
100.0%
worried
100.0%
about
100.0%
is
100.0%
the
100.0%
studio
100.0%
potentially
100.0%
using
100.0%
AI
97.4%
to
99.7%
cut
100.0%
us
100.0%
out
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
writing
100.0%
process
100.0%
and
97.1%
thus
99.9%
pay
99.9%
us
99.9%
less.
100.0%
So
98.2%
there
100.0%
is
100.0%
a
100.0%
world
100.0%
in
100.0%
which
100.0%
the
99.5%
studios
98.1%
could
99.7%
use
100.0%
AI
99.2%
to
100.0%
create
100.0%
a
100.0%
first
100.0%
draft,
78.7%
either
100.0%
off
100.0%
of
99.9%
existing
84.4%
IP
97.5%
or
99.9%
interpreting
98.7%
another
100.0%
script
100.0%
that's
99.9%
already
100.0%
written
100.0%
or
100.0%
just
100.0%
with
99.9%
different
100.0%
metrics
100.0%
that
100.0%
have
98.0%
been
100.0%
plugged
100.0%
in,
100.0%
and
99.4%
then
100.0%
it
100.0%
could
99.9%
pop
100.0%
out
99.9%
a
64.4%
first
99.9%
draft,
93.6%
and
98.6%
a
99.9%
writer
100.0%
would
99.9%
then
99.9%
be
100.0%
tasked
99.7%
with
100.0%
rewriting
100.0%
it.
99.7%
Rewriting
99.9%
typically
99.7%
requires
99.9%
a
98.9%
much
100.0%
smaller
100.0%
writing
100.0%
team
99.9%
than
99.7%
creating
81.8%
an
95.4%
original
100.0%
script.
100.0%
So
99.3%
by
99.9%
using
100.0%
AI
98.6%
to
90.1%
create
99.8%
an
99.8%
initial
100.0%
draft,
99.9%
the
100.0%
amount,
99.9%
um,
70.6%
of
100.0%
viable
99.1%
writing
100.0%
jobs
100.0%
dramatically
100.0%
decreases.
100.0%
The
99.8%
WGA
93.8%
brought
98.8%
up
100.0%
concerns
100.0%
about
100.0%
AI
99.8%
with
99.9%
studios,
100.0%
and
99.5%
to
99.7%
the
100.0%
shock
100.0%
of
99.9%
nobody,
100.0%
they
99.8%
refused
78.1%
to
99.9%
even
99.9%
address
100.0%
AI
77.9%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
potential
100.0%
issue.
99.8%
So
97.0%
the
100.0%
Writers
96.4%
Guild
100.0%
of
99.9%
America
100.0%
has
99.9%
a
100.0%
contract
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
99.7%
amptp,
86.3%
which
100.0%
is
100.0%
the
100.0%
alliance
100.0%
of
100.0%
motion
100.0%
picture
99.9%
and
99.9%
television
99.7%
producers,
96.3%
and
99.1%
that
100.0%
covers
100.0%
about
100.0%
350
100.0%
different
100.0%
production
100.0%
companies
100.0%
and
75.5%
networks,
100.0%
including
100.0%
streaming
96.2%
networks.
99.8%
Unfortunately,
89.7%
they
100.0%
refuse
81.9%
to
100.0%
engage
100.0%
at
100.0%
all
99.9%
on
96.2%
any
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
topics
99.9%
surrounding
83.7%
AI.
99.7%
So
92.4%
we
99.6%
asked
100.0%
about
100.0%
making
100.0%
sure
100.0%
that
99.7%
AI
98.8%
could
100.0%
not
100.0%
be
99.9%
used
100.0%
to
100.0%
write
99.9%
scripts,
99.7%
could
100.0%
not
100.0%
be
100.0%
trained
100.0%
using
100.0%
our
99.9%
intellectual
100.0%
property,
100.0%
and
99.4%
could
100.0%
not
100.0%
be
100.0%
folded
99.8%
into
99.9%
the
99.8%
minimum
100.0%
basic
100.0%
agreements,
99.3%
meaning
99.9%
that
98.4%
you
99.9%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
follow
100.0%
the
99.9%
agreements
99.9%
that
99.5%
we
100.0%
have
100.0%
for
100.0%
writers
100.0%
getting
100.0%
paid
100.0%
per
100.0%
draft
83.9%
and
99.6%
per
100.0%
week,
100.0%
and
98.9%
that
99.2%
AI
99.1%
cannot
99.9%
be
99.9%
used
100.0%
to
100.0%
get
99.9%
around
100.0%
those
99.8%
standards.
99.9%
This
99.8%
isn't
99.9%
some
99.9%
paranoid
90.5%
addition
99.3%
to
99.9%
negotiations.
99.4%
AI
99.6%
is
99.9%
already
100.0%
affecting
92.5%
artists,
99.9%
getting
99.9%
jobs,
100.0%
or
99.9%
even
99.9%
replacing
96.4%
them
99.9%
altogether,
97.0%
which
99.9%
I
100.0%
learned
100.0%
about
99.6%
in
99.0%
more
99.9%
detail
100.0%
when
100.0%
I
100.0%
interviewed
91.8%
Eddie,
91.8%
who
100.0%
had
99.9%
his
99.8%
own
100.0%
negative
100.0%
experiences
99.8%
with
99.7%
the
99.9%
use
100.0%
of
100.0%
AI
99.8%
in
99.4%
his
99.9%
work.
99.7%
I
99.7%
met
100.0%
someone
99.9%
who
100.0%
just
99.9%
wanted
100.0%
me
100.0%
to
100.0%
record
100.0%
as
99.9%
a
100.0%
character
98.9%
in
99.9%
his
100.0%
animated
100.0%
show.
100.0%
And
97.6%
that's
100.0%
fine.
100.0%
We've
96.8%
known
100.0%
each
100.0%
other
100.0%
for
100.0%
a
100.0%
long
100.0%
time
100.0%
in
99.8%
online
99.9%
spaces,
100.0%
and
79.8%
I
99.7%
was
99.4%
happy
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
so.
100.0%
There
99.9%
was
100.0%
no
100.0%
money
100.0%
involved.
99.8%
It
99.7%
was
100.0%
just,
99.4%
yeah,
97.9%
sure,
100.0%
I'm
100.0%
happy
100.0%
to
99.7%
do
94.7%
a
99.4%
voice.
99.1%
And
99.4%
then
99.9%
the
99.9%
character
96.4%
would
99.9%
recur.
99.5%
He
98.0%
would
90.0%
come
100.0%
back
99.9%
not
98.9%
every
100.0%
week,
100.0%
every
99.9%
month,
99.8%
you
84.1%
know,
99.3%
be
94.4%
every
99.9%
other,
99.9%
uh,
68.9%
one
99.8%
kind
99.9%
of
99.8%
thing.
99.9%
It
99.7%
was
100.0%
never
100.0%
an
93.0%
inconvenience.
99.8%
Then
98.2%
out
100.0%
the
99.2%
blue,
99.7%
he
99.7%
sent
100.0%
me
100.0%
a
100.0%
message
100.0%
saying,
99.6%
I'm
97.1%
experimenting
99.2%
using
100.0%
AI
77.7%
voices.
99.6%
And
99.0%
how
100.0%
would
70.5%
I
100.0%
feel
100.0%
about
100.0%
allowing
79.6%
my
100.0%
voice
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
manipulated
100.0%
into
100.0%
an
100.0%
AI
87.6%
voice?
100.0%
I
86.5%
was
97.2%
like,
99.5%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
honest,
100.0%
not
99.3%
really.
100.0%
I
95.2%
don't.
99.5%
I
98.1%
don't
100.0%
feel
100.0%
very
99.9%
comfortable
99.9%
with
99.9%
that.
99.8%
Uh,
98.7%
I've
100.0%
had
100.0%
experiences
100.0%
where
99.8%
people
100.0%
have
99.8%
taken
100.0%
advantage
100.0%
of
99.9%
my
100.0%
voice,
100.0%
and
65.1%
so
100.0%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
want
95.8%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
that
100.0%
again.
99.8%
So,
97.7%
no,
99.1%
thank
100.0%
you.
99.5%
I
97.7%
mean,
100.0%
this
99.9%
seems
97.6%
like
99.9%
a
99.9%
really
99.6%
very
99.5%
reasonable
100.0%
request,
97.8%
especially
100.0%
considering
100.0%
it
100.0%
was
100.0%
an
100.0%
unpaid
100.0%
gig.
100.0%
But
99.9%
the
100.0%
creator
99.8%
of
100.0%
this
99.8%
animated
96.4%
show
100.0%
didn't
100.0%
react
100.0%
well.
98.7%
He
99.1%
got
100.0%
very
100.0%
offended,
99.4%
um,
97.9%
saying,
80.2%
I
99.8%
can't
99.9%
believe
100.0%
you
99.9%
would
99.6%
think
100.0%
that
98.1%
I
73.1%
would.
99.5%
I
98.1%
would
100.0%
abuse
89.3%
your
99.9%
voice
100.0%
like
99.8%
that.
99.3%
In
99.8%
the
100.0%
end,
100.0%
he
99.9%
decided,
99.4%
uh,
96.3%
since
100.0%
you
100.0%
won't
99.9%
let
100.0%
me
100.0%
use
100.0%
your
100.0%
voice,
100.0%
I'm
98.1%
going
100.0%
to
100.0%
have
100.0%
an
99.7%
AI
98.3%
generate
99.9%
a
99.9%
different
100.0%
voice
100.0%
for
100.0%
your
100.0%
character
93.9%
instead.
98.5%
So
99.6%
I
100.0%
got
100.0%
fired
100.0%
for
99.9%
a
99.9%
character
90.2%
I
100.0%
never
100.0%
got
100.0%
paid
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
anyway.
99.9%
And
73.0%
my
100.0%
choice
100.0%
was
99.1%
either
99.6%
it
48.6%
had
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
an
99.3%
AI
98.6%
of
99.7%
my
100.0%
own
99.8%
voice
100.0%
or
99.8%
an
98.9%
AI
97.4%
of
90.6%
someone
83.7%
else's.
94.3%
It
81.4%
doesn't
99.6%
feel
100.0%
like
100.0%
the
100.0%
increasing
99.8%
use
100.0%
of
100.0%
AI
99.8%
in
95.2%
business
100.0%
is
99.9%
about
100.0%
money,
100.0%
at
99.9%
least
100.0%
not
100.0%
strictly.
99.6%
After
100.0%
all,
100.0%
the
100.0%
WGA
88.1%
strikes,
100.0%
partly
100.0%
fueled
85.0%
by
100.0%
AI
99.8%
concerns,
100.0%
is
81.5%
costing
99.9%
the
99.7%
studios
99.7%
way
100.0%
more
100.0%
money
100.0%
than
100.0%
it
100.0%
would
100.0%
to
100.0%
meet
100.0%
their
99.9%
paid
76.4%
demands.
99.9%
AI
99.4%
isn't
100.0%
always
100.0%
just
100.0%
about
100.0%
money.
99.8%
It's
99.8%
sometimes
99.9%
about
100.0%
control.
99.8%
It's
99.8%
been
81.7%
used
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
more
100.0%
insidious,
100.0%
opportunistic
100.0%
way
100.0%
where
99.9%
people
100.0%
will
99.9%
take
99.9%
people's
99.9%
voices
100.0%
and
81.7%
fake
78.7%
endorsements.
96.9%
I've
99.8%
had
100.0%
a
99.9%
YouTube
92.2%
channel,
99.9%
um,
99.5%
with
99.1%
their
100.0%
own
100.0%
animated
100.0%
series.
100.0%
And
99.1%
then
99.7%
they
100.0%
took
100.0%
my
100.0%
voice
100.0%
without
99.9%
my
100.0%
permission,
100.0%
using
98.6%
this
99.9%
Uber
95.0%
Duck
86.3%
site,
98.8%
um,
99.9%
and,
94.0%
uh,
88.4%
fake
98.9%
an
97.7%
endorsement
94.8%
from
100.0%
me.
99.9%
They
98.7%
would
95.8%
make
100.0%
their
100.0%
own
100.0%
video
100.0%
essay
100.0%
with
99.3%
me
99.9%
with
99.9%
my
100.0%
voice
100.0%
and
90.2%
talking
99.6%
about
100.0%
this
100.0%
animated
100.0%
show
100.0%
that
99.9%
I
99.9%
have
99.1%
never
100.0%
heard
100.0%
of,
99.6%
and,
98.6%
um,
99.1%
just
99.2%
pretend
96.8%
that
98.9%
this
99.9%
is
99.9%
actually
99.9%
me.
99.8%
And
85.6%
AI
98.9%
isn't
99.9%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
time
100.0%
that
99.3%
corporations
91.0%
have
99.9%
exploited
91.4%
an
99.9%
actor's
99.8%
voice
100.0%
or
99.9%
image
100.0%
to
100.0%
endorse
100.0%
a
99.9%
product.
99.7%
Lindsay
87.7%
Ellis
99.5%
made
61.0%
made
58.2%
a
100.0%
really
99.8%
great
100.0%
video
100.0%
about
100.0%
Robin
99.7%
Williams's
91.3%
experiences
99.8%
with
98.4%
the
99.9%
Walt
99.8%
Disney
100.0%
Corporation
98.9%
during
100.0%
the
100.0%
marketing
100.0%
of
99.9%
Aladdin.
99.9%
Williams,
99.2%
mindful
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
ethics
100.0%
of
100.0%
advertising
100.0%
to
99.9%
children,
100.0%
was
100.0%
very
100.0%
strict
100.0%
about
100.0%
his
99.9%
voice
100.0%
not
100.0%
being
100.0%
used
100.0%
for
100.0%
endorsements.
90.0%
And
98.9%
Eddie
87.8%
actually
99.9%
brought
99.5%
up
99.7%
this
100.0%
very
99.7%
example
100.0%
to
99.9%
me
100.0%
while
100.0%
we
100.0%
were
100.0%
talking
89.8%
unprompted,
94.0%
he
99.9%
saw
100.0%
what
100.0%
was
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
fucking
93.0%
horizon.
99.3%
And
99.1%
the
99.9%
fact
100.0%
that
99.7%
he
100.0%
had,
99.8%
like,
79.8%
like,
99.1%
contractually
99.9%
claused
97.4%
that
99.9%
no
100.0%
one
99.9%
can
100.0%
use
100.0%
his
100.0%
image,
100.0%
his
99.9%
likeness,
100.0%
his
100.0%
voice
99.9%
in
96.2%
anything
99.8%
was
92.3%
so
100.0%
ahead
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
time.
100.0%
What
100.0%
was
100.0%
to
99.9%
stop
100.0%
Disney
99.9%
just
97.5%
putting
90.8%
Robin
99.7%
Williams
100.0%
in
100.0%
that
100.0%
live
100.0%
action
100.0%
Disney
90.8%
movie
99.6%
with
100.0%
his
100.0%
voice
100.0%
and
89.3%
his
100.0%
CGI
86.2%
face
99.9%
on
99.9%
top,
100.0%
you
93.1%
know,
99.9%
like,
93.8%
uh,
97.4%
yeah,
98.3%
I
99.8%
think
99.9%
we're
99.9%
going
57.5%
to
99.5%
see
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
actors
96.0%
starting
83.6%
to
100.0%
protect
100.0%
their
100.0%
identities,
100.0%
if
70.6%
they
100.0%
haven't
99.9%
already.
100.0%
So
98.6%
this
100.0%
is
99.9%
an
100.0%
example
91.9%
of
100.0%
AI
97.4%
amplifying
94.9%
existing
100.0%
issues.
98.2%
Technology
100.0%
very
99.9%
rarely
100.0%
creates
100.0%
new
100.0%
problems,
100.0%
but
100.0%
it
99.8%
can
100.0%
make
100.0%
old
99.9%
ones
99.9%
worse.
99.2%
Beyond
92.5%
the
100.0%
horror
100.0%
of
100.0%
AI
99.9%
taking
100.0%
away
100.0%
the
100.0%
power
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
artists,
78.7%
there's
98.9%
also
100.0%
a
99.9%
negative
100.0%
impact
100.0%
on
99.9%
the
99.9%
art
99.8%
itself.
99.9%
Art,
87.9%
uh,
93.3%
essentially
99.9%
is
99.7%
a
100.0%
form
100.0%
of
100.0%
communication
100.0%
between
100.0%
creator
99.7%
and
99.9%
audience.
99.4%
When
99.9%
we
94.5%
remove
100.0%
the
100.0%
creator,
100.0%
that
99.9%
changes
100.0%
how
100.0%
the
100.0%
audience
97.3%
is
99.9%
going
99.9%
to
100.0%
react
99.9%
to
99.8%
the
99.9%
art.
99.8%
I
99.9%
can't
100.0%
help
100.0%
but
100.0%
feel
100.0%
like,
99.1%
particularly
99.6%
with
99.2%
voice
100.0%
acting,
100.0%
it's
83.5%
probably
93.8%
going
76.6%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
100.0%
matter
100.0%
of
100.0%
time
100.0%
before
100.0%
we're
99.7%
going
96.2%
to
99.9%
see
100.0%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
more
99.9%
AI
99.6%
voices
99.8%
taking
91.4%
the
99.8%
place
100.0%
of
99.8%
voice
100.0%
actors.
100.0%
And
65.1%
it
99.8%
will
99.9%
lack
98.5%
soul.
91.7%
I
98.2%
think
100.0%
this
99.3%
is
99.9%
a
99.9%
common
100.0%
critique
100.0%
of
100.0%
AI
99.3%
art.
92.4%
It's
99.8%
soulless.
89.6%
But
99.4%
what
99.9%
does
100.0%
that
99.8%
actually
98.8%
mean?
100.0%
And
99.4%
if
73.1%
AI
97.2%
art
96.8%
is
100.0%
inherently
85.4%
soulless,
91.7%
does
99.9%
that
99.4%
mean
100.0%
it's
98.5%
bad?
100.0%
Because
99.4%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
enjoy
100.0%
AI
99.7%
art.
98.2%
They
99.8%
pay
99.9%
their
99.5%
£2.99
97.5%
for
100.0%
some
99.7%
lens
88.8%
at
33.4%
AI
95.4%
portraits
91.8%
and
99.3%
it
99.5%
makes
100.0%
them
100.0%
laugh,
88.3%
it
99.3%
provokes
100.0%
an
99.9%
emotional
97.8%
reaction.
99.1%
And
98.3%
isn't
100.0%
that
99.8%
what
99.8%
art
99.9%
is
99.8%
supposed
100.0%
to
100.0%
do?
100.0%
I'm
99.9%
not
100.0%
sure
100.0%
if
99.7%
can
99.7%
AI
98.9%
make
99.9%
good
100.0%
art
100.0%
is
99.4%
the
100.0%
most
100.0%
important
100.0%
question
100.0%
here
99.5%
because
99.9%
it's
95.0%
going
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
99.9%
inherently
90.2%
subjective.
100.0%
I
99.9%
feel
100.0%
like
99.7%
the
100.0%
real
100.0%
questions
99.6%
are
99.6%
things
99.6%
like,
73.1%
will
99.8%
the
99.5%
unregulated
96.3%
use
99.8%
of
100.0%
AI
99.9%
prevent
100.0%
good
100.0%
art
100.0%
from
99.8%
being
100.0%
made?
100.0%
And
98.4%
does
100.0%
a
99.4%
society
100.0%
that
99.9%
devalues
99.9%
artists
99.9%
financially
100.0%
and
99.7%
legally
100.0%
prevent
100.0%
good
99.9%
art
100.0%
from
99.8%
being
100.0%
made?
99.9%
One
99.2%
of
100.0%
Francesca's
99.5%
large,
94.6%
largest
76.6%
concerns
99.4%
about
100.0%
AI
99.5%
is
99.9%
how,
100.0%
if
99.8%
unregulated,
99.5%
it
99.8%
could
99.6%
prevent
99.9%
basically
99.9%
anyone
100.0%
who
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
a
79.6%
Nepo
99.0%
baby
99.5%
or
99.9%
already
100.0%
wealthy
100.0%
from
100.0%
becoming
100.0%
a
100.0%
writer.
99.9%
Oftentimes
96.9%
marginalized
100.0%
folks
99.3%
do
100.0%
not
100.0%
have
100.0%
family
100.0%
connections
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
business
100.0%
already,
100.0%
or
99.9%
don't
100.0%
just
100.0%
have
100.0%
the
99.8%
wealth
99.8%
to
100.0%
stay
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
industry
100.0%
and
67.9%
sustain
100.0%
themselves
100.0%
between
100.0%
jobs,
99.9%
which
100.0%
are
100.0%
some
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
issues
100.0%
that
99.9%
we're
96.2%
fighting
100.0%
for
99.8%
in
100.0%
our
100.0%
contract
99.9%
with
100.0%
the
100.0%
studio.
100.0%
If
99.7%
AI
99.6%
is
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
write
100.0%
first
100.0%
drafts
99.9%
of
100.0%
scripts,
95.1%
it's
99.9%
going
100.0%
to
100.0%
require
100.0%
a
100.0%
higher
100.0%
level
100.0%
writer
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
a
100.0%
polish
100.0%
or
99.9%
a
98.7%
rewrite
100.0%
on
99.9%
those
99.4%
drafts.
89.7%
And
95.5%
so
99.9%
once
99.8%
again,
100.0%
newer
99.7%
writers
99.9%
are
100.0%
not
99.9%
probably
99.9%
going
96.4%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
getting
100.0%
those
100.0%
opportunities
100.0%
because
100.0%
they
100.0%
won't
90.0%
have
100.0%
the
100.0%
skills
93.6%
needed
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
that
100.0%
kind
99.3%
of
100.0%
rewriting.
93.2%
And
96.2%
those
100.0%
are
100.0%
things
100.0%
that
99.8%
you
99.9%
learn
99.8%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
writer's
91.8%
room.
100.0%
And
96.2%
once
100.0%
again,
100.0%
I'm
99.5%
worried
100.0%
that
99.5%
AI
75.4%
will
100.0%
shorten
100.0%
the
100.0%
length
100.0%
of
100.0%
writers
94.8%
rooms
99.9%
again
98.9%
because
99.9%
it
99.4%
will
97.9%
be
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
crank
100.0%
out
99.9%
first
99.9%
drafts
93.4%
in
99.9%
no
100.0%
time
100.0%
and
98.8%
will
94.1%
also
100.0%
potentially
100.0%
make
100.0%
the
100.0%
writing
99.9%
staff
99.5%
smaller.
100.0%
And
94.3%
again,
99.8%
the
100.0%
people
100.0%
who
100.0%
will
99.8%
then
99.7%
be
100.0%
most
100.0%
impacted
100.0%
by
100.0%
that
99.9%
are
99.2%
newer
100.0%
writers.
99.8%
And
97.6%
again,
99.5%
that
98.5%
ends
99.8%
up
99.9%
oftentimes
96.6%
being
98.6%
marginalized
90.2%
folks
100.0%
that
99.4%
need
100.0%
those
99.9%
opportunities
100.0%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
their
100.0%
foot
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
door.
99.9%
So
93.9%
AI
96.0%
has
99.9%
the
99.4%
potential
100.0%
to
100.0%
prevent
100.0%
artists
100.0%
from
99.8%
building
100.0%
their
99.8%
careers,
99.5%
destroying
100.0%
art
100.0%
before
100.0%
it's
99.2%
even
99.6%
made.
99.7%
Writing,
96.2%
painting,
100.0%
playing
99.9%
music,
100.0%
drawing
84.5%
art
99.8%
is
98.5%
something
100.0%
that
97.9%
human
100.0%
beings
100.0%
do
100.0%
to
99.9%
relax,
78.1%
to
99.4%
express
100.0%
themselves,
100.0%
to
99.5%
bring
99.9%
joy
100.0%
and
99.8%
catharsis
100.0%
to
99.9%
themselves
100.0%
and
75.5%
others.
100.0%
The
99.7%
fact
100.0%
so
99.8%
many
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
99.9%
working
100.0%
so
99.8%
hard
100.0%
to
100.0%
ensure
99.8%
that
98.9%
machines
100.0%
that
99.7%
feel
98.7%
none
100.0%
of
99.9%
these
98.7%
things
99.8%
can
99.9%
replace
100.0%
humans
100.0%
in
99.9%
that
99.4%
process,
100.0%
and
32.9%
feels
100.0%
instinctively
89.8%
soulless
93.7%
to
99.6%
me.
100.0%
So
98.6%
yeah,
98.3%
AI
83.1%
and
99.8%
creativity
100.0%
is
97.2%
a
100.0%
sticky
99.8%
subject,
100.0%
but
99.9%
what
99.9%
about
100.0%
more
100.0%
analytical
93.8%
jobs?
99.6%
The
92.4%
journalist
97.8%
we
99.9%
saw
100.0%
at
99.6%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
of
99.7%
the
99.3%
video
100.0%
some
100.0%
of
99.5%
the
99.8%
recent
100.0%
instances
100.0%
of
100.0%
newsrooms
97.0%
being
99.9%
downsized,
99.1%
even
99.9%
cut
99.6%
altogether,
99.2%
as
100.0%
the
70.5%
role
99.5%
of
100.0%
journalists
98.7%
comes
99.4%
up
100.0%
against
100.0%
developments
99.7%
in
99.9%
AI.
99.3%
The
99.7%
word
99.6%
journalism
100.0%
is
99.9%
so
99.8%
far
100.0%
reaching,
100.0%
right?
79.1%
You've
99.8%
got
99.9%
your
99.7%
really
99.4%
high
100.0%
end
100.0%
Pulitzer
99.9%
Prize
95.2%
winning
100.0%
investigative
76.5%
stuff,
99.8%
but
99.7%
you've
99.7%
also
100.0%
got
99.9%
your
98.5%
listicles,
99.7%
top
97.7%
10
100.0%
moments
100.0%
of
99.9%
breakfast
100.0%
TV
77.2%
in
99.0%
2023,
100.0%
that
100.0%
kind
99.7%
of
99.4%
thing
100.0%
that
99.9%
happens.
99.6%
There's
73.7%
roundups
98.1%
and
99.8%
things
99.9%
like
99.9%
that.
99.4%
That's
92.6%
Shivani
92.6%
Dave,
81.5%
a
100.0%
journalist,
100.0%
broadcaster
100.0%
and
100.0%
physicist
100.0%
talking
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.9%
wide
100.0%
spectrum
100.0%
of
100.0%
what
100.0%
we
99.9%
might
99.9%
consider
99.9%
journalism.
91.7%
We've
99.9%
seen
100.0%
a
99.9%
kind
99.5%
of
99.7%
well
98.5%
about
99.6%
time
100.0%
response
100.0%
by
99.9%
some
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
99.9%
news
98.7%
of
97.8%
BuzzFeed
97.5%
News
99.4%
closing
98.5%
down
100.0%
based
100.0%
on
99.9%
this
99.7%
idea
100.0%
that
99.9%
the
99.8%
site
99.8%
wasn't
100.0%
real
100.0%
journalism,
99.9%
presumably
100.0%
mistaking
100.0%
it
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
97.6%
light
100.0%
hearted
99.0%
buzzfeed
100.0%
content
100.0%
that
99.2%
focused
89.2%
more
99.9%
on
99.5%
like
67.9%
quizzes.
99.7%
And
99.2%
Indeed,
99.9%
alongside
100.0%
closing
99.9%
BuzzFeed
99.1%
News
99.6%
founder
100.0%
Jonah
98.9%
Peretti
91.4%
said
99.5%
there
99.6%
would
63.4%
be
99.9%
substantial
100.0%
job
100.0%
cuts
100.0%
across
100.0%
the
100.0%
rest
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.7%
business,
100.0%
totalling
87.7%
about
99.0%
180
90.9%
redundancies
100.0%
representing
76.5%
about
99.6%
15%
99.1%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
company's
99.9%
workforce.
100.0%
But
99.4%
BuzzFeed
100.0%
News
99.9%
itself
99.9%
was
99.9%
a
99.9%
genuine
90.6%
news
100.0%
outlet.
99.0%
It
99.9%
won
100.0%
the
99.9%
George
99.5%
Polk
98.9%
Award,
99.7%
the
99.8%
Sydney
96.1%
Award,
98.3%
the
99.8%
National
100.0%
Magazine
100.0%
Award,
99.3%
the
99.8%
National
99.9%
Press
100.0%
Foundation
100.0%
Award
97.8%
and
99.9%
the
99.9%
Pulitzer
99.9%
Prize
99.9%
for
99.8%
International
99.9%
Reporting,
86.5%
and
99.7%
was
99.9%
a
100.0%
member
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
White
100.0%
House
99.9%
Press
98.2%
Core.
51.4%
So
97.3%
what
100.0%
does
99.8%
the
99.4%
destabilization
90.1%
of
99.9%
newsrooms
95.6%
mean
99.8%
when
99.2%
it
99.9%
comes
100.0%
to
100.0%
AI?
99.9%
The
99.9%
first
100.0%
thing
99.9%
to
99.9%
know
82.6%
is
99.9%
that
99.6%
AI
99.9%
has
99.8%
already
100.0%
been
100.0%
used
100.0%
in
100.0%
journalism
100.0%
for
100.0%
years
100.0%
now.
99.3%
According
100.0%
to
99.4%
author
99.8%
of
99.2%
Newsmakers
92.0%
Artificial
97.7%
Intelligence
93.0%
and
99.5%
the
99.8%
Future
100.0%
of
100.0%
Journalism,
99.7%
AI
99.8%
innovation
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
past
99.8%
decade
100.0%
has
99.9%
come
100.0%
in
100.0%
three
99.9%
automation,
100.0%
augmentation
99.0%
and
99.5%
generation.
99.9%
During
100.0%
the
99.9%
automation
100.0%
phase,
100.0%
the
99.9%
focus
100.0%
was
99.9%
on
99.9%
automating
99.9%
data
100.0%
driven
94.7%
news
99.4%
stories
99.4%
such
100.0%
as
99.6%
financial
100.0%
reports,
99.8%
sports
99.9%
results
99.9%
and
53.1%
economic
100.0%
indicators
99.7%
using
100.0%
natural
100.0%
language
100.0%
generation
100.0%
techniques.
100.0%
Essentially
98.5%
the
100.0%
idea
100.0%
here
100.0%
was
100.0%
to
100.0%
free
100.0%
up
100.0%
journalists
96.8%
time
100.0%
by
99.9%
taking
100.0%
away
99.9%
more
99.5%
mundane
100.0%
or
99.5%
repetitive
100.0%
tasks
99.9%
that
100.0%
didn't
99.9%
need
100.0%
complex
92.3%
human
100.0%
analysis
89.3%
or
99.9%
judgment.
74.5%
Then
99.9%
the
99.9%
emphasis
99.6%
shifted
100.0%
to
100.0%
augmenting
100.0%
reporting
100.0%
through
99.7%
machine
100.0%
learning
99.9%
and
99.2%
natural
99.5%
language
100.0%
processing
76.5%
to
99.9%
analyze
86.0%
large
100.0%
data
100.0%
sets
89.4%
and
99.9%
uncover
100.0%
trends.
100.0%
This
100.0%
helped
99.9%
inform
100.0%
the
99.9%
reporting
100.0%
itself
100.0%
as
100.0%
well
100.0%
as
100.0%
what
100.0%
was
100.0%
reported
100.0%
to
100.0%
begin
100.0%
with.
99.2%
Using
100.0%
data
100.0%
to
100.0%
support
100.0%
journalists
97.7%
work
99.9%
as
99.8%
reporter
99.8%
Barbara
98.4%
Gruber
94.4%
explained,
90.3%
tools
99.9%
like
99.9%
Heliograph,
94.9%
News
99.9%
Tracer
95.0%
or
99.5%
CrowdTangle
93.4%
are
98.9%
now
99.8%
alerting
99.9%
journalists
100.0%
to
100.0%
breaking
100.0%
news,
100.0%
viral
100.0%
stories,
100.0%
and
89.3%
anomalous
90.6%
data
100.0%
trends.
99.9%
Editors
100.0%
can
99.7%
then
99.6%
determine
100.0%
if
100.0%
there's
98.9%
a
100.0%
bigger
99.9%
story
100.0%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
written
100.0%
by
100.0%
a
99.8%
human
100.0%
being.
99.9%
But
99.4%
then
99.9%
we
99.9%
get
99.9%
to
99.7%
where
100.0%
we
99.9%
are
99.8%
now.
70.6%
The
99.7%
use
100.0%
of
100.0%
generative
100.0%
AI
100.0%
using
100.0%
large
100.0%
language
100.0%
models
81.1%
to
100.0%
generate
100.0%
narrative
99.8%
text
100.0%
at
99.9%
scale.
100.0%
While
100.0%
the
99.9%
first
100.0%
two
99.2%
waves
99.6%
were
98.4%
very
99.8%
much
100.0%
supplementary,
99.8%
this
99.6%
third
100.0%
iteration
100.0%
is
99.9%
potentially
100.0%
utterly
90.6%
transformative
99.3%
for
99.9%
journalism.
99.1%
You
99.9%
can
57.7%
ask
100.0%
a
99.6%
chatbot
98.3%
to
100.0%
write
100.0%
an
99.9%
entire
100.0%
article,
100.0%
even
100.0%
specifying
90.2%
a
100.0%
particular
100.0%
viewpoint
100.0%
or
99.8%
publication
100.0%
style.
99.8%
In
99.7%
this
100.0%
way,
100.0%
we
99.9%
can
99.5%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
AI
94.9%
could
97.9%
be
100.0%
a
100.0%
major
100.0%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
all
99.9%
areas
100.0%
of
100.0%
publication.
99.8%
It
99.9%
could
93.6%
be
99.8%
used
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
research
100.0%
phase
99.8%
to
99.9%
transcribe
88.4%
interviews
100.0%
of
99.7%
sources,
61.5%
summarize
77.4%
documents,
100.0%
or
100.0%
track
100.0%
trending
100.0%
topics.
100.0%
Then
99.6%
it
99.5%
could
67.8%
be
99.4%
used
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
article
100.0%
writing
100.0%
stage
99.9%
itself,
99.8%
with
99.9%
generative
100.0%
AI
96.6%
capable
100.0%
of
100.0%
generating
100.0%
entire
100.0%
articles
100.0%
from
100.0%
scratch
99.9%
in
99.9%
seconds.
100.0%
And
97.4%
finally,
100.0%
it
99.9%
could
90.9%
be
99.9%
used
100.0%
to
99.9%
distribute
100.0%
these
99.4%
pieces,
98.9%
including
99.9%
automated
100.0%
tagging
99.9%
systems,
99.9%
scheduling,
100.0%
and
99.9%
creating
89.9%
social
100.0%
cuts
83.9%
of
99.9%
content.
89.6%
This
99.8%
kind
99.6%
of
99.9%
whole
99.8%
process
100.0%
AI
99.6%
journalism
100.0%
is
100.0%
already
100.0%
here.
94.2%
In
99.9%
a
100.0%
report
100.0%
last
100.0%
month,
100.0%
the
99.9%
news
99.9%
credibility
100.0%
rating
100.0%
company
100.0%
NewsGuard
89.7%
found
100.0%
49
100.0%
news
53.0%
sites
100.0%
across
100.0%
seven
100.0%
languages
96.7%
that
100.0%
appeared
98.1%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
mostly
100.0%
or
99.6%
entirely
100.0%
AI
99.9%
generated.
100.0%
These
99.6%
sites
99.9%
were
99.9%
publishing
86.9%
hundreds
99.8%
of
100.0%
articles
100.0%
each
99.9%
day,
100.0%
often
100.0%
using
100.0%
profiles
100.0%
for
99.8%
authors
100.0%
that
99.6%
in
100.0%
reality
100.0%
don't
99.9%
exist,
100.0%
and
99.9%
sometimes
98.9%
posting
100.0%
stories
79.6%
that
99.9%
didn't
99.8%
exist
100.0%
in
100.0%
reality
100.0%
either.
99.9%
Ironically,
100.0%
one
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
top
100.0%
results
100.0%
when
99.9%
searching
100.0%
for
100.0%
reporting
89.9%
about
100.0%
AI
100.0%
in
83.5%
journalism
99.9%
is
99.0%
from
99.8%
the
99.9%
Washington
100.0%
Post,
100.0%
which
100.0%
itself
99.9%
became
80.9%
known
100.0%
for
100.0%
its
99.7%
use
100.0%
of
99.9%
AI
99.9%
to
100.0%
cover
100.0%
the
99.9%
2016
99.9%
Rio
99.7%
Olympics
100.0%
and
99.7%
congressional
100.0%
election
100.0%
results.
99.9%
So
98.5%
the
99.7%
tools
100.0%
are
99.9%
already
99.9%
being
99.9%
used,
100.0%
but
99.9%
they
99.4%
also
99.7%
have
100.0%
their
99.8%
limits.
99.5%
Just
99.8%
last
99.9%
month,
100.0%
two
99.5%
French
98.2%
journalists,
98.4%
Jean
97.4%
Ranier
80.9%
and
99.8%
Maurice
97.5%
de
44.2%
Ramberteau,
77.1%
specializing
86.9%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
potential
100.0%
and
99.2%
limits
100.0%
of
99.9%
AI
98.8%
and
61.4%
journalism,
78.1%
wrote
99.1%
about
100.0%
their
99.8%
experiment
96.6%
pushing
100.0%
the
99.9%
program
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
99.5%
limits,
99.9%
ending
100.0%
in
99.5%
a
99.8%
250
99.6%
page
100.0%
report
99.9%
written
99.9%
by
100.0%
AI
99.0%
detailing
100.0%
the
99.9%
main
100.0%
trends
94.4%
of
99.4%
the
99.8%
CES
99.8%
technology
99.9%
show
100.0%
in
99.9%
Las
100.0%
Vegas.
100.0%
According
100.0%
to
100.0%
one
99.8%
report
100.0%
on
99.8%
the
99.8%
results,
87.5%
the
99.2%
AI
99.9%
struggled
90.5%
to
100.0%
identify
100.0%
the
99.9%
main
100.0%
trends
99.9%
at
99.5%
AH
86.4%
CES
99.9%
and
99.9%
could
100.0%
not
100.0%
produce
100.0%
a
99.9%
summary
100.0%
worthy
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.8%
journalist.
99.3%
It
99.9%
also
100.0%
pilfered
99.9%
wholesale
100.0%
from
99.2%
Wikipedia.
98.6%
The
99.7%
authors
99.9%
found
100.0%
that
96.9%
they
99.8%
needed
99.8%
to
100.0%
intervene
98.2%
constantly
84.3%
to
100.0%
keep
100.0%
the
99.9%
process
100.0%
on
100.0%
track.
99.9%
So
100.0%
while
99.9%
the
99.6%
programs
96.7%
helped
89.8%
save
99.7%
some
99.1%
time
100.0%
they
99.9%
were
99.9%
not
99.9%
yet
99.7%
fit
99.9%
to
100.0%
replace
96.0%
real
100.0%
journalists,
100.0%
because
99.7%
that's
99.7%
the
99.8%
question
100.0%
seeping
100.0%
into
99.6%
the
99.7%
Are
99.0%
journalists
97.2%
jobs
99.9%
at
99.9%
risk?
100.0%
With
100.0%
the
99.9%
announcement
100.0%
of
100.0%
buzzfeed
96.2%
News
98.8%
closure
99.8%
came
100.0%
a
99.9%
memo
100.0%
from
99.9%
Vander
77.7%
Paretti
82.3%
that
99.3%
openly
100.0%
stated
94.6%
we
98.2%
will
99.7%
bring
100.0%
more
99.9%
innovation
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
form
99.8%
of
99.7%
creat,
99.9%
AI
85.7%
and
100.0%
cultural
100.0%
moments,
99.8%
seemingly
99.9%
confirming
100.0%
that
93.7%
AI
99.7%
was
99.9%
at
99.6%
least
100.0%
in
99.6%
part
100.0%
to
99.9%
blame
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
97.8%
decision.
100.0%
At
99.7%
the
99.8%
heart
100.0%
of
99.7%
this
99.8%
is
99.6%
the
99.8%
question
99.9%
of
99.3%
what
99.9%
journalism
100.0%
should
100.0%
be
99.8%
and
99.5%
the
99.9%
ways
99.9%
our
98.8%
modern
100.0%
world
100.0%
of
99.0%
free
100.0%
content,
100.0%
ad
64.8%
based
99.2%
funding,
100.0%
fast
100.0%
paced
98.8%
news
99.9%
cycles
100.0%
and
99.8%
extreme
100.0%
algorithms
92.9%
have
99.7%
impacted
99.9%
it.
99.8%
This
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
just
99.9%
AI
99.4%
coming
100.0%
from
100.0%
nowhere
99.9%
to
99.9%
take
99.9%
a
99.6%
wrecking
94.5%
ball
99.9%
to
99.8%
an
99.5%
industry.
99.8%
It's
98.2%
one
99.9%
element
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
97.7%
long
100.0%
process
100.0%
of
99.9%
change
100.0%
the
99.4%
industry
100.0%
has
99.7%
been
99.9%
going
100.0%
through
99.9%
during
99.8%
the
99.8%
age
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.8%
Internet
99.7%
that
99.4%
prioritises
85.6%
eyeballs
91.9%
no
100.0%
matter
100.0%
the
99.6%
ethical
100.0%
cost,
100.0%
because
100.0%
views
84.0%
correlate
99.0%
to
99.9%
ad
99.9%
money,
99.6%
which
99.8%
is
100.0%
what
100.0%
funds
99.9%
most
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
news
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
Internet.
100.0%
For
100.0%
many,
100.0%
looking
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
future
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.8%
industry,
100.0%
they're
94.4%
asking
82.0%
are
100.0%
there
99.9%
elements
100.0%
of
100.0%
journalism
100.0%
that
99.9%
can't
85.4%
be
100.0%
done
100.0%
by
100.0%
AI?
83.9%
Typically
100.0%
these
100.0%
conversations
100.0%
centre
66.6%
around
100.0%
deep,
100.0%
original
100.0%
reporting,
91.8%
but
99.9%
Shivani
91.3%
also
99.9%
sees
100.0%
a
100.0%
gap
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
99.4%
more
99.9%
fluffy
98.5%
Zeitgeist
98.7%
style
91.6%
articles
99.9%
too.
98.0%
For
97.9%
some
100.0%
of
99.9%
those
99.4%
fun
99.9%
elements
100.0%
of
100.0%
journalism,
81.1%
some
99.8%
of
99.5%
those
99.6%
lighter
99.4%
stories,
100.0%
there
99.9%
will
99.9%
be
100.0%
this
99.9%
encroachment
95.4%
of
99.6%
seeing
98.9%
whether
100.0%
or
99.8%
not
100.0%
AI
96.3%
can
100.0%
do
100.0%
that.
99.9%
But
99.5%
I
100.0%
think
99.9%
fundamentally,
90.6%
at
99.9%
least
100.0%
at
99.4%
the
99.5%
point
100.0%
where
56.0%
we
99.9%
are
100.0%
now
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
99.9%
technology,
100.0%
AI
93.7%
will
99.9%
never
100.0%
be
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
99.9%
understand
100.0%
and
96.3%
recreate
99.8%
that
99.7%
like
75.5%
human
100.0%
emotion,
99.2%
connection,
100.0%
whimsy,
96.2%
joy,
100.0%
that
99.4%
kind
97.1%
of
98.8%
like
88.1%
sense
100.0%
of
99.9%
a
99.3%
nation.
99.9%
In
99.1%
its
99.4%
most
100.0%
optimistic
100.0%
spaces.
99.7%
The
99.9%
conversation
100.0%
around
99.8%
journalism
100.0%
and
99.5%
AI
76.3%
looks
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
way
100.0%
it
100.0%
can
100.0%
elevate
100.0%
mental
100.0%
and
99.9%
psychological
99.8%
load,
94.3%
asking
99.9%
if
100.0%
AI
100.0%
is
99.9%
an
99.9%
opportunity
100.0%
to
100.0%
look
100.0%
after
100.0%
workers
100.0%
where
99.5%
a
99.8%
human
100.0%
being
99.9%
would
99.7%
typically
88.8%
be
99.7%
asked
100.0%
to
99.8%
shift
99.7%
through
99.4%
comments
100.0%
and
99.3%
manually
100.0%
assess
97.9%
and
99.5%
hide
99.8%
inappropriate
99.9%
contributors,
99.9%
including
99.1%
those
99.0%
that
97.9%
include
99.7%
slurs,
99.9%
threats
99.9%
and
99.8%
personal
99.9%
harassment
100.0%
of
99.8%
the
96.7%
writers.
99.8%
AI
97.3%
could
99.3%
be
99.8%
used
99.9%
to
99.3%
do
99.3%
this
99.5%
instead,
99.8%
but
98.7%
this
99.5%
potential
100.0%
does
98.0%
seem
100.0%
entirely
100.0%
down
99.9%
to
99.8%
those
99.9%
at
99.7%
the
99.9%
top
100.0%
of
99.9%
each
100.0%
organisation.
83.3%
When
99.9%
asked
100.0%
about
99.9%
the
97.9%
subject,
100.0%
Lisa
99.5%
Gibbs,
99.7%
Director
99.9%
of
99.8%
News
99.7%
Partnerships
99.8%
and
99.0%
AI
99.9%
News
99.9%
lead,
89.3%
ap,
99.8%
said
99.8%
it
98.9%
frees
99.6%
our
99.9%
journalists
99.0%
from
99.9%
routine
100.0%
tasks,
84.1%
tasks
90.7%
to
99.4%
do
100.0%
higher
99.8%
level
100.0%
work
100.0%
that
99.9%
uses
100.0%
their
99.8%
creativity,
100.0%
allows
99.9%
us
100.0%
to
100.0%
create
100.0%
more
100.0%
content
100.0%
that
100.0%
serves
90.9%
new
100.0%
audiences
96.0%
more
100.0%
efficiently
100.0%
and
99.8%
improves
100.0%
our
99.3%
ability
99.5%
to
100.0%
discover
99.7%
news.
99.9%
And
99.4%
each
100.0%
news
100.0%
organization
80.3%
must
100.0%
have
100.0%
an
99.9%
ethical
100.0%
framework
100.0%
for
99.8%
how
100.0%
to
100.0%
use
100.0%
it
99.9%
and
75.5%
understand
100.0%
its
99.9%
implications.
100.0%
That
99.6%
reliance
100.0%
on
100.0%
companies
100.0%
to
100.0%
pick
100.0%
and
100.0%
choose
100.0%
their
99.6%
own
99.9%
ethical
100.0%
framework
100.0%
is
99.4%
a
99.9%
symptom
100.0%
of
100.0%
technology
100.0%
that
100.0%
moves
98.1%
so
99.9%
much
100.0%
faster
100.0%
than
100.0%
legislation
100.0%
and
97.6%
moral
100.0%
consensus.
99.9%
Ethical
100.0%
issues
100.0%
already
100.0%
in
100.0%
existence
99.2%
in
96.5%
journalism
100.0%
won't
99.8%
suddenly
99.9%
disappear
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
100.0%
um,
44.0%
emergence
100.0%
of
99.9%
AI.
99.8%
In
99.9%
fact,
100.0%
they
99.9%
might
99.8%
be
100.0%
exacerbated
92.4%
by
100.0%
it.
99.9%
I
99.9%
already
99.9%
mentioned
93.0%
the
100.0%
impact
100.0%
of
100.0%
funding
100.0%
sources
99.9%
on
99.9%
the
99.9%
industry.
94.5%
How
100.0%
do
100.0%
we
99.9%
weigh
99.9%
up
97.5%
profit
100.0%
driven
100.0%
quantity
100.0%
models
100.0%
with
99.9%
the
70.5%
skills
99.8%
based
100.0%
humanitarian
98.7%
reporting
79.6%
style
100.0%
of
99.9%
journalism
100.0%
that
99.9%
is
99.4%
more
100.0%
expensive
100.0%
to
100.0%
produce?
99.9%
AI
98.1%
needs
99.9%
to
99.7%
be
99.8%
able
99.6%
to
96.9%
weigh
99.9%
up
96.7%
the
99.8%
priorities
100.0%
and
99.2%
I'm
99.8%
not
99.7%
sure
100.0%
that
98.8%
it
99.9%
can
100.0%
yet
99.9%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
way
100.0%
that
99.9%
also
99.8%
understands
99.8%
human
100.0%
experience
100.0%
and
97.4%
um,
96.2%
the
99.3%
timescales
88.2%
and
62.3%
like
59.2%
skills
100.0%
and
99.7%
expertise.
99.9%
I
99.3%
worry
93.3%
that
98.7%
what's
99.8%
happening
81.1%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
moment
100.0%
is
99.1%
there
99.9%
is
99.9%
less
100.0%
and
99.9%
less
100.0%
investment
100.0%
in
100.0%
investigative
99.9%
journalism.
100.0%
I
99.6%
think
100.0%
there's
99.9%
like
62.1%
a
100.0%
larger
100.0%
conversation
100.0%
that
99.7%
we
100.0%
could
100.0%
have
99.9%
about
100.0%
the
100.0%
way
99.9%
journalism
100.0%
is
100.0%
funded
100.0%
and
99.4%
like
65.1%
journalists
100.0%
are
99.8%
paid
100.0%
and
99.9%
things
100.0%
like
97.7%
that.
99.9%
But
99.6%
AI
99.8%
could
100.0%
really
100.0%
have
100.0%
the
99.9%
potential
100.0%
to
100.0%
make
100.0%
that
99.9%
situation
100.0%
a
99.9%
whole
100.0%
lot
100.0%
worse.
99.5%
Uh,
95.2%
and
98.5%
then
99.9%
we
99.9%
have
100.0%
the
100.0%
issue
100.0%
of
100.0%
fake
100.0%
news.
99.9%
We've
99.7%
already
100.0%
seen
100.0%
how
100.0%
AI
97.8%
has
99.9%
an
100.0%
issue
100.0%
with
99.9%
fact
100.0%
checking,
99.9%
sourcing
100.0%
and
99.7%
accuracy.
100.0%
So
99.9%
it
100.0%
shouldn't
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.9%
surprise
99.8%
that
99.7%
this
100.0%
is
99.9%
a
100.0%
concern
99.9%
if
99.9%
AI
98.5%
is
99.8%
scraping
100.0%
other
97.2%
new
77.7%
sources
100.0%
for
74.2%
information.
100.0%
This
100.0%
can
100.0%
absolutely
100.0%
become
100.0%
a
100.0%
vicious
100.0%
cycle
100.0%
of
99.4%
fabricated
100.0%
information
100.0%
by
99.8%
AI
99.7%
spiraling
94.1%
around
100.0%
those
98.4%
generated
100.0%
stories.
100.0%
The
98.6%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
constantly
100.0%
fight
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
99.9%
top
100.0%
spots
99.8%
on
99.7%
Google
100.0%
search
100.0%
results
100.0%
to
99.9%
get
100.0%
more
100.0%
viewers
100.0%
to
99.9%
pay
100.0%
for
99.9%
more
99.9%
ads
100.0%
to
99.9%
make
100.0%
more
99.9%
money
100.0%
hurts
99.8%
the
100.0%
quality
100.0%
of
62.3%
content,
100.0%
but
100.0%
is
79.6%
especially
100.0%
an
100.0%
issue
100.0%
when
99.8%
paired
100.0%
with
99.9%
AI
99.2%
as
98.6%
a
99.8%
tool.
99.7%
An
99.8%
anonymous
99.9%
former
99.7%
M
77.5%
employee
100.0%
at
99.4%
a
100.0%
website
99.8%
that
99.5%
publishes
100.0%
reviews,
100.0%
news
100.0%
and
99.5%
analysis
99.8%
on
99.7%
technology
99.9%
and
84.9%
elections
52.4%
Electronics
99.6%
went
99.4%
um,
82.7%
on
100.0%
record
99.9%
earlier
100.0%
this
99.9%
year
100.0%
to
99.4%
reveal
95.8%
they
99.9%
use
99.2%
AI
99.9%
to
100.0%
rewrite
99.9%
the
99.4%
intros
99.5%
every
100.0%
two
100.0%
weeks
100.0%
or
99.6%
so
100.0%
because
100.0%
Google
100.0%
likes
99.9%
updated
82.5%
content.
99.6%
Eventually
99.6%
it
100.0%
gets
100.0%
so
99.9%
mangled
95.0%
that
100.0%
about
99.9%
every
100.0%
four
100.0%
months
100.0%
a
99.9%
real
100.0%
editor
100.0%
has
99.8%
to
100.0%
look
100.0%
at
99.9%
it
99.9%
and
99.9%
rewrite
88.0%
it.
99.7%
The
100.0%
existence
100.0%
of
100.0%
so
99.8%
called
100.0%
content
100.0%
mills
99.9%
or
98.3%
content
99.7%
farms,
76.2%
sites
99.9%
that
96.7%
outsource
99.8%
their
99.9%
writing
100.0%
to
100.0%
freelancers
100.0%
for
99.9%
minimal
100.0%
pay
100.0%
and
83.4%
high
99.9%
speed
100.0%
good
99.9%
enough
100.0%
articles
100.0%
in
99.7%
return
100.0%
is
98.3%
another
100.0%
symptom
97.9%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
financial
100.0%
model
100.0%
of
100.0%
modern
99.9%
journalism
98.3%
where
99.4%
AI
99.9%
is
99.8%
taking
99.9%
over.
99.9%
Reporter
100.0%
Will
96.2%
Aramis
67.2%
summarized
95.9%
the
99.0%
dystopian
99.9%
end
98.3%
result
100.0%
in
99.9%
his
99.3%
article
100.0%
on
99.9%
AI
99.5%
journalism.
98.9%
The
99.7%
wide
99.9%
availability
98.7%
of
100.0%
tools
100.0%
like
99.9%
ChatGPT
99.2%
means
100.0%
more
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
99.9%
producing
94.2%
similarly
100.0%
cheap
100.0%
content
99.8%
and
99.8%
they're
97.5%
all
100.0%
competing
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
same
100.0%
slots
99.1%
in
99.9%
Google
100.0%
search
100.0%
results
99.9%
or
99.8%
Amazon's
99.8%
on
99.8%
site
98.9%
product
100.0%
reviews.
99.9%
So
99.9%
they
100.0%
all
99.9%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
crank
100.0%
out
100.0%
more
100.0%
and
99.9%
more
100.0%
article
100.0%
pages,
100.0%
each
100.0%
tuned
98.5%
to
100.0%
rank
100.0%
highly
100.0%
for
99.8%
specific
100.0%
search
89.0%
queries
100.0%
in
99.9%
hopes
87.7%
that
99.9%
a
100.0%
fraction
100.0%
will
99.9%
break
100.0%
through.
97.9%
The
100.0%
result
99.9%
is
99.9%
a
99.9%
deluge
89.3%
of
100.0%
AI
99.6%
written
99.7%
websites,
85.0%
many
99.8%
of
100.0%
which
100.0%
are
99.9%
never
100.0%
seen
100.0%
by
100.0%
human
100.0%
eyes.
100.0%
Part
100.0%
of
99.7%
the
99.8%
problem
100.0%
is
100.0%
the
99.1%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
transparency
93.9%
around
99.9%
the
99.7%
use
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
99.7%
technology.
99.6%
For
100.0%
the
100.0%
most
100.0%
part,
100.0%
we
100.0%
don't
99.8%
know
100.0%
who
100.0%
is
98.9%
using
100.0%
it
99.8%
or
99.9%
how
100.0%
they're
99.1%
using
99.9%
it
99.7%
within
99.6%
newsrooms.
89.7%
We're
99.4%
already
100.0%
seeing
100.0%
reports
100.0%
of
100.0%
newsrooms
100.0%
giving
100.0%
AI
99.5%
generated
100.0%
reporters
100.0%
human
100.0%
names
99.9%
and
99.8%
avatars
94.9%
to
100.0%
pass
99.4%
them
99.5%
off
99.7%
as
100.0%
human
100.0%
journalists.
100.0%
This
99.8%
obscuring
100.0%
of
99.9%
reality
100.0%
means
100.0%
it
99.9%
may
99.8%
be
99.9%
difficult
100.0%
to
100.0%
ascertain
99.7%
a
100.0%
chain
100.0%
of
100.0%
responsibility
99.9%
for
99.7%
poor
99.9%
reporting,
100.0%
misinformation
90.6%
and
99.8%
bias
99.7%
produced
100.0%
in
99.9%
these
99.2%
articles,
85.2%
because
99.6%
bias
96.2%
is
100.0%
a
99.9%
huge
100.0%
part
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
potential
99.9%
AI
99.8%
problem
100.0%
within
99.8%
journalism
100.0%
as
99.8%
well
100.0%
as
99.9%
every
100.0%
other
99.7%
industry.
100.0%
That
98.5%
it's
99.2%
a
98.8%
part
100.0%
of
99.8%
that
85.1%
idea
100.0%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.2%
video
100.0%
of
99.8%
AI
100.0%
being
100.0%
used
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
99.9%
hiring
100.0%
process
100.0%
is
99.6%
a
99.9%
classic
100.0%
example.
99.5%
Amazon
100.0%
got
100.0%
in
99.8%
hot
100.0%
water
100.0%
a
100.0%
few
100.0%
years
100.0%
ago
100.0%
when
99.8%
it
99.9%
was
99.9%
discovered
100.0%
that
99.8%
women
100.0%
were
99.9%
being
99.9%
discriminated
92.3%
against
100.0%
in
100.0%
their
99.7%
hiring
100.0%
process
99.9%
because
99.9%
the
100.0%
data
100.0%
used
100.0%
to
100.0%
train
100.0%
the
99.6%
AI
76.5%
that
99.9%
was
99.9%
picking
100.0%
candidates
95.0%
was
99.9%
used
100.0%
on
100.0%
existing
90.2%
employees,
98.6%
most
99.9%
of
100.0%
whom
99.9%
were
99.8%
men.
100.0%
So
99.8%
the
100.0%
algorithm
100.0%
interpreted
100.0%
the
100.0%
ideal
100.0%
candidate
87.4%
as
100.0%
male
100.0%
and
100.0%
rejected
100.0%
applications
98.4%
that
94.4%
suggested
99.9%
otherwise.
99.8%
There
99.9%
was
99.9%
arguably
99.9%
an
99.9%
existing
100.0%
bias
100.0%
in
99.8%
their
99.1%
human
99.9%
hiring
100.0%
process,
100.0%
but
99.9%
the
99.8%
AI
78.1%
was
99.8%
looking
100.0%
for
100.0%
patterns
99.5%
and
99.9%
ended
99.9%
up
99.9%
exacerbating
100.0%
the
99.8%
issue.
99.7%
I
100.0%
recently
100.0%
spoke
100.0%
to
99.9%
someone
100.0%
I
99.9%
know
99.8%
who
99.9%
works
99.9%
on
100.0%
police
100.0%
data
100.0%
who
99.9%
ran
100.0%
some
99.7%
analysis
99.8%
to
100.0%
understand
99.9%
what
99.9%
factors
85.3%
were
99.6%
correlated
100.0%
with
99.7%
a
98.0%
suspect
100.0%
being
100.0%
identified.
100.0%
This
99.9%
analysis,
100.0%
hypothetically
100.0%
might
99.9%
help
100.0%
prioritise
91.8%
which
100.0%
crimes
100.0%
were
99.8%
worth
100.0%
putting
100.0%
resources
99.9%
into,
99.6%
as
97.8%
they
99.9%
were
99.8%
more
99.8%
likely
100.0%
to
99.8%
end
100.0%
in
98.7%
a
98.9%
perpetrator
100.0%
being
100.0%
identified
100.0%
or
99.9%
the
99.3%
crime
100.0%
being
99.9%
solved
100.0%
only
99.9%
when
100.0%
he
99.1%
fed
100.0%
it
99.7%
actual
100.0%
crime
97.1%
data.
99.7%
The
99.7%
learning
99.6%
model
100.0%
gave
99.9%
the
99.9%
output
100.0%
that
99.7%
crimes
100.0%
with
99.5%
female
100.0%
victims
100.0%
don't
100.0%
have
100.0%
suspects
99.9%
identified
100.0%
and
99.9%
crimes
100.0%
with
98.4%
male
100.0%
victims
100.0%
do.
99.6%
So
99.6%
if
99.9%
you
99.3%
were,
99.3%
uh,
98.7%
to
99.2%
use
100.0%
this
99.3%
in
99.7%
the
99.8%
real
99.8%
world,
99.9%
the
100.0%
logical
100.0%
conclusion
99.6%
would
99.9%
be
99.8%
to
98.7%
not
100.0%
investigate
100.0%
crimes
100.0%
with
98.5%
female
100.0%
victims
100.0%
as
100.0%
it
99.9%
would
99.8%
be
99.9%
a
99.7%
waste
93.3%
of
100.0%
resources.
93.2%
He
85.2%
told
99.4%
me.
89.3%
One
99.6%
of
99.6%
the
99.6%
things
99.9%
that
99.8%
stood
100.0%
out
100.0%
for
98.3%
me
99.9%
is
99.2%
if
100.0%
I
99.9%
had
99.4%
used
100.0%
a
99.9%
different
100.0%
algorithm
99.7%
that
99.9%
was
99.9%
less
100.0%
easily
100.0%
interpretable,
100.0%
I
99.9%
potentially
100.0%
wouldn't
99.9%
have
99.9%
known
99.9%
what
99.9%
decision
99.9%
it
86.7%
was
100.0%
making,
100.0%
so
99.9%
wouldn't
100.0%
have
99.9%
known
99.9%
that
98.9%
that
100.0%
was
99.6%
what
99.9%
was
100.0%
happening
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
background.
98.9%
So
99.8%
not
100.0%
only
100.0%
is
100.0%
the
99.9%
inequality
99.5%
or
99.8%
bias
99.9%
present
100.0%
before
100.0%
AI
85.3%
is
99.9%
involved,
99.9%
but
100.0%
there
100.0%
is
100.0%
a
100.0%
risk
100.0%
that
100.0%
without
100.0%
human
100.0%
oversight,
84.4%
unknown
99.7%
biases
99.9%
could
99.9%
seep
100.0%
into
100.0%
AI
99.7%
decision
100.0%
making
100.0%
that
99.6%
might
100.0%
affect
85.2%
an
99.8%
organization's
86.2%
output,
100.0%
policies,
99.9%
regulations
100.0%
and
81.7%
projects
100.0%
going
100.0%
forwards
97.3%
and
99.8%
leave
99.8%
major
100.0%
problems
100.0%
unsolved.
100.0%
So
99.5%
where
100.0%
might
100.0%
we
100.0%
see
100.0%
these
100.0%
issues
100.0%
in
100.0%
AI
99.2%
journalism?
100.0%
Let's
85.4%
start
100.0%
with
100.0%
what
99.8%
stories
100.0%
are
55.9%
even
99.3%
considered
100.0%
worthy
100.0%
of
100.0%
reporting.
94.6%
With
99.9%
companies
100.0%
using
100.0%
event
99.9%
detection
78.1%
systems
99.8%
that
99.7%
will
99.6%
identify
86.5%
breaking
100.0%
news
100.0%
and
100.0%
trending
100.0%
stories
86.5%
via
100.0%
social
100.0%
media,
99.9%
we
99.8%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
that
99.8%
decision
99.9%
becomes
99.9%
skewed
98.5%
by
100.0%
who
100.0%
does
99.8%
and
73.0%
doesn't
100.0%
use
100.0%
the
93.8%
social
100.0%
media
100.0%
platforms
85.3%
being
99.9%
searched.
100.0%
Shivani
93.6%
was
100.0%
all
99.6%
too
99.7%
aware
94.0%
of
99.9%
how
100.0%
the
100.0%
financial
100.0%
model
100.0%
of
99.6%
journalism
100.0%
could
99.9%
lead
100.0%
to
99.8%
AI
100.0%
finding
98.8%
patterns
100.0%
around
99.9%
the
100.0%
type
99.9%
of
100.0%
negative
100.0%
content
100.0%
that
100.0%
gets
99.9%
views
99.9%
if
99.2%
programmed
97.8%
for,
95.0%
look
99.8%
for
99.8%
the
99.6%
most
100.0%
clickable
98.9%
and
98.8%
therefore
76.3%
profitable
99.8%
stories
98.8%
or
99.3%
headlines.
99.9%
If
99.7%
it's
99.6%
going
86.6%
to
59.2%
strip
100.0%
it
99.8%
all
99.3%
back
100.0%
and
99.5%
re
99.5%
editorialise
87.4%
it
99.5%
in
99.9%
a
99.9%
way
100.0%
that
98.5%
either
97.8%
makes
99.9%
people
100.0%
angry
100.0%
or
99.8%
emotive,
99.6%
which
100.0%
is
100.0%
what
100.0%
sells
76.5%
newspapers
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
moment,
100.0%
I
99.8%
think
100.0%
that
100.0%
could
98.4%
be
100.0%
really
99.6%
really
100.0%
worrying
99.9%
because
99.9%
when
100.0%
it's
99.6%
anger
99.9%
and
99.2%
emotion
100.0%
that
92.3%
ah
58.9%
is
99.0%
selling
99.3%
the
98.7%
newspapers,
99.9%
it's
97.5%
also
99.9%
a
100.0%
lot
99.9%
of
99.8%
fear,
78.8%
prejudice,
87.3%
bias.
84.2%
I
99.7%
just
99.6%
really
100.0%
believe
100.0%
that
99.8%
the
99.9%
system
100.0%
that
99.8%
we
100.0%
work
100.0%
under
99.5%
within
99.9%
journalism
100.0%
is
100.0%
not
100.0%
a
90.4%
sustainable
100.0%
system.
100.0%
And
98.5%
I
67.8%
I
99.6%
think
99.8%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
moment,
100.0%
from
99.9%
what
100.0%
I've
99.6%
seen,
100.0%
and
99.9%
I'm
99.7%
happy
100.0%
to,
96.6%
I
99.8%
would
100.0%
gladly
100.0%
be
98.8%
be
54.3%
proven
93.3%
wrong
100.0%
if
100.0%
somebody
99.8%
can
100.0%
show
100.0%
me
99.9%
that
99.3%
I
99.9%
am
99.9%
wrong.
100.0%
I
99.3%
just
98.5%
really
99.5%
think
100.0%
that
96.3%
the
99.9%
system
100.0%
of
99.2%
AI
97.3%
that
99.8%
we
100.0%
have
100.0%
at
99.9%
the
100.0%
moment
100.0%
will
99.6%
make
100.0%
the
100.0%
structure
99.5%
of
79.8%
the
99.0%
industry
99.9%
of
99.8%
journalism
100.0%
worse.
97.8%
I
98.9%
don't
99.7%
think
100.0%
it's
99.5%
overly
99.9%
pessimistic
100.0%
to
99.9%
suggest
100.0%
that
99.7%
the
100.0%
existing
100.0%
lean
79.1%
of
99.9%
capitalistic
99.4%
journalism,
100.0%
either
100.0%
towards
99.8%
churning
98.8%
out
99.9%
negative
99.9%
outrage
99.9%
or
99.9%
fear
99.9%
inducing
100.0%
stories
100.0%
to
99.9%
get
100.0%
eyeballs
99.8%
on
99.7%
banner
88.0%
ads
99.9%
or
97.1%
heavily
94.5%
biased
97.7%
pieces
99.8%
that
99.9%
spread
100.0%
the
100.0%
political
100.0%
or
99.8%
social
100.0%
views
99.8%
of
100.0%
rich
99.9%
media
100.0%
owners,
99.9%
will
99.7%
not
100.0%
necessarily
89.2%
be
100.0%
made
99.9%
better
100.0%
by
99.9%
the
99.8%
use
100.0%
of
100.0%
AI.
99.7%
Because
99.8%
we
100.0%
know
100.0%
that
98.9%
AI
99.8%
has
100.0%
the
92.3%
potential
100.0%
to
100.0%
soak
100.0%
up
99.7%
bias
93.6%
like
100.0%
a
100.0%
damn
98.8%
sponge,
89.0%
even
100.0%
from
99.8%
right
99.9%
at
98.8%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
when
99.9%
we
99.9%
look
100.0%
at
99.9%
who
100.0%
is
99.3%
creating
99.0%
them
99.9%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
place.
99.9%
Homogeneous
91.2%
teams
100.0%
of
99.9%
developers
99.9%
will
99.9%
inevitably
100.0%
have
100.0%
gaps
100.0%
in
100.0%
their
99.9%
knowledge,
99.6%
perception
98.8%
and
86.7%
experiences.
99.7%
But
99.5%
this
100.0%
is
100.0%
especially
100.0%
impactful
100.0%
with
99.9%
projects
100.0%
like
99.9%
developing
90.7%
AI,
99.3%
where
99.2%
we
99.8%
also
99.8%
have
99.9%
to
100.0%
think
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.9%
data
100.0%
that's
98.6%
being
99.9%
used
100.0%
to
100.0%
train
99.9%
it.
96.0%
A
99.9%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
cultural
100.0%
or
99.9%
experiential
97.7%
knowledge
100.0%
at
99.9%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
can
99.9%
have
100.0%
a
99.9%
massive
100.0%
ripple
100.0%
effect.
100.0%
Before
100.0%
Reddit's
99.7%
decision
100.0%
last
100.0%
month
100.0%
to
99.9%
put
100.0%
its
99.4%
API
99.8%
behind
100.0%
a
99.9%
paywall,
98.8%
it
99.8%
was
100.0%
seen
100.0%
as
100.0%
an
99.9%
obvious
100.0%
choice
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
99.9%
training
100.0%
of
99.9%
large
100.0%
language
100.0%
models
100.0%
by
99.8%
many.
98.2%
Even
100.0%
now
100.0%
the
98.9%
attitude
90.4%
seems
99.8%
to
99.9%
be
99.8%
a
99.7%
conversation
100.0%
around
99.8%
how
100.0%
companies
100.0%
will
99.7%
pay
100.0%
for
99.9%
the
97.9%
access,
99.8%
not
99.8%
whether
100.0%
the
98.9%
data
100.0%
being
98.8%
accessed
98.5%
is
99.8%
the
99.9%
right
99.8%
kind
99.7%
of
86.5%
tool.
99.9%
Journalist
99.4%
Chris
87.7%
Stoker
99.1%
Walker
99.9%
has
97.9%
pointed
99.9%
out
99.9%
that
99.8%
in
99.6%
fact
99.5%
Reddit's
99.8%
dataset
89.1%
was
99.5%
shown
99.9%
to
99.8%
have
99.9%
negative
99.8%
gender,
100.0%
religious
98.4%
and
99.2%
ethnic
93.8%
bias
92.2%
biases
99.2%
in
99.3%
a
99.9%
2021
99.9%
study
100.0%
and
67.9%
gender
99.9%
biases
99.9%
against
100.0%
women
99.9%
politicians
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
2022
99.6%
research
100.0%
paper,
99.9%
we
100.0%
can
100.0%
see
100.0%
how
100.0%
the
99.7%
data
100.0%
input
99.9%
can
99.9%
hold
100.0%
biases
100.0%
when
100.0%
we
100.0%
look
100.0%
at
99.9%
what
100.0%
it's
94.6%
produced
100.0%
at
99.9%
the
100.0%
other
100.0%
end.
100.0%
With
100.0%
image
100.0%
generating
99.0%
AI
99.9%
like
99.9%
Lensa,
82.1%
criticized
82.9%
by
99.9%
users
100.0%
for
100.0%
sexualizing
94.4%
images
100.0%
of
100.0%
women
100.0%
by
100.0%
default,
100.0%
for
99.1%
example,
100.0%
to
100.0%
test
100.0%
the
99.4%
software,
100.0%
the
100.0%
Guardian
99.9%
uploaded
100.0%
images
100.0%
of
100.0%
three
100.0%
different
99.9%
famous
99.9%
feminists,
85.8%
Betty
93.7%
Frieden,
86.1%
Shirley
93.2%
Chisholm
96.0%
and
99.7%
Amelia
94.1%
Earhart.
88.2%
The
100.0%
author
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.8%
Feminine
100.0%
Mystique
100.0%
became
99.9%
a
99.4%
nymph.
99.4%
Light
79.0%
full
99.7%
chest
89.4%
young
97.5%
woman
99.7%
clad
99.8%
in
99.9%
piles
99.9%
of
100.0%
curls
99.9%
and
99.8%
a
99.9%
slip
99.7%
dress.
87.2%
Chisholm,
91.6%
um,
98.5%
the
99.9%
first
100.0%
black
100.0%
woman
99.8%
elected
99.9%
to
99.8%
U.S.
93.9%
congress
99.6%
had
100.0%
a
100.0%
wasp
99.8%
waist.
99.8%
And
99.7%
the
99.9%
aviation
99.9%
pioneer
96.7%
was
100.0%
rendered
100.0%
naked
99.9%
leaning
100.0%
on
100.0%
what
99.9%
appeared
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.8%
bed.
99.9%
All
99.9%
of
99.7%
the
100.0%
photos
99.6%
submitted
99.8%
by
100.0%
the
100.0%
Guardian
98.4%
showed
93.3%
the
99.9%
icons
100.0%
at
98.7%
various
78.1%
stages
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
100.0%
lives.
99.6%
The
100.0%
majority
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
AI
99.8%
rendered
100.0%
photos
100.0%
we
99.9%
received
100.0%
back
100.0%
showed
99.8%
them
100.0%
quite
100.0%
young
100.0%
with
100.0%
smooth
100.0%
skin
100.0%
and
56.1%
few
100.0%
wrinkles.
100.0%
So
99.7%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
it's
99.9%
pretty
100.0%
clear
100.0%
that
99.6%
given
99.7%
analytical
99.9%
tasks,
87.1%
AI
99.3%
is
99.8%
currently
99.9%
lacking.
85.1%
It
99.5%
isn't
100.0%
just
100.0%
that
99.7%
it
99.9%
can
99.8%
replicate
100.0%
existing
100.0%
biases
99.6%
that
99.8%
might
99.6%
be
99.9%
present,
100.0%
but
100.0%
that
94.1%
its
74.8%
systems
99.8%
are
100.0%
in
100.0%
danger
100.0%
of
99.9%
exacerbating
100.0%
them
99.9%
without
99.9%
careful
100.0%
consideration
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.8%
possibility
99.4%
throughout
99.8%
the
99.9%
process
100.0%
of
99.9%
building,
100.0%
training
100.0%
and
56.2%
using
100.0%
them.
99.9%
So
99.5%
Jiri
86.0%
is
97.8%
still
99.9%
out
99.9%
on
99.8%
creativity
100.0%
and
99.9%
analysis,
100.0%
but
99.8%
what
99.9%
about
100.0%
straightforward,
96.6%
logical
100.0%
tasks?
99.8%
The
92.4%
postal
99.0%
worker.
99.5%
There
99.9%
are
99.8%
lots
99.1%
of
99.9%
jobs
100.0%
that
99.6%
have
100.0%
tasks
98.3%
that
99.5%
are
99.1%
ultimately
99.5%
down
100.0%
to
100.0%
logic.
98.3%
In
92.3%
those
99.9%
situations,
89.3%
AI
99.9%
would
99.8%
simply
99.8%
be
100.0%
more
99.9%
efficient,
100.0%
right?
99.1%
So
94.4%
prior
100.0%
to
100.0%
any
100.0%
automation
100.0%
or
99.9%
AI
98.0%
involved
88.8%
we
100.0%
would
100.0%
manually
100.0%
send
100.0%
out
100.0%
invoices.
100.0%
If,
99.5%
um,
98.2%
customer
97.6%
hasn't
100.0%
paid,
100.0%
we'll
98.7%
send
100.0%
them
100.0%
an
100.0%
email,
99.8%
maybe
100.0%
give
100.0%
them
100.0%
a
100.0%
call,
100.0%
try
99.9%
and
99.9%
collect,
88.9%
um,
97.8%
the
100.0%
balance.
91.4%
If
99.9%
they
100.0%
didn't
100.0%
pay
100.0%
or
81.7%
didn't
100.0%
return
100.0%
any
98.7%
contact
99.8%
with,
34.1%
then,
79.8%
you
56.2%
know,
99.8%
manually
100.0%
block
94.9%
the
100.0%
account.
99.9%
Everything's
93.0%
sort
99.9%
of
100.0%
a
85.7%
more
100.0%
of
99.9%
a
100.0%
manual
100.0%
process
100.0%
where
100.0%
it's
100.0%
all
99.9%
done,
99.9%
um,
96.4%
by
99.4%
us.
100.0%
And
99.7%
so
100.0%
we
100.0%
have
100.0%
I
99.5%
guess,
99.9%
a
99.8%
better
99.2%
record
99.9%
of
100.0%
what
75.5%
is
99.9%
happening
88.8%
to
100.0%
each
100.0%
account
100.0%
because
100.0%
we're
98.9%
having
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
it.
100.0%
And
99.8%
that's
99.3%
basically
100.0%
what,
95.6%
what
86.3%
the
98.3%
job
100.0%
entailed.
86.7%
This
99.2%
interviewee
86.4%
works
99.9%
for
99.9%
a
99.9%
postal
100.0%
service.
100.0%
Higher
98.5%
ups
91.9%
decided
100.0%
to
100.0%
institute
100.0%
an
99.9%
AI
100.0%
program
100.0%
to
100.0%
automate
100.0%
certain
100.0%
parts
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
99.2%
job,
99.9%
ostensibly
99.9%
as
99.9%
a
99.8%
way
100.0%
to
99.7%
decrease
100.0%
costs
99.8%
and
56.2%
increase
100.0%
efficiency.
100.0%
But
99.3%
the
99.4%
AI
99.8%
automation
100.0%
made
99.9%
things
99.9%
a
98.4%
lot
100.0%
harder.
99.7%
Normally
100.0%
if
100.0%
a
99.8%
customer
100.0%
missed
100.0%
a
99.7%
payment,
100.0%
postal
79.3%
employees
82.4%
would
99.8%
first
99.9%
email
100.0%
reminders
100.0%
to
99.7%
their
99.7%
customers
99.9%
about
100.0%
overdue
99.9%
fees,
100.0%
giving
100.0%
them
100.0%
another
99.9%
chance
100.0%
to
100.0%
explain
100.0%
and
99.1%
pay
100.0%
and
99.2%
extending
74.1%
the
75.3%
access
99.9%
to
99.8%
their
99.3%
account.
100.0%
The
99.9%
AI
99.7%
systems
97.0%
started
100.0%
automatically
93.9%
blocking
96.6%
accounts
100.0%
that
96.8%
missed
95.0%
M
86.3%
A
99.8%
payment
100.0%
immediately.
89.0%
We're
85.2%
now
100.0%
sort
98.8%
of
99.9%
pivoted
99.6%
towards
99.9%
just
99.9%
dealing
100.0%
with
99.9%
inquiries
99.3%
from
100.0%
the
100.0%
customer,
100.0%
which
99.9%
is
99.9%
usually
99.8%
why
99.8%
is
99.6%
my
100.0%
account
100.0%
blocked?
99.8%
What's
100.0%
going
100.0%
on?
99.7%
Them
95.7%
getting
100.0%
angry?
100.0%
It's
99.6%
essentially
100.0%
because
99.9%
the
84.9%
bot
98.4%
slash
75.7%
AI,
99.8%
it
93.3%
can
100.0%
get
100.0%
to
99.6%
accounts
99.9%
quicker.
100.0%
It
99.8%
just
99.9%
does
91.3%
a
99.8%
blanket,
99.8%
uh,
91.0%
you
81.6%
know,
100.0%
any
100.0%
account
100.0%
that's
100.0%
overdue,
99.8%
it'll
99.6%
just
99.9%
block.
100.0%
So
99.3%
when
100.0%
it
99.9%
was
100.0%
first
100.0%
introduced,
94.2%
I
99.9%
had
100.0%
about
100.0%
800
100.0%
accounts
100.0%
just
99.6%
blocked
96.6%
overnight.
100.0%
What
100.0%
they
99.0%
have
99.9%
advised
100.0%
is
99.9%
basically
79.6%
they
100.0%
want
100.0%
the
100.0%
bot
98.4%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
tool
100.0%
to
100.0%
help
100.0%
us
99.9%
be
99.9%
more
99.4%
efficient.
81.3%
Efficient,
97.4%
but
99.2%
in
100.0%
terms
100.0%
of
100.0%
helping
90.9%
us
100.0%
be
98.8%
more
100.0%
efficient,
100.0%
it's
99.3%
more.
99.9%
So
98.7%
they
99.9%
want
99.8%
this
100.0%
particular
100.0%
role
62.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
more
100.0%
efficient
100.0%
so
99.9%
they
99.7%
can
100.0%
kind
89.3%
of
99.8%
cut
100.0%
costs
100.0%
with
100.0%
labor
87.7%
and
65.1%
wages.
100.0%
This
99.6%
indiscriminate
99.6%
blocking
100.0%
of
100.0%
accounts
100.0%
was
99.9%
obviously
100.0%
confusing
92.6%
for
99.9%
customers.
99.4%
To
100.0%
make
100.0%
things
100.0%
worse,
99.2%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
100.0%
didn't
100.0%
realise
70.7%
that
93.1%
they
99.9%
were
100.0%
interacting
100.0%
with
100.0%
an
99.1%
AI
100.0%
at
99.9%
all.
99.3%
Remember
100.0%
the
99.3%
fact
100.0%
that
99.8%
newsrooms
97.0%
have
98.6%
reportedly
100.0%
been
100.0%
disguising
100.0%
AI
100.0%
as
100.0%
fictional
100.0%
journalists?
99.8%
Well,
99.9%
that
99.9%
decision
100.0%
to
100.0%
mask
99.9%
an
99.7%
AI
99.9%
and
100.0%
pass
99.9%
it
99.7%
off
99.9%
as
100.0%
a
99.5%
human
100.0%
worker
100.0%
was
100.0%
a
99.8%
policy
100.0%
here
99.9%
too.
99.8%
But
100.0%
this
100.0%
particular
99.9%
program
99.9%
digitally
99.6%
disguised
99.4%
itself
100.0%
not
100.0%
just
100.0%
as
99.9%
a
99.9%
fictional
100.0%
human
100.0%
employee,
100.0%
but
99.9%
a
100.0%
real
100.0%
human
100.0%
employee
100.0%
within
100.0%
the
99.9%
team.
99.7%
Currently,
87.8%
as
91.7%
it
96.9%
stands,
99.9%
the
97.0%
bot,
99.1%
when
99.9%
it
100.0%
sends
78.8%
out
98.0%
emails,
100.0%
it
98.0%
actually
99.9%
sends
99.8%
it
99.4%
with
83.4%
our
96.5%
email
100.0%
signature.
100.0%
So
97.4%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
think
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
95.8%
people
100.0%
realize
97.7%
that
99.9%
it
99.9%
is
99.9%
a
96.9%
bot
99.5%
sending
100.0%
out
100.0%
those
99.9%
emails.
99.9%
They
99.7%
think
100.0%
the
95.7%
emails
100.0%
that
99.8%
we
100.0%
write
98.7%
are
99.7%
very
99.9%
cold,
100.0%
which
100.0%
is
98.3%
understandably
96.7%
because
92.4%
it's
99.9%
just
99.9%
a
99.9%
generic
100.0%
email
99.8%
with
98.2%
plug
99.7%
in
98.4%
their
100.0%
account
100.0%
details.
100.0%
Um,
94.8%
so
85.2%
it's
100.0%
never
100.0%
going
81.7%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
tailored
100.0%
to
98.3%
them.
84.1%
So
97.4%
how
100.0%
is
79.3%
the
99.9%
work
100.0%
he
99.8%
does
100.0%
directly
100.0%
with
100.0%
customers
99.9%
a
99.8%
different
100.0%
experience?
99.9%
It
99.7%
feels
100.0%
like
98.7%
you
99.6%
can
100.0%
build
100.0%
some
100.0%
sort
99.8%
of
100.0%
rapport,
99.9%
you
99.8%
have
100.0%
a
100.0%
relationship
98.5%
with
92.4%
them
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
99.9%
just
100.0%
feeling
100.0%
like
99.7%
it's
100.0%
very
100.0%
transactional.
99.9%
Whereas
99.8%
with
99.8%
the
99.9%
bot,
96.8%
everything
97.9%
just,
97.4%
it's
99.8%
very
99.5%
matter
99.9%
of
99.9%
the
99.8%
fact,
99.9%
everything
100.0%
is
99.9%
declarative.
100.0%
It's
99.6%
just,
99.6%
this
99.9%
is
100.0%
what's
99.8%
happened.
99.9%
There's
99.8%
no
100.0%
empathy
99.9%
in
87.0%
it.
99.4%
And
96.6%
this
99.8%
lack
99.9%
of
100.0%
empathy
100.0%
actually
99.7%
makes
99.9%
the
100.0%
process
100.0%
more
100.0%
inefficient,
99.9%
not
99.8%
less.
99.6%
Whoever
99.9%
decided
100.0%
to
100.0%
implement
100.0%
the
99.7%
AI
81.0%
looked
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
100.0%
task
98.6%
of
100.0%
managing
100.0%
late
100.0%
payments
78.1%
and
100.0%
thought
100.0%
that
98.7%
it
99.9%
could
99.8%
be
99.6%
easily
100.0%
automated.
100.0%
But
97.7%
there's
99.7%
actually
99.8%
a
100.0%
fair
100.0%
amount
100.0%
of
99.9%
nuance
100.0%
to
99.9%
that
99.9%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
job,
92.8%
nuance
99.8%
that
94.3%
the
99.9%
AI
99.9%
was
99.9%
not
100.0%
set
100.0%
up
99.9%
to
100.0%
handle.
99.9%
You
42.3%
can't
99.8%
differentiate
100.0%
why
100.0%
the
100.0%
customer
100.0%
hasn't
100.0%
paid.
100.0%
So
97.9%
I
99.8%
think
100.0%
that's
99.7%
a
99.7%
really
100.0%
important
100.0%
aspect
99.9%
in
99.9%
credit
100.0%
because
99.0%
if
100.0%
you
99.9%
don't
100.0%
know
100.0%
why
100.0%
the
99.9%
customer
100.0%
hasn't
100.0%
paid,
100.0%
you
99.8%
can't
99.7%
stop
100.0%
it
99.9%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
future
100.0%
from
99.9%
happening.
76.6%
You
99.8%
can't
100.0%
really
99.7%
resolve
100.0%
that.
100.0%
You
99.8%
need
99.9%
someone
100.0%
to
100.0%
look
100.0%
at
100.0%
it,
99.9%
um,
97.2%
and
99.7%
see
100.0%
what
100.0%
sort
91.8%
of
99.8%
has
99.8%
caused
100.0%
the
100.0%
issue.
99.9%
So
96.2%
clearly
100.0%
the
63.6%
system
100.0%
is
100.0%
inefficient
93.7%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
customer.
99.8%
It's
86.3%
also
99.9%
extremely
89.8%
inefficient
90.9%
for
100.0%
postal
100.0%
workers.
99.7%
As
99.8%
a
99.9%
result
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.6%
automatic
100.0%
blocking,
99.9%
their
90.0%
inbox
99.9%
is
77.1%
backlogged
99.3%
with
100.0%
hundreds
99.8%
of
100.0%
emails
100.0%
from
100.0%
customers
99.9%
trying
100.0%
to
100.0%
reinstate
100.0%
their
100.0%
accounts
99.8%
or
99.8%
complaining
99.9%
about
100.0%
an
99.9%
AI
99.7%
caused
99.8%
issue.
98.8%
The
99.3%
work
93.6%
has
57.8%
increased,
100.0%
not
99.3%
decreased.
94.2%
The
99.1%
other
100.0%
people
100.0%
in
94.5%
my
99.9%
team
100.0%
said
99.9%
that
98.3%
they
99.9%
Just
99.3%
don't
94.4%
have
100.0%
the
99.5%
time
100.0%
to
100.0%
assist.
99.9%
They
100.0%
were
99.9%
saying
100.0%
that
98.7%
they
99.9%
log
99.9%
in,
98.5%
they
99.9%
don't
99.9%
take
100.0%
their
100.0%
breaks,
99.9%
they
99.6%
didn't
99.4%
take
99.9%
lunch,
99.9%
and
98.7%
they
99.8%
said
100.0%
they
96.2%
would
99.8%
usually
100.0%
work
100.0%
overtime
99.9%
just
99.9%
to
100.0%
try
99.9%
and
99.8%
meet
100.0%
the
100.0%
new
100.0%
demand.
99.9%
So
95.8%
it's
99.4%
causing
100.0%
more
99.0%
work
100.0%
for
98.9%
my
92.4%
team,
99.9%
which
99.6%
is,
93.7%
I
79.5%
guess,
100.0%
counterintuitive
99.4%
for
100.0%
us.
99.4%
But,
94.4%
uh,
84.2%
they
98.5%
don't
99.7%
see
99.1%
that.
99.6%
So
93.8%
it's
100.0%
not
99.9%
necessarily
88.3%
more
100.0%
efficient
94.5%
for
100.0%
the
100.0%
customer,
100.0%
not
99.6%
more
100.0%
efficient
73.2%
for
100.0%
the
99.6%
workers,
99.9%
at
99.9%
the
99.9%
very
100.0%
least.
100.0%
Is
99.9%
this
99.7%
cost
100.0%
effective?
79.6%
Well,
99.4%
in
100.0%
some
100.0%
regards,
99.6%
no.
97.2%
The
99.9%
company's
93.0%
actively
100.0%
losing
92.9%
customers
100.0%
because
100.0%
the
100.0%
user
100.0%
experience
100.0%
is
99.9%
now
99.9%
so
99.8%
terrible
99.9%
their
99.2%
business
100.0%
is
99.9%
halted.
99.4%
They
99.9%
can't
100.0%
send
100.0%
out
100.0%
their
99.9%
orders.
99.9%
I
77.3%
can't
100.0%
get
100.0%
to
99.9%
them
100.0%
in
100.0%
time.
100.0%
I'm
99.8%
getting
98.3%
about
99.6%
100
70.4%
emails
99.9%
a
99.9%
day
100.0%
that
99.8%
I
99.9%
just
98.7%
can't
99.9%
answer.
97.7%
So
98.1%
it
99.9%
starts
99.9%
backlogging.
99.5%
Customers
99.8%
are
99.6%
leaving,
99.8%
uh,
97.9%
our
99.9%
business
100.0%
and
99.6%
saying,
99.2%
I'm
99.8%
going
76.4%
to
99.8%
go
100.0%
with
100.0%
another
100.0%
provider
100.0%
because
99.9%
my
100.0%
account's
87.0%
been
99.9%
blocked
97.3%
for
99.7%
two
100.0%
weeks.
100.0%
I
99.9%
haven't
99.9%
been
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
send
100.0%
out
99.9%
orders.
100.0%
Which
99.7%
is
100.0%
fair
99.9%
enough.
99.6%
I
75.5%
mean,
99.4%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
think
100.0%
that
98.4%
the
99.7%
corporate
100.0%
overlords
99.7%
wanted
100.0%
every
100.0%
part
99.8%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
postal
98.8%
experience
100.0%
worse
99.9%
for
100.0%
employees
100.0%
and
88.7%
customers
100.0%
alike.
100.0%
But
99.7%
I
99.9%
also
99.9%
think
100.0%
it
99.9%
would
100.0%
have
86.4%
been
100.0%
a
99.9%
much
99.8%
more
100.0%
considered
100.0%
decision
99.9%
to
100.0%
instate
99.4%
this
75.4%
AI
93.2%
if
100.0%
they'd
99.6%
understood
99.9%
the
100.0%
actual
100.0%
value
100.0%
of
100.0%
their
100.0%
employees,
89.7%
the
99.8%
value
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
work
100.0%
that
99.4%
they
100.0%
already
99.9%
do.
99.4%
Something
100.0%
that's
99.7%
really
99.8%
interesting
93.9%
to
99.0%
me
100.0%
is
99.9%
that
99.9%
neither
100.0%
the
99.9%
writers
96.3%
union
99.9%
or
96.1%
the
99.4%
postal
99.0%
workers
99.6%
were
99.9%
apparently
100.0%
consulted
88.3%
about
99.9%
potential
100.0%
ways
100.0%
to
100.0%
work
100.0%
with
99.9%
AI.
99.4%
The
100.0%
WGA
99.9%
doesn't
99.9%
actually
99.4%
support
100.0%
a
99.9%
blanket
100.0%
ban
100.0%
on
100.0%
AI
99.9%
use
99.1%
in
99.2%
screenwriting
97.3%
and
99.8%
has
99.1%
offered
99.9%
studios
99.4%
a
99.9%
proposal
100.0%
for
99.7%
how
100.0%
AI
99.9%
could
97.8%
be
100.0%
incorporated
99.3%
into
99.9%
the
99.9%
screenwriting
92.9%
process
100.0%
in
99.8%
a
100.0%
way
100.0%
that
100.0%
benefits
100.0%
writers,
98.5%
protecting
100.0%
them
100.0%
from
100.0%
economic
100.0%
harm
98.2%
while
99.9%
allowing
94.7%
them
100.0%
to
100.0%
explore
99.9%
the
99.5%
uses
99.3%
of
88.1%
AI
100.0%
within
99.9%
their
100.0%
work
100.0%
on
99.9%
their
99.9%
own
99.9%
terms.
99.9%
So
97.9%
at
100.0%
this
100.0%
point,
100.0%
we've
99.8%
seen
100.0%
flaws
93.8%
in
99.9%
AI
100.0%
in
100.0%
terms
100.0%
of
100.0%
creative
100.0%
jobs,
100.0%
analytical
97.5%
jobs
86.2%
jobs,
98.8%
logic
99.9%
based
100.0%
jobs,
78.0%
customer
99.9%
facing
100.0%
jobs,
99.9%
research
100.0%
jobs.
99.1%
So
98.8%
are,
99.4%
uh,
92.0%
people
100.0%
just
98.9%
overreacting
100.0%
when
99.7%
they
99.6%
worry
100.0%
about
99.9%
AI
100.0%
coming
100.0%
for
99.8%
their
99.6%
jobs?
99.8%
I've
99.8%
seen
100.0%
some
99.3%
people
99.9%
who
99.8%
are
99.6%
involved
98.1%
in
99.8%
the
99.9%
process
100.0%
behind
100.0%
AI
98.7%
suggest
100.0%
that
99.1%
there's
99.5%
nothing
100.0%
to
100.0%
worry
99.2%
about,
98.7%
that
99.0%
not
99.9%
much
100.0%
will
99.9%
change,
100.0%
and
70.6%
that,
98.6%
uh,
95.8%
although
100.0%
AI
99.9%
seems
99.9%
exciting
100.0%
and
94.1%
novel
97.7%
from
99.9%
the
99.8%
outside,
99.9%
it's
99.8%
just
99.7%
another
100.0%
tool
99.9%
because
99.3%
they
99.9%
can
99.5%
see
100.0%
behind
100.0%
the
99.9%
curtain
99.2%
and
62.2%
know
99.9%
the
99.2%
issues
99.8%
that
96.9%
AI
99.9%
still
99.8%
has
99.4%
from
100.0%
a
99.9%
functionality
100.0%
point
99.9%
of
100.0%
view.
99.8%
They
99.8%
understand
99.9%
that
98.9%
this,
97.9%
this
77.7%
isn't
99.9%
a
99.1%
conscious,
85.3%
independently
99.9%
intelligent
100.0%
being.
99.8%
And
99.3%
so
90.3%
they
95.8%
dismiss,
91.8%
sometimes
98.9%
mock
97.3%
those
99.7%
that
98.9%
worry
100.0%
about
99.9%
their
99.2%
job
100.0%
security
100.0%
or
99.9%
predict
89.7%
grand,
97.9%
sweeping
89.0%
social
99.9%
changes
99.8%
from
99.7%
this
99.5%
new
99.7%
technology.
99.9%
But
99.5%
here's
90.1%
the
98.9%
thing.
53.0%
The
98.7%
More
100.0%
I've
97.7%
been
99.7%
researching
78.1%
this
99.6%
topic,
99.9%
the
100.0%
more
100.0%
that
88.0%
that
91.5%
sounds
100.0%
like
99.7%
every
99.9%
expert
99.9%
in
99.9%
2016
100.0%
telling
99.6%
us
100.0%
that
97.3%
Trump
100.0%
could
98.7%
never
99.9%
be
99.9%
elected.
99.8%
Because
99.6%
it
99.8%
isn't
99.9%
about
99.9%
the
99.3%
technicalities
99.9%
or
99.8%
even
99.5%
the
98.9%
reality
99.9%
behind
100.0%
them.
99.0%
It's
99.8%
about
100.0%
people.
99.9%
And
99.0%
sometimes
90.4%
people
100.0%
are
99.9%
the
99.6%
worst.
99.0%
First,
79.5%
the
98.6%
AI
99.6%
developer.
99.6%
Uh,
97.9%
I
99.3%
think
100.0%
there's
99.5%
been
99.9%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
misconceptions
100.0%
from
100.0%
those
99.6%
people
100.0%
at
96.3%
the
74.3%
top
100.0%
as
98.3%
to
100.0%
what
99.9%
exactly
91.0%
it
99.8%
can
100.0%
do,
99.9%
which
99.8%
is
100.0%
interesting
100.0%
sitting
100.0%
here.
100.0%
As
93.7%
someone
99.9%
who's
99.5%
worked
99.9%
in
100.0%
that
100.0%
space
100.0%
and
67.9%
has
99.9%
tried
100.0%
to
100.0%
build
100.0%
practical
100.0%
tools
100.0%
using
100.0%
these
99.9%
technologies.
99.9%
I
99.1%
think
100.0%
a
100.0%
big
100.0%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
all
99.8%
of
81.4%
this
75.3%
stuff
91.9%
is
99.6%
it's
99.6%
never
100.0%
going
84.5%
to
99.9%
be
99.8%
equal
100.0%
to
100.0%
what
99.9%
a
94.2%
human
97.9%
can
84.6%
do.
98.9%
A
99.1%
human
100.0%
will
100.0%
always
100.0%
be
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
read
100.0%
through
99.8%
something
100.0%
and
99.8%
recognize
99.5%
in
98.9%
ways
100.0%
that
98.1%
the
95.4%
computers
94.0%
won't
99.7%
be
99.9%
able
100.0%
to.
98.7%
That
99.8%
was
99.8%
Gabe,
99.5%
an
99.5%
AI
99.9%
developer,
100.0%
uh,
77.0%
who
100.0%
spoke
100.0%
to
100.0%
me
100.0%
earlier
100.0%
this
100.0%
month.
98.2%
We
99.9%
talked
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.9%
limits
100.0%
of
100.0%
artificial
99.3%
intelligence
97.3%
that
99.7%
he
100.0%
jokingly
96.3%
referred
99.9%
to
100.0%
as
99.5%
artificial
98.6%
stupidity.
100.0%
But
99.7%
I
99.8%
also
99.9%
wanted
99.9%
to
99.9%
ask
100.0%
someone
100.0%
within
99.6%
the
99.9%
industry
100.0%
about
99.9%
my
100.0%
feelings
77.9%
that
99.8%
the
99.9%
limits
100.0%
of
99.9%
AI
99.9%
won't
99.9%
actually
99.4%
make
100.0%
much
99.5%
of
99.3%
a
100.0%
difference
100.0%
if
100.0%
those
100.0%
in
99.8%
power
100.0%
decide
100.0%
that
97.9%
it's
99.3%
good
99.9%
enough
100.0%
for
100.0%
their
99.8%
purposes.
99.9%
He
100.0%
suggested
100.0%
that
99.8%
right
99.8%
now,
100.0%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
of
99.9%
them
100.0%
don't
99.9%
seem
100.0%
to
99.2%
be
99.8%
ready
100.0%
to
100.0%
acknowledge
94.5%
the
99.7%
limitations
99.8%
at
94.6%
all.
100.0%
But
99.7%
even
100.0%
if
100.0%
they
100.0%
did,
100.0%
I'm
88.3%
not
100.0%
convinced
95.9%
that
97.8%
much
100.0%
would
99.9%
change,
100.0%
because
99.9%
it's
98.3%
all
99.9%
well
99.8%
and
99.9%
good
100.0%
telling
90.9%
them
89.3%
this
99.6%
is
99.8%
just
99.9%
a
99.8%
language
100.0%
prediction
99.9%
model.
99.8%
It's
99.7%
not
99.8%
really
100.0%
intelligent.
93.3%
Because
99.8%
if
100.0%
the
100.0%
average
100.0%
person,
100.0%
especially
100.0%
the
100.0%
average
100.0%
person
100.0%
in
100.0%
business
100.0%
leadership
100.0%
making
100.0%
decisions
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
100.0%
human
100.0%
workforce
100.0%
thinks
99.9%
it
99.9%
does
99.9%
a
99.9%
good
100.0%
enough
100.0%
job,
100.0%
then
99.6%
they
99.9%
might
99.9%
not
100.0%
care
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.7%
flaws
99.8%
if
100.0%
it
99.9%
saves
100.0%
them
88.4%
money
100.0%
or
65.1%
increases
100.0%
profit.
99.9%
I
99.5%
mean.
100.0%
One
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
world's
99.9%
leading
100.0%
AI
99.7%
data
100.0%
scientists,
98.3%
Geoffrey
97.4%
Hinton,
100.0%
recently
100.0%
quit
100.0%
his
100.0%
job
100.0%
so
100.0%
he
99.4%
could
99.5%
talk
99.9%
about
100.0%
the
100.0%
dangers
100.0%
of
100.0%
AI
100.0%
without
100.0%
considering
100.0%
how
100.0%
this
100.0%
impacts
100.0%
Google,
100.0%
and
99.7%
confess
100.0%
that
99.9%
a
99.7%
part
100.0%
of
100.0%
him
100.0%
now
99.8%
regrets
100.0%
his
100.0%
life's
99.9%
work
100.0%
due
100.0%
to
100.0%
his
99.9%
growing
99.9%
concerns.
99.8%
AI
99.9%
ethics
100.0%
and
99.0%
progress
99.9%
and
99.8%
safeguarding
99.8%
are
99.9%
so
99.8%
clearly
100.0%
wrapped
99.9%
up
99.8%
with
99.3%
the
100.0%
power
100.0%
of
100.0%
huge
100.0%
business
100.0%
owners
100.0%
and
99.8%
CEOs,
93.1%
and
99.6%
that,
100.0%
um,
98.5%
doesn't
100.0%
seem
100.0%
great
100.0%
to
99.9%
me.
99.8%
So
99.2%
during
100.0%
our
99.9%
interview,
100.0%
I
100.0%
checked
100.0%
in
99.9%
on
100.0%
a
100.0%
bunch
100.0%
of
100.0%
things
100.0%
that
99.1%
I'd
99.4%
seen
99.8%
reported
99.9%
on
99.9%
when
100.0%
it
100.0%
comes
99.4%
to
100.0%
AI,
99.9%
and
99.8%
he
99.8%
confirmed
99.6%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
what
100.0%
I've
99.6%
already
99.9%
talked
100.0%
about
100.0%
in
99.9%
this
99.9%
video,
99.7%
giving
99.7%
some
99.9%
more
99.6%
details.
67.5%
Detail.
98.1%
Take
100.0%
the
100.0%
data
99.8%
I
99.9%
was
100.0%
worried
100.0%
about
100.0%
being
100.0%
flawed
97.7%
or
99.9%
biased,
99.3%
for
99.7%
example,
99.8%
he
99.7%
broke
99.9%
it
100.0%
down
100.0%
further.
79.5%
There
99.7%
are
98.8%
sort
98.9%
of
99.8%
two
99.9%
main
100.0%
types
78.1%
of
100.0%
training
98.8%
that
96.2%
can
99.9%
happen.
98.8%
There's
98.6%
supervised
98.9%
training,
100.0%
which
100.0%
is
100.0%
to
100.0%
say
100.0%
that
99.9%
you
99.9%
have
100.0%
people
100.0%
who
100.0%
create
100.0%
training
99.8%
sets
99.6%
and
88.0%
code
87.3%
them
99.9%
to
100.0%
feed
100.0%
into
99.9%
the
96.2%
machines
99.7%
which
99.7%
tends
99.5%
to
99.9%
be
100.0%
very
100.0%
expensive.
100.0%
And
98.6%
then
99.4%
there's
100.0%
unsupervised
100.0%
where
99.7%
you
100.0%
just
100.0%
throw
100.0%
in
99.7%
everything
99.9%
you
100.0%
can
99.2%
find
99.9%
and
97.7%
let
99.7%
the
97.6%
machine
99.9%
sort
95.1%
it
87.2%
out
99.9%
itself.
99.9%
Using
99.9%
ChatGPT,
89.9%
they
99.0%
started
100.0%
with
99.9%
unsupervised
99.8%
by
99.7%
essentially
99.9%
scraping
100.0%
the
99.9%
Internet.
97.3%
Um,
97.9%
as
99.3%
of
97.6%
I
99.8%
think
100.0%
it
99.0%
was
99.9%
September
100.0%
21,
99.7%
2021
99.7%
was
99.9%
their
97.9%
cutoff
98.7%
date.
99.8%
So
98.9%
anything
100.0%
that's
99.9%
happened
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
Internet
100.0%
since
100.0%
that
99.9%
date
99.8%
m
49.5%
it
97.0%
will
99.8%
say
99.8%
I
59.2%
I
100.0%
don't
100.0%
know.
100.0%
That's
99.5%
when
68.4%
when
99.9%
my
99.9%
training
100.0%
ended.
99.9%
And
99.6%
then
99.9%
they
99.9%
hired
94.9%
a
99.9%
large
100.0%
number
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
in
99.8%
low
100.0%
wage
95.1%
countries
99.9%
to
99.5%
essentially
99.8%
when
100.0%
the
100.0%
machine
99.7%
started
100.0%
spitting
95.0%
out
100.0%
gibberish,
92.0%
tell
99.9%
the
99.6%
machine
100.0%
that
99.4%
that
99.5%
was
99.9%
what
100.0%
it
100.0%
was
100.0%
doing
99.5%
and
99.7%
to
100.0%
help
100.0%
identify
100.0%
what
100.0%
the
100.0%
good
100.0%
results
100.0%
were
100.0%
from
98.1%
the
76.6%
bad
99.7%
results.
98.5%
And
98.1%
that
99.9%
data
100.0%
set
87.8%
I
87.2%
this
97.9%
is.
100.0%
There
99.6%
are
97.9%
any
100.0%
number
99.9%
of
99.7%
stories
97.8%
of
77.3%
horror
91.1%
stories
86.5%
really
97.7%
of
99.8%
what
100.0%
happens
100.0%
when
100.0%
you
100.0%
just
99.8%
do
100.0%
unsupervised
100.0%
training.
99.9%
You're
91.7%
going
52.9%
to
99.8%
get
100.0%
all
100.0%
of
99.8%
the
100.0%
biases
99.9%
that
100.0%
exist
100.0%
in
100.0%
our
100.0%
society
100.0%
and
99.9%
exist
99.8%
in
99.5%
the
100.0%
training
99.3%
data
99.8%
you
98.5%
put
100.0%
in.
99.8%
And
89.3%
one
99.9%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
things
100.0%
that
99.7%
these
99.9%
systems
100.0%
do
100.0%
is
88.0%
is
100.0%
they
99.9%
tend
99.5%
to
90.4%
find
99.7%
local
100.0%
maximum
93.1%
um
99.3%
so
93.3%
a
99.9%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
times
100.0%
they
100.0%
will
99.9%
actually
99.6%
accentuate
89.0%
those
99.9%
biases
99.9%
because
92.0%
they'll
90.5%
find
99.9%
small
100.0%
things
99.9%
and
94.7%
mass
45.8%
magnify
83.7%
them.
95.8%
So
98.5%
we
99.9%
have
100.0%
a
99.8%
process
100.0%
that
99.8%
it
98.8%
turns
100.0%
out
100.0%
has
100.0%
a
99.7%
massive
100.0%
environmental
100.0%
impact,
100.0%
utilizes
88.7%
underpaid
100.0%
workers
99.8%
in
98.2%
developing
100.0%
nations
100.0%
and
67.9%
may
99.9%
well
99.6%
indeed
96.4%
be
100.0%
magnified
90.9%
in
98.3%
biases
99.7%
like
99.0%
even
100.0%
the
100.0%
fact
100.0%
it's
97.8%
scraping
99.4%
some
99.9%
of
99.7%
these
99.6%
particular
100.0%
places
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
100.0%
Internet.
99.9%
It
99.9%
will
91.4%
most
100.0%
likely
100.0%
be
100.0%
focusing
100.0%
on
100.0%
predominantly
99.9%
western
100.0%
English
100.0%
speaking
99.7%
sources
100.0%
and
99.3%
that
99.9%
itself
100.0%
will
99.9%
have
100.0%
an
99.9%
effect
99.2%
on
99.9%
what
100.0%
is
99.5%
produced.
81.1%
And
98.9%
that's
99.9%
not
100.0%
even
100.0%
getting
99.4%
into
99.1%
data
100.0%
laundering
99.3%
and
59.1%
alleged
100.0%
stealing
99.1%
of
99.9%
artists
99.4%
and
99.8%
writers
95.6%
work
99.9%
to
100.0%
train
100.0%
various
100.0%
AI
99.8%
that
94.9%
been
99.0%
cropping
100.0%
up
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
last
100.0%
few
100.0%
weeks
100.0%
and
56.2%
months
100.0%
alone.
100.0%
Gabe
98.5%
also
99.9%
wanted
100.0%
to
100.0%
mention
87.4%
something
100.0%
else
96.2%
key
98.8%
limitation
95.4%
particularly
99.6%
for
99.6%
GPT4
98.4%
and
77.4%
that
85.4%
and
97.4%
ChatGPT
94.1%
is
99.7%
around
99.9%
context
99.9%
and
99.6%
truth.
82.3%
The
99.9%
model
100.0%
is
100.0%
looking
100.0%
for
100.0%
words
100.0%
in
99.2%
order
100.0%
that
99.5%
it's
99.3%
seen
99.8%
words
100.0%
before
100.0%
and
70.6%
words
99.9%
near
99.7%
words
100.0%
that
98.7%
it's
85.7%
seen
99.3%
words
99.9%
before.
100.0%
You
99.9%
can
100.0%
change
100.0%
the
56.2%
meaning
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
sentence
100.0%
very
100.0%
easily
100.0%
by
100.0%
putting
100.0%
the
100.0%
word
99.9%
not
99.6%
into
94.4%
there.
98.9%
And
98.4%
GPT4
99.6%
isn't
100.0%
going
84.3%
to
99.9%
have
100.0%
that
100.0%
context
89.3%
to
97.7%
be
100.0%
able
100.0%
to
99.9%
do
99.9%
that.
99.8%
They
99.9%
lack
99.8%
context
83.2%
and
95.1%
they
98.8%
lack
100.0%
that
99.7%
ability
100.0%
to
100.0%
actually
99.3%
understand
99.9%
what
99.9%
they're
99.8%
generating.
99.0%
We
99.5%
as
99.8%
humans
100.0%
like
99.8%
to
99.6%
anthropomorphise
79.5%
things.
99.3%
We
100.0%
gasp
98.9%
in
99.9%
horror
100.0%
when
99.9%
someone
99.8%
kicks
84.4%
a
99.2%
robot
99.8%
dog,
100.0%
we
99.6%
say
99.9%
thank
99.6%
you
99.6%
to
99.8%
our
99.9%
Alexas.
94.6%
And
98.8%
so
99.9%
it
99.9%
feels
99.9%
like
95.8%
second
100.0%
nature
100.0%
to
99.6%
see
99.9%
what
99.9%
seems
99.9%
to
99.8%
be
99.9%
an
97.9%
independent
99.9%
intelligence
95.5%
carrying
100.0%
out
99.5%
a
99.8%
task
100.0%
and
99.8%
think
100.0%
of
99.9%
it
99.9%
as
99.3%
alive
99.9%
in
99.9%
some
100.0%
way.
99.9%
It's
99.6%
difficult
100.0%
to
100.0%
remember
99.2%
that
99.7%
it
99.9%
doesn't
99.9%
have
100.0%
critical
100.0%
thought,
98.1%
it
99.7%
doesn't
99.9%
understand
100.0%
in
98.4%
the
97.7%
way
96.5%
that
99.7%
we
100.0%
do.
99.8%
One
99.9%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
most
100.0%
interesting
90.8%
points
100.0%
Gabe
88.0%
mentioned
100.0%
during
100.0%
our
100.0%
discussion
100.0%
was
99.8%
the
100.0%
way
100.0%
AI
99.2%
might
100.0%
shape
100.0%
the
100.0%
future
100.0%
of
100.0%
software
99.9%
development
100.0%
as
99.9%
a
100.0%
job
99.9%
itself
97.9%
does
99.7%
remove
78.1%
the
100.0%
jobs
99.9%
of
100.0%
low
100.0%
level
100.0%
software
99.7%
developers.
99.7%
How
99.4%
you
99.8%
move
100.0%
from
100.0%
being
100.0%
junior
100.0%
to
99.9%
being
99.9%
senior
91.7%
is
99.8%
by
100.0%
doing
100.0%
all
100.0%
of
99.8%
this
99.6%
grunt
70.5%
work.
99.9%
And
98.9%
these
99.3%
systems
100.0%
are
100.0%
taking
100.0%
advantage
97.2%
of
99.6%
the
100.0%
community
100.0%
that
100.0%
was
100.0%
created
100.0%
to
100.0%
help
100.0%
people
100.0%
learn,
100.0%
to
99.9%
help
100.0%
people
99.9%
grow,
99.9%
and
99.7%
using
100.0%
that
99.9%
to
99.9%
automate
99.9%
a
49.5%
way
98.0%
that
96.5%
path
82.4%
up.
99.7%
I
98.6%
think
100.0%
the
99.7%
people
100.0%
who
99.9%
are
100.0%
using
100.0%
those
99.8%
don't
100.0%
care
100.0%
because
99.9%
again,
99.6%
it's
100.0%
about
99.2%
how
100.0%
can
99.9%
I
100.0%
cut
100.0%
my
100.0%
development
100.0%
budget
99.9%
by
100.0%
30%?
96.9%
By
100.0%
cutting
100.0%
out
100.0%
all
100.0%
the
99.9%
junior
100.0%
devs,
98.9%
you
99.6%
end
100.0%
up
100.0%
with
100.0%
a
100.0%
lot
100.0%
less
100.0%
flexibility
100.0%
because
99.8%
even
99.8%
a
99.3%
junior
100.0%
dev
98.5%
can
100.0%
have
99.9%
a
99.9%
really
100.0%
good
100.0%
idea
100.0%
that
99.8%
someone
99.9%
who's
99.3%
more
99.3%
senior
100.0%
can
99.4%
say,
99.1%
oh
99.2%
well,
99.7%
if
100.0%
we
100.0%
did
96.4%
it
99.6%
like
99.8%
that,
99.8%
and
99.2%
the
100.0%
machine's
97.5%
never
100.0%
going
80.8%
to
100.0%
come
100.0%
up
100.0%
with
100.0%
that.
99.6%
I
99.6%
do
100.0%
suspect
100.0%
that
99.6%
in
100.0%
20
100.0%
or
99.9%
30
100.0%
years
100.0%
it's
100.0%
going
97.5%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.9%
real
100.0%
problem
100.0%
of
99.6%
a
99.9%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
99.9%
who
99.9%
are
99.8%
able
100.0%
to
85.2%
get
99.9%
the
99.9%
basic
99.7%
it's
95.9%
the
93.7%
entry
100.0%
level
100.0%
job,
100.0%
10
100.0%
years
99.7%
experience
100.0%
required.
99.5%
I
99.8%
can
100.0%
get
100.0%
it
100.0%
to
99.9%
work,
100.0%
but
99.9%
when
100.0%
something
100.0%
goes
100.0%
wrong,
100.0%
I
99.9%
have
99.9%
no
100.0%
idea
100.0%
how
100.0%
to
99.9%
fix
100.0%
it.
99.5%
The
99.8%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
in
99.9%
positions
100.0%
of
100.0%
power
100.0%
knowing
100.0%
how
100.0%
AI
99.9%
works,
98.1%
what
99.8%
its
99.0%
limitations
100.0%
are,
99.7%
surely
100.0%
can
99.8%
only
100.0%
be
100.0%
exacerbated
99.2%
if
100.0%
those
100.0%
working
100.0%
on
100.0%
it
100.0%
from
100.0%
the
99.6%
ground
100.0%
up
100.0%
lack
99.9%
the
99.9%
totality
100.0%
of
100.0%
that
99.7%
knowledge
99.9%
too.
99.5%
And
99.5%
it's
99.3%
starting
92.6%
way
99.5%
before
100.0%
we
99.9%
enter
100.0%
the
100.0%
workforce.
99.4%
The
92.4%
Teacher
99.1%
Ever
100.0%
since
100.0%
the
99.9%
latest
99.8%
iteration
100.0%
of
99.9%
ChatGPT
93.8%
launched,
99.4%
there
100.0%
have
99.5%
been
100.0%
wide
99.8%
reports
100.0%
of
100.0%
students
100.0%
using
100.0%
it
100.0%
for
100.0%
homework,
100.0%
particularly
99.9%
essay
100.0%
writing.
100.0%
And
98.1%
so
99.9%
I
99.9%
sat
100.0%
down
99.9%
with
100.0%
a
99.5%
high
100.0%
school
99.9%
teacher
100.0%
to
100.0%
hear
100.0%
about
99.7%
about
54.6%
how
99.9%
AI
99.9%
has
99.8%
changed
100.0%
their
99.8%
classroom
98.0%
experience.
99.2%
Pretty
100.0%
quickly
100.0%
it
99.9%
became
79.6%
clear
100.0%
that
99.6%
the
100.0%
reason
100.0%
AI
93.9%
is
100.0%
spreading
100.0%
like
99.8%
wildfire
100.0%
among
99.9%
students
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
just
100.0%
because
100.0%
of
100.0%
academic
100.0%
laziness.
99.8%
The
99.9%
teaching
100.0%
landscape
95.1%
and
99.9%
the
99.5%
overall
100.0%
mood
100.0%
of
99.9%
students
99.9%
has
98.0%
drastically
100.0%
shifted,
100.0%
especially
99.9%
during
100.0%
the
99.8%
pandemic.
100.0%
Students
100.0%
who
99.9%
had
99.4%
not
99.6%
struggled
99.9%
before
100.0%
struggled
89.7%
a
99.5%
lot
100.0%
harder
100.0%
because
100.0%
of
100.0%
lockdown
100.0%
and
99.8%
different
100.0%
forms
100.0%
of
100.0%
learning.
99.9%
It's
99.9%
not
100.0%
that
99.8%
they
99.9%
don't
99.9%
care
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.8%
future,
96.8%
a
99.6%
lot
100.0%
of
100.0%
them
100.0%
just
99.7%
don't
99.9%
think
99.9%
they
99.9%
have
99.9%
one.
99.7%
It's
98.6%
really
99.8%
impacting
81.1%
learning
98.7%
and
85.2%
their
99.9%
entire
100.0%
outlook.
99.9%
Like,
96.2%
do
100.0%
I
99.9%
even
99.7%
need
100.0%
this?
100.0%
The
99.9%
world's
99.1%
burning
90.8%
away.
99.9%
Especially
99.7%
the
99.8%
smarter
99.9%
students
100.0%
who
99.8%
know
100.0%
what
99.7%
the
99.9%
political
100.0%
landscape
100.0%
is
99.6%
right
99.7%
now.
73.0%
Climate
100.0%
change.
100.0%
The
99.8%
pandemic
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
over
99.9%
all
94.6%
of
99.8%
that.
99.9%
There
99.7%
is
98.5%
a
99.2%
hopelessness
100.0%
there
99.5%
that
100.0%
really
99.7%
feeds
100.0%
into
100.0%
the
99.0%
lack
99.9%
of
100.0%
motivation.
100.0%
And
97.6%
I'VE
98.9%
spoken
87.6%
to
99.9%
colleagues
100.0%
about
99.9%
this
99.9%
and
99.7%
we
99.8%
just
99.8%
don't
100.0%
know
100.0%
how
100.0%
to
100.0%
fix
100.0%
it
99.9%
because
99.5%
it's
99.8%
not
100.0%
like
99.9%
you
99.9%
can
99.6%
just
99.2%
tell
100.0%
them
99.4%
it's
99.3%
all
99.7%
gonna
88.2%
be
100.0%
alright.
87.1%
They're
92.7%
too
100.0%
smart
100.0%
to
99.8%
just
99.9%
believe
100.0%
that.
99.7%
The
99.9%
US
94.2%
Surgeon
100.0%
General
100.0%
has
99.9%
said
100.0%
that
99.0%
the
99.7%
youth
100.0%
mental
100.0%
health
100.0%
crisis
100.0%
is
99.9%
the
99.9%
defining
100.0%
public
100.0%
health
100.0%
crisis
100.0%
of
100.0%
our
100.0%
time.
100.0%
And
99.3%
that
99.9%
is
99.8%
in
99.7%
2023,
99.8%
you
94.1%
know,
99.1%
after
100.0%
the
100.0%
start
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
pandemic.
100.0%
And
99.1%
yeah,
99.7%
the
99.7%
data
100.0%
is
99.9%
really
99.8%
worrying.
99.8%
The
99.9%
most
100.0%
recent
100.0%
results
100.0%
for
99.5%
the
100.0%
Centre
57.7%
of
97.9%
Disease
100.0%
Control
100.0%
and
99.5%
Prevention's
98.9%
Youth
100.0%
Risk
100.0%
Behavior
84.7%
Survey
93.1%
show
100.0%
an
99.9%
increase
100.0%
in
100.0%
self
100.0%
reported
100.0%
mental
100.0%
health
100.0%
challenges,
93.3%
most
100.0%
notably
100.0%
amongst
98.7%
girls
100.0%
and
99.8%
those
99.8%
who
94.5%
identify
97.9%
as
93.3%
LGBTQ.
98.1%
In
100.0%
2021,
99.9%
for
99.9%
example,
99.9%
42%
98.6%
of
100.0%
high
100.0%
school
99.9%
students
100.0%
said
99.9%
they
99.8%
experienced
88.5%
persistent
100.0%
feelings
81.1%
of
100.0%
sadness
100.0%
or
99.9%
hopelessness
100.0%
during
100.0%
the
100.0%
past
99.9%
year.
99.9%
This
100.0%
was
100.0%
a
99.9%
13.5%
97.4%
increase
100.0%
from
99.9%
2019
100.0%
and
62.3%
a
99.8%
50%
92.0%
increase
100.0%
from
99.9%
2011.
99.9%
The
99.9%
teacher
99.9%
I
99.9%
spoke
100.0%
to
100.0%
sees
99.8%
this
99.7%
in
100.0%
the
99.7%
classroom
95.3%
constantly.
99.6%
Behavior
87.4%
management
100.0%
has
99.9%
always
100.0%
been
100.0%
a
99.4%
part
99.9%
of
99.7%
teachers
99.0%
jobs,
100.0%
but
100.0%
their
99.9%
day
100.0%
to
100.0%
day
100.0%
experience
99.9%
seemed
99.8%
almost
100.0%
more
100.0%
in
100.0%
line
100.0%
with
100.0%
what
100.0%
a
100.0%
therapist
96.4%
would
99.9%
be
99.9%
doing,
99.3%
not
99.3%
an
99.9%
educator.
85.2%
In
99.7%
recent
100.0%
years
99.7%
the
97.9%
mental
100.0%
health
100.0%
issues
99.9%
of
99.9%
our
100.0%
students
100.0%
have
100.0%
statistically
100.0%
risen
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
99.7%
point
100.0%
where
99.7%
it
99.9%
is
99.4%
genuinely
98.8%
scary.
99.9%
The
100.0%
youngest
100.0%
kids
99.8%
I
99.5%
teach
100.0%
are
96.0%
12
100.0%
years
99.8%
old
100.0%
and
99.6%
in
98.9%
my
99.9%
seventh
100.0%
grade.
100.0%
So
97.9%
a
94.0%
uh,
92.4%
12
100.0%
year
100.0%
old
100.0%
had
69.9%
just
98.5%
a
78.6%
uh,
89.2%
it
97.7%
was
100.0%
so
100.0%
scary,
99.9%
like
97.0%
an
99.7%
anxiety
97.4%
attack
99.9%
in
99.8%
the
99.9%
middle
100.0%
of
99.8%
class.
100.0%
It's
82.3%
to
89.5%
a
97.6%
point
99.4%
where
99.3%
it's
99.3%
horrible.
86.7%
Um,
99.8%
and
97.6%
like
92.4%
after
100.0%
that
99.9%
class
100.0%
I
99.9%
just
99.7%
went
99.9%
into
99.5%
this
97.6%
teacher's
96.0%
lounge
100.0%
and
100.0%
cried.
99.9%
In
98.0%
short,
99.3%
the
99.9%
kids
100.0%
are
99.9%
not
99.9%
alright.
75.7%
They're
99.3%
struggling
100.0%
with
99.9%
their
99.1%
mental
100.0%
health
99.4%
health
51.0%
and
99.9%
they
99.5%
most
99.9%
likely
100.0%
aren't
98.2%
able
100.0%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
the
100.0%
support
100.0%
they
100.0%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
process
100.0%
it.
99.3%
Enter
98.7%
ChatGPT,
98.5%
an
99.1%
AI
100.0%
that
99.7%
offers
100.0%
to
99.8%
make
100.0%
just
99.8%
one
100.0%
bit
100.0%
of
99.8%
their
99.9%
life
99.5%
a
99.8%
little
99.7%
bit
99.8%
easier.
99.6%
Of
99.9%
course
100.0%
they're
99.8%
going
99.9%
to
100.0%
use
100.0%
it.
99.8%
Uh,
92.9%
and
99.1%
ironically
100.0%
AI
99.9%
itself
100.0%
might
99.9%
be
100.0%
contributing
100.0%
to
100.0%
students
97.2%
mental
100.0%
health
100.0%
struggles
98.6%
which
99.9%
then
99.8%
leads
99.4%
them
100.0%
to
100.0%
use
99.5%
AI
99.7%
to
100.0%
cheat
100.0%
in
99.9%
this
99.9%
vicious
91.4%
cycle.
100.0%
I
99.5%
think
100.0%
especially
100.0%
students
100.0%
who
100.0%
used
99.9%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
really
100.0%
interested
100.0%
in
100.0%
English
100.0%
because
99.8%
they
99.8%
wanted
100.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
something
100.0%
with
99.8%
that
99.9%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
future.
99.8%
Whether
99.9%
it
100.0%
was
99.9%
like,
85.2%
like
83.5%
oh,
98.8%
I
100.0%
want
99.8%
to
100.0%
study
100.0%
this
99.6%
at
99.9%
uh
98.4%
university
100.0%
or
99.4%
I
99.5%
want
99.9%
to
100.0%
become
99.5%
a
100.0%
writer
100.0%
or
99.8%
a
98.6%
translator.
99.9%
But
99.3%
now
100.0%
with
99.8%
AI,
98.1%
that
99.6%
also
99.8%
just
99.7%
feels
100.0%
like
99.9%
it
99.9%
might
99.8%
be
99.9%
impossible
100.0%
or
99.8%
harder
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
future.
99.9%
Like
94.0%
even
100.0%
if
100.0%
I'm
99.5%
interested
100.0%
in
99.8%
it,
99.9%
I
99.9%
can't
83.1%
do
100.0%
anything
100.0%
with
99.9%
it.
99.4%
For
99.2%
students,
99.9%
AI
91.9%
as
73.2%
it
66.5%
currently
100.0%
exists,
81.0%
with
99.1%
the
96.5%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
understanding
100.0%
of
99.8%
its
99.8%
limitations,
87.4%
the
99.8%
uncertainty
94.1%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
job
100.0%
market
100.0%
and
99.8%
the
99.4%
ease
98.3%
of
100.0%
access
100.0%
and
99.5%
use
99.5%
is
88.7%
both
99.9%
the
97.3%
problem
100.0%
and
67.9%
the
99.3%
solution.
99.0%
Obviously
99.9%
this
99.8%
Kind
93.2%
of
100.0%
academic
89.8%
engagement
100.0%
with
99.9%
AI
100.0%
is
100.0%
harmful
100.0%
to
100.0%
education.
96.4%
For
96.7%
one,
99.3%
AI
99.7%
is
99.4%
notoriously
100.0%
inaccurate.
93.0%
ChatGPT
89.1%
is
99.8%
not
99.6%
fact
99.4%
checked,
99.7%
it
99.2%
frequently
100.0%
generates
100.0%
misinformation,
92.1%
and
99.0%
students
100.0%
using
100.0%
it
99.1%
are
97.9%
not
99.8%
learning
99.9%
to
99.9%
build
100.0%
skills
99.9%
of
99.6%
analysis,
100.0%
understanding
100.0%
and
98.5%
original
100.0%
idea
99.9%
generation
100.0%
and
99.6%
interrogation.
93.8%
What's
99.7%
getting
99.8%
lost
100.0%
is
99.9%
the
99.9%
ability
100.0%
to
99.8%
first
99.3%
of
99.9%
all
99.8%
read
100.0%
longer
100.0%
texts
100.0%
and
99.7%
then
99.2%
read
100.0%
them
99.9%
with
99.9%
a
99.7%
lot
100.0%
more
100.0%
nuance
98.4%
and
98.5%
reading
99.9%
between
100.0%
the
99.6%
lines,
100.0%
especially
100.0%
with
99.8%
like,
77.7%
historical
100.0%
sources
99.8%
analyzing
90.4%
the
100.0%
biases
99.9%
behind
99.9%
political
99.9%
speech,
100.0%
for
99.2%
example.
99.8%
That's
99.9%
where
99.9%
it
100.0%
gets
100.0%
really
99.7%
tricky,
99.8%
because
99.7%
they
99.9%
can
99.9%
tell
100.0%
me,
97.4%
okay,
97.2%
yeah,
97.6%
AI
99.8%
says
99.8%
it's
99.3%
biased,
98.7%
but
99.9%
they
99.9%
don't
100.0%
understand
100.0%
themselves
100.0%
why.
99.7%
I
99.6%
think
100.0%
the
99.9%
problem
100.0%
would
99.8%
be
99.9%
the
99.8%
gap
100.0%
between
100.0%
having
99.9%
the
99.2%
students
99.8%
voice
100.0%
their
99.9%
own
99.8%
opinions
100.0%
and
73.1%
actually
99.8%
having
99.7%
the
99.9%
skill
99.6%
set
95.5%
to
99.9%
do
100.0%
that
99.9%
in
99.0%
a
99.9%
nuanced
100.0%
way.
99.9%
Because
99.8%
if
100.0%
they
100.0%
rely
99.9%
too
100.0%
much
100.0%
on
100.0%
AI
78.0%
to
100.0%
do
100.0%
all
100.0%
of
99.5%
their
100.0%
writing,
100.0%
they
100.0%
can't
100.0%
hone
97.9%
their
100.0%
own
99.7%
writing
99.8%
skills.
91.0%
And
98.9%
then
99.9%
there's
99.9%
kind
97.2%
of
99.8%
like
94.0%
the
99.7%
missing
100.0%
chunk
97.7%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
actual
100.0%
skill
100.0%
set,
99.0%
which,
99.8%
yeah,
99.6%
I
99.7%
am
99.3%
a
99.8%
bit
100.0%
worried
91.8%
about.
99.6%
AI
99.0%
is
95.2%
developing
100.0%
faster
100.0%
and
99.9%
faster.
99.5%
Teachers
100.0%
and
100.0%
educators
100.0%
are
99.8%
stretched
93.2%
extremely
100.0%
thin.
99.3%
They've
98.0%
barely
100.0%
enough
100.0%
resources
100.0%
to
100.0%
handle
100.0%
a
99.4%
non
99.9%
AI,
99.6%
non
100.0%
post
100.0%
pandemic
100.0%
year,
99.9%
let
100.0%
alone
100.0%
this
99.8%
new
100.0%
technology
100.0%
without
99.8%
any,
53.9%
any
96.7%
guidance
100.0%
or
99.8%
support.
100.0%
So
97.7%
what
99.9%
does
99.9%
this
97.5%
all
98.7%
add
100.0%
up
99.8%
to?
99.8%
Well,
98.9%
a
99.9%
whole
99.7%
lot
99.9%
of
99.9%
questions.
99.3%
The
100.0%
future
100.0%
of
100.0%
work
100.0%
and
97.3%
the
99.6%
incoming
79.6%
workforce
100.0%
doesn't
100.0%
seem
100.0%
entirely
91.8%
certain.
93.2%
It's
99.6%
littered
98.9%
with
100.0%
concerns
100.0%
about
100.0%
regulations,
97.2%
support
100.0%
and
83.5%
training,
100.0%
even
100.0%
when
100.0%
industries
86.5%
are
100.0%
committed
99.9%
to
100.0%
using
100.0%
it
100.0%
only
99.8%
as
100.0%
a
100.0%
tool
100.0%
and
99.6%
not
100.0%
to
98.9%
replace
100.0%
workers.
100.0%
But
99.3%
surely
99.8%
I
99.9%
can
99.8%
answer
100.0%
one
99.8%
final
99.9%
question.
77.7%
Could
99.8%
AI
99.8%
do
100.0%
my
100.0%
job?
100.0%
I
99.9%
don't
99.6%
know.
99.5%
You
99.7%
tell
100.0%
me.
99.8%
Oh,
98.4%
it's
89.9%
taken
99.9%
me
99.5%
minutes
99.9%
to
99.9%
get
99.9%
this
99.9%
far
100.0%
in
96.4%
writing
100.0%
my
99.6%
video
99.6%
essay
100.0%
script.
87.9%
So
97.7%
now
99.9%
that
90.3%
ChatGPT
88.9%
has
94.9%
finished
91.8%
its
95.6%
masterpiece,
100.0%
I'd
84.3%
quite
99.3%
like
99.8%
to
99.7%
think
100.0%
it'll
83.8%
be
99.9%
looked
100.0%
at
99.3%
by
99.9%
thousands
100.0%
of
100.0%
viewers.
99.5%
You
96.8%
know,
99.9%
the
98.8%
people
100.0%
who
98.9%
wouldn't
88.7%
spot
99.9%
the
99.4%
spark
98.1%
that
96.3%
AI
99.9%
between
100.0%
the
99.8%
lines.
99.9%
But
99.2%
this
99.7%
machine
100.0%
can
99.7%
take
99.7%
a
99.6%
prompt
100.0%
like
73.0%
research
100.0%
a
99.7%
video
99.9%
essay
100.0%
about
99.9%
AI
99.9%
and
88.0%
the
99.4%
future
100.0%
of
99.9%
work,
100.0%
write
100.0%
questions
100.0%
and
99.8%
answers
100.0%
for
99.5%
imagined
97.4%
interviewees.
99.9%
I
99.3%
could
61.7%
then
99.4%
give
56.1%
actors
99.9%
to
99.7%
perform
91.5%
form,
75.2%
even
100.0%
generate
100.0%
a
99.8%
script
98.5%
that
96.1%
I
99.8%
could
99.3%
read
100.0%
aloud
97.4%
to
99.2%
you.
99.9%
Thanks
99.7%
so
99.1%
much
100.0%
for
99.9%
watching.
100.0%
And
99.4%
Yep,
80.3%
thanks
99.8%
to
99.3%
ChatGPT
95.5%
for
100.0%
writing
100.0%
this
100.0%
video.
99.9%
If
100.0%
you'd
99.9%
like
100.0%
to
99.9%
help
99.8%
support
99.9%
me
99.8%
make
99.2%
more
99.9%
videos
100.0%
like
99.9%
this
100.0%
one,
99.6%
then
98.6%
I
100.0%
will
97.3%
leave
99.9%
a
100.0%
link
100.0%
to
100.0%
my
99.7%
Patreon
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
description
100.0%
along
100.0%
with
100.0%
all
99.9%
my
99.7%
social
100.0%
media
100.0%
so
99.5%
you
99.9%
can
99.9%
find
100.0%
me
100.0%
all
99.9%
over
100.0%
the
100.0%
Internet.
100.0%
And
98.0%
until
100.0%
I
99.9%
see
100.0%
you
99.8%
next
100.0%
time,
99.7%
bye.
99.2%
This
99.8%
video
100.0%
so
99.9%
far
100.0%
has
99.9%
been
100.0%
about
100.0%
workers.
99.1%
But
99.7%
now
99.8%
let's
99.8%
look
100.0%
at
100.0%
the
99.1%
Consumers,
99.6%
the
98.4%
audience,
99.9%
let's
99.9%
turn
100.0%
to
100.0%
you.
99.4%
I
100.0%
want
100.0%
you
99.9%
to
99.9%
sit
100.0%
with
99.9%
whatever
99.9%
feeling
100.0%
you
99.9%
had
99.9%
when
100.0%
you
99.8%
heard
100.0%
me
100.0%
say
99.9%
that
97.8%
this
99.8%
video
100.0%
hadn't
100.0%
been
100.0%
written
100.0%
by
100.0%
me,
100.0%
but
99.8%
by
99.8%
an
99.6%
AI,
97.3%
when
99.9%
I
100.0%
followed
100.0%
it
98.9%
up
99.9%
with
100.0%
a
87.1%
request
100.0%
for
99.9%
funding,
81.1%
when
98.9%
I
99.8%
waited
100.0%
until
100.0%
the
99.9%
last
100.0%
possible
99.9%
second
100.0%
to
99.6%
tell
100.0%
you
95.2%
if
99.6%
your
99.8%
reaction
100.0%
was,
96.2%
wow,
99.7%
she's
99.7%
actually
99.4%
asking
99.8%
us
99.9%
to
100.0%
support
100.0%
her
99.8%
on
100.0%
Patreon
84.3%
for
99.8%
getting
100.0%
an
99.3%
AI
99.9%
to
100.0%
write
100.0%
this,
99.8%
then
99.4%
you're
98.4%
feeling
83.9%
a
99.7%
potential
100.0%
lack
99.9%
of
100.0%
value
100.0%
in
99.9%
entirely
100.0%
AI
99.7%
created
99.9%
content
100.0%
without
100.0%
human
100.0%
inspiration,
99.8%
voice,
99.3%
and
99.9%
passion.
99.9%
If
99.9%
your
99.8%
action
99.9%
was
99.6%
one
99.8%
of
99.9%
betrayal,
100.0%
of
95.4%
feeling
93.9%
deceived,
91.7%
you're
99.2%
feeling
82.5%
the
99.1%
lack
100.0%
of
100.0%
transparency
100.0%
within
98.7%
AI,
97.8%
not
100.0%
just
100.0%
whether
100.0%
it's
99.7%
been
98.7%
used,
100.0%
but
100.0%
what
100.0%
data
100.0%
and
99.9%
sources
81.1%
have
99.8%
gone
100.0%
into
99.9%
creating
93.7%
it.
99.9%
Uh,
93.0%
if
99.7%
your
99.8%
reaction
100.0%
was,
97.4%
oh,
99.4%
God,
99.5%
I
99.9%
couldn't
100.0%
tell
100.0%
the
100.0%
difference,
100.0%
then
99.8%
you're
96.1%
feeling
100.0%
that
99.5%
sense
100.0%
of
100.0%
unease
99.9%
and
99.8%
helplessness
100.0%
at
99.6%
the
100.0%
potential
100.0%
of
100.0%
this
99.6%
technology
100.0%
without
100.0%
regulations
89.3%
or
99.8%
oversights.
86.6%
And
99.2%
if
99.9%
your
99.6%
reaction
100.0%
was,
95.2%
wait,
99.8%
so
99.0%
was
99.0%
that
99.4%
even
99.1%
close
100.0%
to
99.9%
what
99.9%
Rowan
87.5%
actually
97.9%
thought?
99.9%
Then
99.5%
you're
99.7%
feeling
83.9%
the
99.6%
confusion
100.0%
around
99.6%
AI
100.0%
and
99.9%
authenticity.
100.0%
The
99.8%
truth,
94.6%
the
98.9%
actual
99.9%
truth,
99.2%
is
99.8%
that
99.9%
I
100.0%
wrote
100.0%
this
99.8%
entire
99.8%
video.
99.8%
I
99.9%
haven't
99.9%
used
100.0%
AI
99.8%
to
99.9%
research
100.0%
or
100.0%
to
97.7%
write
100.0%
any
99.9%
of
99.9%
it.
99.8%
Um,
96.1%
the
99.9%
point
100.0%
of
99.9%
telling
99.9%
you
99.8%
I
99.8%
had
99.9%
was
100.0%
to
99.9%
turn
100.0%
the
99.7%
questions
99.8%
back
100.0%
on
99.9%
you.
99.9%
Because
99.7%
ultimately,
90.6%
individual
100.0%
workers,
100.0%
the
99.3%
kind
99.9%
of
98.1%
people
100.0%
that
97.0%
I
100.0%
interviewed
96.0%
for
99.5%
this
99.9%
video,
100.0%
having
99.9%
their
100.0%
jobs
99.9%
fundamentally
93.0%
changed,
100.0%
even
99.9%
eliminated
100.0%
altogether
85.8%
by
99.9%
new
100.0%
technologies
95.0%
like
99.4%
AI,
99.8%
have
99.9%
limited
100.0%
power
100.0%
to
100.0%
push
100.0%
back.
99.7%
If
99.9%
those
100.0%
in
99.4%
power
100.0%
think
100.0%
that
89.2%
they
99.8%
can
99.6%
get
100.0%
away
100.0%
with
99.9%
removing
97.8%
workers
100.0%
and
27.6%
asking
100.0%
for
99.8%
fair
99.6%
pay
100.0%
or
99.9%
treatment
100.0%
from
99.9%
companies
100.0%
and
99.2%
businesses,
99.0%
especially
99.6%
if
99.9%
they
99.9%
can
99.7%
be
99.8%
replaced
98.1%
with
99.6%
an
99.3%
AI
100.0%
that
99.8%
might
99.3%
do
99.7%
a
99.8%
subpar
74.2%
job
100.0%
but
99.7%
won't
99.7%
unionize,
85.4%
won't
99.6%
need
99.9%
lunch
100.0%
breaks
83.4%
or
95.6%
pay
99.5%
slips
95.4%
or
99.1%
even
99.4%
sleep,
100.0%
I
99.5%
kind
98.3%
of
99.0%
think
99.9%
they'll
98.9%
be
99.9%
inclined
99.1%
to
99.8%
do
99.7%
it
99.0%
if
99.5%
they
99.9%
can
99.2%
get
100.0%
away
100.0%
with
99.9%
it.
99.6%
And
98.3%
that's
99.9%
where
99.1%
my
99.9%
questions
99.6%
to
99.2%
you
100.0%
come
99.7%
in.
99.5%
Because
98.7%
if
99.9%
you
99.8%
felt
99.8%
cheated,
99.8%
uneasy,
100.0%
concerned
100.0%
about
100.0%
anything
99.9%
so
100.0%
far
100.0%
in
99.7%
the
97.0%
video,
100.0%
but
99.8%
especially
99.9%
about
99.5%
the
99.9%
idea
100.0%
that
99.2%
it
99.2%
all
99.2%
could
99.8%
have
79.9%
been
99.9%
churned
99.7%
out
99.9%
with
99.7%
no
100.0%
discernment,
99.9%
um,
80.9%
on
89.0%
understanding,
99.9%
by
99.2%
a
99.8%
machine,
99.8%
are
99.9%
you
99.9%
willing
100.0%
to
99.9%
let
100.0%
them
99.9%
get
100.0%
away
100.0%
with
100.0%
it?
99.4%
Are
99.9%
you
100.0%
willing
100.0%
to
100.0%
ignore
94.4%
the
99.7%
data
99.9%
theft,
99.7%
the
98.4%
exploited
99.4%
workers,
99.9%
the
99.7%
teams
97.1%
laid
100.0%
off,
99.8%
the
99.4%
hidden
100.0%
bias
99.9%
embedded
99.9%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
system,
100.0%
just
99.8%
because
100.0%
you
100.0%
might
99.9%
be
99.8%
able
99.9%
to
99.8%
get
100.0%
a
99.9%
product
100.0%
or
99.8%
service
100.0%
slightly
100.0%
cheaper?
96.9%
What
61.9%
I
99.8%
want
99.9%
to
99.9%
leave
100.0%
you
99.7%
with
99.3%
in
99.8%
this
99.3%
final
100.0%
part
99.9%
of
81.6%
the
99.1%
video
99.8%
is
96.0%
two
99.9%
potential
100.0%
paths
98.4%
that
99.7%
have
55.9%
been
98.9%
suggested
100.0%
in
99.9%
regards
99.8%
to
99.8%
AI
99.1%
knowing
99.6%
that
99.7%
ultimately
100.0%
we
100.0%
haven't
100.0%
started
99.7%
fully
99.9%
down
96.6%
either
99.9%
one
99.4%
yet.
89.3%
Dystopia.
94.6%
So,
99.6%
way
99.9%
back
100.0%
in
100.0%
2016,
100.0%
I
100.0%
actually
99.8%
made
100.0%
one
99.9%
of
99.9%
my
99.9%
first
99.7%
ever
99.7%
video
99.9%
essays
100.0%
about
99.9%
the
100.0%
future
100.0%
of
99.9%
robotics,
98.9%
particularly
100.0%
automation,
100.0%
and
99.9%
how
100.0%
it
99.5%
intersected
99.9%
with
99.7%
the
99.4%
gendered
88.8%
idea
99.8%
of
99.9%
jobs.
100.0%
And
89.9%
I
99.9%
remember
100.0%
at
99.8%
the
99.3%
time
100.0%
reading
85.3%
this
99.3%
recently
100.0%
released
100.0%
article
99.8%
about
100.0%
a
99.8%
hypothetical
100.0%
future
100.0%
where
98.8%
machines
100.0%
could
99.7%
do
100.0%
any
100.0%
jobs
99.0%
humans
100.0%
could
99.4%
currently
99.3%
do.
100.0%
While
36.3%
doing
100.0%
research
100.0%
for
99.7%
this
100.0%
video,
99.9%
I
99.9%
found
100.0%
it
99.8%
again.
97.9%
Essentially,
100.0%
the
99.9%
writer
100.0%
Ryan
99.5%
Avent,
95.9%
who
99.9%
has
99.7%
since
99.9%
published
100.0%
a
99.9%
book
100.0%
called
99.9%
the
99.5%
wealth
99.9%
of
100.0%
Humans
68.9%
Work
97.6%
and
99.2%
Its
98.4%
absence
99.8%
in
99.5%
the
99.2%
21st
70.2%
21st
70.2%
century,
89.9%
was
99.8%
interested
99.9%
not
100.0%
just
100.0%
in
95.7%
the
99.9%
possibility
99.5%
of
99.9%
this
99.2%
future,
100.0%
but
100.0%
the
99.8%
preparations
99.8%
that
95.2%
it
99.8%
required
99.8%
to
99.8%
handle
100.0%
it.
99.7%
This
99.8%
quote
96.8%
really
99.5%
stuck
99.9%
with
99.9%
me.
99.1%
Reflecting
89.0%
on
99.9%
what
100.0%
a
99.9%
world
100.0%
without
100.0%
work
100.0%
looks
99.9%
like,
83.5%
we
99.4%
then
99.8%
have
99.8%
to
100.0%
figure
89.9%
out
99.7%
what
99.9%
to
99.9%
do
99.9%
not
100.0%
only
99.9%
with
99.1%
ourselves,
100.0%
but
99.9%
with
98.8%
one
99.9%
another.
94.3%
Just
99.9%
as
99.9%
a
99.4%
lottery
100.0%
check
92.6%
does
99.9%
not
100.0%
free
100.0%
the
99.9%
winner
100.0%
from
99.7%
the
99.9%
shackles
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.8%
human
100.0%
condition,
100.0%
all
99.9%
purpose
92.0%
machine
100.0%
intelligence
88.3%
will
99.9%
not
100.0%
magically
100.0%
allow
100.0%
us
99.8%
all
98.8%
to
99.9%
get
100.0%
along.
99.9%
And
98.8%
what
99.9%
is
99.7%
especially
99.9%
tricky
99.9%
about
100.0%
a
99.9%
world
100.0%
without
100.0%
work
99.4%
is
98.3%
that
99.5%
we
100.0%
must
100.0%
begin
98.8%
building
100.0%
the
99.6%
social
100.0%
institutions
85.3%
to
100.0%
survive
100.0%
it
99.7%
long
100.0%
before
100.0%
the
99.9%
technological
100.0%
obsolescence
99.5%
of
100.0%
human
100.0%
workers
99.9%
actually
99.8%
arrives.
93.9%
A
99.9%
dystopian
100.0%
future
100.0%
involving
99.8%
AI
100.0%
for
99.8%
me
100.0%
is
93.9%
exactly
96.8%
this
99.6%
idea
98.8%
that
99.7%
we
100.0%
are
99.6%
not
99.9%
prepared
98.1%
for
99.9%
it.
95.2%
Individual
100.0%
companies
100.0%
will
100.0%
begin
100.0%
to
100.0%
get
100.0%
away
100.0%
with
100.0%
reducing
100.0%
human
100.0%
workers
99.8%
without
100.0%
a
99.4%
thought,
100.0%
or
99.9%
maybe
99.8%
just
99.7%
without
99.6%
a
98.4%
care
100.0%
about
100.0%
how
100.0%
this
99.4%
ripple
100.0%
effect
100.0%
might
99.9%
spread.
100.0%
This
99.9%
is
100.0%
not
100.0%
a
99.9%
technology
100.0%
which
99.6%
is
100.0%
restricted
100.0%
to
100.0%
a
100.0%
particular
100.0%
field
100.0%
where
98.3%
a
99.7%
certain
99.9%
industry
99.7%
is
45.9%
is
95.9%
made
100.0%
obsolete,
100.0%
but
99.7%
is
99.1%
replaced
94.4%
with
99.7%
equivalent
100.0%
work
99.9%
elsewhere
99.7%
to
99.9%
continue
99.9%
a
98.6%
balance
100.0%
of
99.3%
an
98.5%
employed
99.9%
population
96.6%
ready
100.0%
to
100.0%
spend
100.0%
within
99.7%
a
99.8%
capitalist
100.0%
economy.
100.0%
Work
100.0%
is
99.9%
not
99.9%
just
99.8%
a
99.6%
thing
100.0%
we
99.6%
do
100.0%
to
99.9%
kill
100.0%
time,
97.9%
it's
99.4%
how
100.0%
we're
97.0%
supposed
99.9%
to
99.7%
earn
99.2%
the
99.7%
right
99.8%
to
99.8%
shelter,
96.8%
water,
98.3%
food,
100.0%
freedom.
99.8%
If
99.9%
we
100.0%
continue
100.0%
to
99.9%
think
100.0%
of
99.5%
full
99.9%
time
99.9%
work
100.0%
as
99.8%
this
99.4%
mechanism
100.0%
to
99.9%
unlock
100.0%
survival,
100.0%
what
99.9%
happens
100.0%
when
99.9%
the
98.3%
work
100.0%
isn't
99.9%
there?
99.9%
Already
100.0%
we're
99.2%
seeing
100.0%
what
99.5%
anthropologists
92.1%
Mary
92.4%
L.
97.4%
Gray
90.6%
and
97.9%
computational
100.0%
social
100.0%
scientists
94.3%
Sid
96.3%
Suri
86.3%
are
99.7%
calling
99.9%
ghost
99.8%
work
98.8%
pop
99.4%
up
62.7%
to
99.7%
fulfil
89.4%
piecemeal
98.9%
and
99.6%
undesirable
100.0%
jobs
100.0%
left
100.0%
over
86.6%
by
100.0%
new
99.9%
technology.
99.9%
On
99.9%
her
99.9%
website,
99.9%
Grey
70.6%
explains
82.3%
they
99.2%
perform
99.9%
high
95.7%
tech
99.9%
piecework,
89.0%
flagging
99.1%
X
99.3%
rated
100.0%
content,
100.0%
proofreading,
93.3%
designing
100.0%
engine
100.0%
parts,
100.0%
and
99.9%
much
99.5%
more.
99.8%
An
99.9%
estimated
100.0%
8%
99.5%
of
99.6%
Americans
99.9%
have
99.8%
worked
100.0%
at
99.9%
least
100.0%
once
100.0%
in
100.0%
this
99.8%
ghost
100.0%
economy
100.0%
and
99.4%
that
99.9%
number
99.9%
is
100.0%
growing.
99.3%
They
99.9%
usually
91.7%
earn
100.0%
less
100.0%
than
99.9%
legal
100.0%
minimums
99.9%
for
100.0%
traditional
100.0%
work,
98.2%
they
99.4%
have
100.0%
no
100.0%
health
100.0%
benefits
85.0%
and
98.7%
they
99.4%
can
99.8%
be
99.9%
fired
100.0%
at
99.6%
any
100.0%
time
99.4%
for
99.9%
any
99.9%
reason
99.8%
or
92.4%
none.
99.9%
There
99.9%
are
99.9%
no
100.0%
labour
72.6%
laws
100.0%
to
99.3%
govern
100.0%
this
99.9%
kind
99.7%
of
100.0%
work,
100.0%
and
99.1%
these
99.9%
latter
91.7%
day
94.8%
assembly
100.0%
lines
100.0%
draw
100.0%
in
99.6%
and
98.9%
all
99.0%
too
99.0%
often
100.0%
overwork
99.7%
and
99.8%
underpay
99.8%
a
99.5%
surprisingly
95.3%
diverse
100.0%
range
100.0%
of
100.0%
workers,
82.6%
harried
93.9%
young
100.0%
mothers,
99.9%
professionals
100.0%
forced
99.9%
into
99.9%
early
100.0%
retirement,
99.6%
recent
100.0%
grads
99.9%
who
98.1%
can't
99.9%
get
100.0%
a
99.8%
toehold
98.1%
on
99.9%
the
99.8%
traditional
100.0%
employment
100.0%
ladder
100.0%
and
98.9%
minorities
99.1%
shut
100.0%
out
99.7%
of
99.5%
the
99.4%
jobs
99.9%
they
99.9%
want.
100.0%
An
99.7%
interesting
78.1%
number
100.0%
of
100.0%
articles,
99.9%
sources
99.4%
and
99.9%
writing
100.0%
done
99.9%
around
99.9%
AI
99.9%
and
99.7%
the
99.9%
future
100.0%
of
99.9%
work
99.7%
come
98.8%
from
100.0%
those
100.0%
speaking
100.0%
with
100.0%
senior
100.0%
leadership
100.0%
across
100.0%
industries
100.0%
on
100.0%
economic
100.0%
websites
99.9%
and
99.9%
forums.
100.0%
Some
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.7%
quotes
100.0%
to
99.8%
me
100.0%
are
99.9%
wildly
100.0%
revealing.
92.5%
In
100.0%
the
99.9%
Global
100.0%
Policy
99.9%
Journal,
99.9%
for
99.7%
example,
95.6%
I
99.5%
found
99.9%
this
100.0%
quote
87.7%
CEOs
99.1%
across
99.9%
many
100.0%
sectors
95.2%
describe
87.7%
one
99.9%
painful
100.0%
current
99.9%
quandary
85.3%
they've
99.5%
said
100.0%
to
99.9%
me.
95.2%
In
99.4%
effect,
96.2%
I
99.9%
have
100.0%
to
100.0%
lay
100.0%
off
98.7%
hundreds
99.8%
of
100.0%
people
100.0%
because
100.0%
their
99.9%
jobs
100.0%
have
99.9%
disappeared
99.7%
and
53.1%
I
99.8%
do
99.7%
not
100.0%
need
100.0%
their
99.6%
skills.
100.0%
And
99.1%
I
99.9%
have
100.0%
hundreds
99.9%
of
100.0%
job
100.0%
openings
100.0%
I
99.6%
can't
99.7%
fill
98.3%
because
100.0%
I
99.8%
can't
88.0%
find
100.0%
people
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
99.9%
right
100.0%
training
99.9%
and
99.7%
skills.
99.8%
This
99.9%
mismatch
99.9%
is
99.9%
bad
100.0%
for
100.0%
everyone.
94.2%
Lives
100.0%
are
99.7%
derailed,
98.3%
families
100.0%
and
99.8%
communities
89.8%
damaged,
100.0%
business
100.0%
opportunities
82.5%
lost.
99.9%
Like
92.4%
just
99.3%
this
97.0%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
lives,
99.8%
families
99.7%
and
99.9%
communities
99.9%
being
99.7%
placed
100.0%
at
99.9%
the
99.9%
same
100.0%
level
100.0%
of
99.8%
importance
100.0%
as
99.8%
business
100.0%
opportunities
85.1%
being
98.1%
lost
99.9%
feels
100.0%
very
99.4%
telling
99.9%
to
97.6%
me.
98.9%
The
99.8%
thing
100.0%
about
100.0%
Dystopia
98.9%
as
99.7%
a
99.8%
fictional
100.0%
genre
100.0%
is
100.0%
that
99.9%
often
100.0%
it
99.7%
isn't
99.9%
so
99.9%
much
100.0%
an
99.7%
imagined
99.9%
future
100.0%
as
100.0%
a
99.9%
retold
99.7%
present.
99.2%
And
98.5%
indeed
100.0%
we
99.6%
can
99.6%
see
100.0%
this
99.7%
within
99.6%
ghost
99.9%
work
95.8%
in
85.6%
the
49.0%
the
98.6%
us,
97.8%
but
99.6%
also
99.9%
the
99.5%
work
100.0%
being
99.8%
carried
100.0%
out
99.8%
by
100.0%
underpaid
100.0%
and
99.8%
exploited
100.0%
workers
100.0%
in
88.0%
developing
100.0%
nations
99.9%
reportedly
100.0%
paid
99.9%
as
99.9%
little
100.0%
as
99.8%
$1.46
93.8%
an
98.6%
hour
99.9%
after
100.0%
tax
100.0%
by
99.6%
tech
99.6%
giants.
100.0%
As
99.8%
we
100.0%
increasingly
100.0%
see
99.9%
this
99.2%
attitude
97.8%
that
99.9%
humans
99.9%
can
99.8%
be
99.9%
replaced
90.1%
by
99.9%
machines,
100.0%
I
99.6%
think
100.0%
it's
99.5%
not
99.7%
unfair
100.0%
to
100.0%
say
99.9%
that
97.9%
we
99.9%
risk
100.0%
humans
99.9%
being
100.0%
treated
100.0%
like
99.9%
machines
100.0%
on
99.6%
an
99.6%
even
99.8%
greater
100.0%
level
100.0%
than
99.8%
they
99.8%
already
99.9%
are
100.0%
too.
98.1%
In
99.6%
an
99.8%
article
100.0%
arguing
95.8%
that
81.7%
supporting
85.3%
transnational
99.0%
worker
99.4%
organising
71.0%
should
100.0%
be
99.8%
at
29.2%
the
40.0%
at
76.5%
the
100.0%
center
67.1%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
fight
100.0%
for
99.9%
ethical
100.0%
AI,
99.3%
Adrienne
87.5%
Williams,
99.9%
Milagros
98.0%
Micelli
81.5%
and
99.7%
Tim
99.4%
Nit
46.6%
Gebru
62.8%
content
100.0%
moderators,
100.0%
for
98.3%
example,
85.4%
are
99.9%
responsible
100.0%
for
100.0%
finding
100.0%
and
100.0%
flagging
99.5%
content
100.0%
deemed
100.0%
inappropriate
91.8%
for
100.0%
a
99.8%
given
100.0%
platform.
100.0%
In
99.6%
spite
94.6%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
crucial
100.0%
role
100.0%
that
99.5%
content
99.9%
moderators
100.0%
play
100.0%
in
100.0%
both
100.0%
keeping
100.0%
online
100.0%
communities
94.8%
safe
99.9%
and
98.4%
training
99.9%
AI
100.0%
systems,
100.0%
they
100.0%
are
99.7%
often
100.0%
paid
100.0%
miserable
100.0%
wages
100.0%
while
99.8%
working
100.0%
for
100.0%
tech
100.0%
giants
100.0%
and
94.0%
forced
98.9%
to
100.0%
perform
100.0%
traumatic
99.7%
tasks
98.7%
while
99.9%
being
100.0%
closely
100.0%
surveilled.
100.0%
These
100.0%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
required
100.0%
in
96.6%
their
99.9%
job
97.6%
jobs
77.9%
to
99.9%
watch
100.0%
videos
100.0%
of
100.0%
murders,
99.3%
sexual
99.9%
assaults,
99.6%
child
100.0%
abuse
90.2%
and
95.8%
more,
100.0%
to
99.9%
either
100.0%
manually
100.0%
review
100.0%
the
99.8%
content
100.0%
or
98.2%
help
100.0%
train
99.7%
automated
100.0%
systems
100.0%
to
99.9%
do
100.0%
so,
99.9%
seemingly
100.0%
with
100.0%
little
100.0%
to
99.9%
no
100.0%
protections
99.9%
for
100.0%
their
91.1%
emotional
100.0%
and
93.7%
mental
100.0%
health,
100.0%
with
99.8%
the
99.9%
expectations
99.3%
that
99.9%
they
99.9%
function
99.9%
ultimately
96.7%
like
99.9%
emotionless
90.3%
and
100.0%
unaffected
100.0%
machines.
100.0%
We're
85.3%
beginning
85.4%
to
100.0%
see
100.0%
some
100.0%
public
100.0%
backlash
100.0%
and
99.8%
support
100.0%
for
99.9%
workers
100.0%
on
100.0%
social
100.0%
media,
100.0%
but
100.0%
it
100.0%
remains
100.0%
to
100.0%
be
100.0%
seen
89.9%
if
100.0%
it
99.9%
will
99.4%
be
100.0%
enough.
99.7%
Publisher
100.0%
Tor
82.8%
was
100.0%
found
100.0%
to
94.0%
have
100.0%
used
100.0%
AI
99.5%
generated
100.0%
images
100.0%
on
100.0%
the
99.9%
COVID
100.0%
of
100.0%
a
99.9%
new
99.8%
product
22.5%
popular
100.0%
book,
99.9%
but
99.8%
claimed
100.0%
it
100.0%
was
100.0%
too
100.0%
late
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
process
100.0%
to
100.0%
change
100.0%
it
100.0%
now.
99.8%
And
99.2%
Bloomsbury
92.3%
also
99.8%
claimed
99.9%
it
99.9%
had
99.8%
no
99.3%
knowledge
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
AI
99.9%
origins
100.0%
of
99.8%
one
99.8%
of
99.7%
the
100.0%
covers
100.0%
of
99.9%
its
99.6%
titles
99.9%
earlier
100.0%
this
100.0%
year
100.0%
either.
99.6%
It
99.9%
might
100.0%
be
100.0%
plausible
95.4%
during
100.0%
this
99.7%
first
100.0%
foray
99.6%
into
99.9%
AI
99.9%
created
90.2%
design
100.0%
and
99.3%
art,
100.0%
but
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
coming
100.0%
months
100.0%
and
100.0%
years,
100.0%
we'll
99.5%
inevitably
100.0%
see
100.0%
whether
98.0%
consumer
100.0%
disapproval
95.0%
on
99.3%
an
99.8%
ad
100.0%
hoc
99.5%
level
100.0%
is
96.2%
enough
100.0%
to
100.0%
dissuade
96.7%
them
100.0%
entirely.
100.0%
In
100.0%
my
100.0%
interview
76.6%
with
100.0%
Gabe,
99.3%
I
100.0%
asked
99.9%
what
100.0%
he
100.0%
saw
100.0%
as
99.9%
the
99.8%
worst
100.0%
case
100.0%
scenario,
88.2%
and
99.6%
this
100.0%
is
100.0%
what
100.0%
he
100.0%
told
99.9%
me.
70.6%
Worst
97.1%
case
100.0%
scenario
99.3%
is
94.3%
the
99.9%
bosses
99.3%
go,
98.8%
you
99.5%
know
99.9%
what?
99.6%
If
65.1%
we
100.0%
can
100.0%
get
100.0%
90%
93.3%
of
99.8%
the
99.9%
output
100.0%
for
100.0%
10%
94.0%
of
99.9%
the
100.0%
cost,
99.9%
we
100.0%
don't
100.0%
need
100.0%
you
99.8%
anymore.
99.4%
Like
83.5%
that
89.3%
was.
98.3%
It
99.3%
was
100.0%
always,
99.9%
oh
98.9%
well,
99.8%
all
100.0%
of
77.7%
this
100.0%
new
100.0%
tech
100.0%
is
100.0%
going
84.3%
to
100.0%
make
100.0%
us
100.0%
work
99.9%
less.
99.6%
And
99.1%
that
99.9%
somehow
99.8%
hasn't
100.0%
happened
99.7%
yet.
99.4%
Um,
97.7%
and
97.7%
I'm
81.9%
not
99.9%
really
99.9%
confident
100.0%
that
100.0%
AI
98.7%
will,
67.8%
will
100.0%
lead
99.7%
us
100.0%
there,
93.1%
um,
97.4%
just
99.8%
because
100.0%
AI
99.7%
is
100.0%
going
100.0%
to
100.0%
come
100.0%
out
100.0%
of
100.0%
our
100.0%
society
100.0%
and
99.7%
our
100.0%
society
99.9%
is
53.1%
one
100.0%
that
100.0%
amplifies
87.9%
inequalities
88.6%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
smooths
77.4%
them
66.4%
out.
100.0%
For
99.9%
a
99.8%
lot
100.0%
of
99.8%
people,
100.0%
the
99.5%
dystopian
88.3%
element
100.0%
is
99.9%
the
99.6%
idea
100.0%
of
100.0%
machines
86.4%
taking
99.5%
our
99.5%
jobs.
99.9%
But
99.7%
I
100.0%
would
99.8%
argue
100.0%
that
99.5%
maybe
99.9%
the
99.2%
true
100.0%
dystopia
99.7%
is
99.9%
the
99.3%
threat
100.0%
of
99.4%
that
99.8%
leading
99.9%
to
99.9%
higher
99.8%
levels
100.0%
of
100.0%
exploitation
93.3%
and
99.8%
desperation
97.1%
as
99.9%
we
99.9%
are
99.4%
forced
94.6%
to
99.9%
keep
99.9%
working.
99.9%
If
100.0%
jobs
100.0%
are
99.9%
still
99.8%
seen
99.9%
as
99.9%
a
99.6%
necessity
99.1%
going
100.0%
forward,
100.0%
then
99.8%
workers
100.0%
are
100.0%
potentially
89.3%
competing
100.0%
with
100.0%
machines
100.0%
m
85.1%
for
100.0%
these
99.5%
jobs
100.0%
as
100.0%
well
100.0%
as
99.9%
each
100.0%
other.
99.3%
How
100.0%
little
100.0%
will
99.7%
people
99.9%
be
99.8%
willing
100.0%
to
99.7%
be
99.7%
paid?
99.9%
What
100.0%
workplace
99.9%
mistreatment
100.0%
will
99.7%
they
99.9%
be
99.9%
willing
100.0%
to
58.1%
to
95.0%
endure?
99.9%
We've
99.9%
seen
100.0%
how
100.0%
the
100.0%
digital
100.0%
age
100.0%
promising
100.0%
efficiency
97.9%
and
95.3%
productivity
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
99.9%
introduction
91.3%
of
100.0%
the
98.4%
email,
99.4%
the
99.7%
Internet,
99.9%
smartphones
99.7%
and
99.9%
laptops
89.2%
hasn't
99.8%
freed
99.9%
us
99.9%
from
100.0%
the
99.9%
pressures
99.8%
of
99.9%
work,
99.9%
but
100.0%
often
100.0%
amplifies
100.0%
them
99.7%
as
100.0%
work
100.0%
begins
99.9%
to
100.0%
seep
99.9%
into
100.0%
our
99.3%
non
99.9%
work
99.5%
hours
100.0%
with
72.6%
the
99.8%
expectation
99.7%
of
99.9%
being
99.9%
on
99.9%
call
99.9%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
evening
99.6%
and
99.5%
on
99.0%
weekends,
100.0%
or
99.6%
having
99.8%
customer
99.9%
support
100.0%
for
99.0%
even
99.7%
small
100.0%
businesses.
99.6%
24,
91.7%
7
91.7%
this
99.8%
breakdown
99.9%
of
100.0%
labor
89.9%
barriers
89.3%
has
99.9%
even
99.9%
led
99.1%
to
99.9%
proposals
100.0%
for
99.8%
right
99.8%
to
99.9%
disconnect
99.6%
policies
85.1%
or
99.6%
laws
100.0%
that
99.2%
been
56.0%
taken
99.9%
up
100.0%
in
100.0%
various
100.0%
countries
99.9%
around
99.9%
the
100.0%
world,
100.0%
including
100.0%
France
99.9%
and
100.0%
Italy.
99.9%
Workers,
100.0%
if
99.6%
we
100.0%
follow
100.0%
the
100.0%
model
98.5%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
21st
99.7%
century
97.6%
so
99.7%
far,
100.0%
will
99.6%
continue
100.0%
to
100.0%
work
100.0%
as
99.9%
much,
100.0%
perhaps
98.4%
even
99.8%
more
100.0%
than
100.0%
before.
99.7%
The
100.0%
only
100.0%
ones
100.0%
the
99.4%
machines
100.0%
will
99.8%
truly
100.0%
liberate
100.0%
are
98.4%
the
100.0%
rich,
99.9%
whose
99.8%
relationship
100.0%
with
99.9%
these
99.3%
technologies
100.0%
that
99.7%
save
99.9%
money
100.0%
and
99.9%
boost
100.0%
profits
99.8%
of
54.1%
their
99.8%
work
100.0%
is
99.8%
painfully
100.0%
similar
100.0%
to
100.0%
their
99.8%
relationship
100.0%
with
99.9%
human
100.0%
workers
100.0%
themselves.
99.9%
Utopia.
98.5%
Best
99.8%
case
100.0%
scenario
88.3%
is
99.7%
that
89.0%
this
100.0%
becomes
99.9%
a
99.7%
support
100.0%
for
99.9%
people
99.7%
where
98.7%
actually
99.5%
creative
83.9%
people
95.0%
use
100.0%
this
99.9%
to
100.0%
start
100.0%
off
99.9%
projects
99.9%
to
99.8%
get
100.0%
the
99.9%
basic
100.0%
framework
100.0%
down
99.9%
that
99.3%
they
99.9%
can
99.8%
then
99.3%
build
100.0%
on
99.9%
and
99.8%
create
100.0%
new
100.0%
and
99.6%
interesting
91.8%
things.
99.8%
I
99.7%
thought
99.9%
it
99.6%
was
99.6%
only
100.0%
fair
100.0%
to
100.0%
ask
100.0%
Abe
67.6%
about
100.0%
the
99.8%
best
99.9%
case
100.0%
scenario
98.5%
too.
95.5%
But
99.8%
is
99.7%
this
99.7%
really
99.8%
the
100.0%
best
100.0%
we
99.9%
can
99.6%
hope
100.0%
for
98.7%
if
99.9%
we're
99.1%
letting
100.0%
the
99.7%
worst
99.1%
case
100.0%
be
100.0%
a
99.8%
Hellscape
99.6%
nightmare?
100.0%
What
100.0%
might
100.0%
we
99.9%
imagine
94.2%
if
100.0%
we
100.0%
allow
100.0%
ourselves
100.0%
to
99.9%
think
100.0%
of
99.9%
revolutionary
95.9%
positives?
99.3%
At
99.9%
the
100.0%
moment,
100.0%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
we're
99.8%
being
100.0%
sold
100.0%
the
99.9%
aesthetic
88.5%
veneer
99.9%
of
100.0%
a
99.6%
utopia.
99.4%
Save
99.9%
more
99.9%
time,
99.9%
be
99.9%
more
99.8%
productive.
100.0%
Get
100.0%
AI
99.9%
to
100.0%
write
100.0%
this
98.8%
email
99.8%
for
99.5%
you.
99.9%
But
99.6%
that
99.2%
time
100.0%
in
99.9%
our
99.7%
current
99.9%
system
100.0%
that
96.5%
you
99.9%
save
100.0%
inevitably
100.0%
gets
99.9%
refilled
99.6%
with
99.7%
more
99.8%
labour.
77.9%
If
99.8%
it
99.8%
saves
100.0%
time
100.0%
and
99.9%
that
99.4%
time
100.0%
is
99.7%
given
99.6%
back
99.8%
to
99.5%
you
99.8%
and
99.1%
yours
99.9%
to
99.9%
do
99.8%
with
98.9%
what
99.3%
you
99.9%
will,
99.8%
that
99.7%
feels
100.0%
like
99.8%
a
99.9%
fair
99.9%
deal
99.9%
for
99.8%
workers.
100.0%
But
99.8%
that's
99.6%
not
100.0%
how
100.0%
it
99.9%
works,
99.7%
because
99.7%
you're
96.6%
selling
100.0%
hours
100.0%
of
99.9%
your
99.9%
time
100.0%
on
99.9%
earth,
100.0%
not
100.0%
the
99.8%
product
99.9%
of
99.8%
those
99.5%
hours.
100.0%
After
99.9%
all,
99.8%
with
99.8%
most
99.9%
jobs,
99.8%
from
99.9%
office
100.0%
work
99.8%
to
100.0%
retail,
99.9%
if
99.0%
it
99.5%
takes
98.5%
you
99.0%
less
100.0%
time,
99.2%
you
99.9%
don't
100.0%
get
100.0%
to
100.0%
leave
100.0%
early
100.0%
in
99.8%
his
100.0%
famous
100.0%
1930s
99.9%
essay,
99.9%
Economic
100.0%
Possibilities
100.0%
for
100.0%
Our
100.0%
Grandchildren,
95.1%
John
100.0%
Maynard
100.0%
Keynes
78.0%
predicted
100.0%
the
100.0%
kind
100.0%
of
99.9%
technological
100.0%
unemployment
94.1%
that
99.9%
I
100.0%
spoke
99.6%
about
100.0%
earlier,
100.0%
which
99.9%
he
100.0%
defined
100.0%
as
93.2%
unemployment
97.6%
due
100.0%
to
100.0%
our
69.2%
discovery
100.0%
of
99.9%
means
100.0%
of
100.0%
economizing
83.2%
the
100.0%
use
100.0%
of
100.0%
labour,
79.9%
outrunning
99.5%
the
100.0%
pace
100.0%
at
99.8%
which
100.0%
we
100.0%
can
99.8%
find
100.0%
new
100.0%
uses
100.0%
for
100.0%
labour.
74.0%
But
99.8%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
see
100.0%
this
100.0%
as
100.0%
an
100.0%
issue,
100.0%
he
100.0%
envisioned
100.0%
a
100.0%
future
100.0%
where
100.0%
his
100.0%
grandchildren
99.7%
existed
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
99.9%
world
100.0%
where
99.8%
we
99.8%
shall
100.0%
endeavor
80.8%
to
100.0%
spread
100.0%
through
37.0%
bread
99.9%
thin
99.6%
on
99.9%
the
99.8%
butter,
77.1%
to
99.5%
make
100.0%
what
99.9%
work
99.9%
there
99.7%
is
99.3%
still
99.7%
to
99.9%
be
99.9%
done.
100.0%
As
99.9%
widely
100.0%
shared
100.0%
as
99.8%
three
100.0%
hour
93.1%
shifts
99.1%
or
99.8%
a
99.4%
15
100.0%
hour
99.4%
week,
98.0%
this
99.7%
utopian
100.0%
dream
100.0%
was
100.0%
quickly
100.0%
scuppered
97.3%
by
100.0%
the
99.9%
decision
100.0%
to
100.0%
put
100.0%
profit
100.0%
over
100.0%
people,
99.9%
rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
creating
86.5%
an
99.9%
opportunity
100.0%
for
99.9%
revolutionising
90.4%
what
100.0%
it
99.9%
is
99.8%
to
100.0%
earn
100.0%
money
100.0%
and
99.8%
what
99.8%
it
99.8%
can
99.6%
pay
100.0%
for.
100.0%
And
98.5%
to
99.9%
many
99.9%
people
99.8%
today,
99.8%
this
99.9%
might
99.7%
seem
99.8%
like
99.9%
a
99.6%
naive
99.8%
dream
100.0%
of
100.0%
someone
99.8%
theorising
72.9%
decades
100.0%
into
99.7%
the
99.9%
future.
100.0%
But
99.9%
there
100.0%
is
99.9%
some
99.9%
grounding
100.0%
in
62.2%
truth
99.6%
here,
99.6%
especially
100.0%
for
99.9%
someone
95.9%
born
92.4%
in
99.9%
the
99.9%
1880s.
96.6%
The
97.9%
industrial
100.0%
revolutions.
90.4%
So
98.4%
we're
99.3%
now
99.8%
in
99.8%
the
100.0%
fourth
99.9%
industrial
100.0%
revolution.
98.8%
The
99.8%
first
100.0%
was
89.2%
steam
100.0%
and
100.0%
water
99.8%
mechanised
87.2%
power
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
100.0%
late
99.9%
1700s.
89.7%
The
100.0%
second
100.0%
was
100.0%
electricity
100.0%
and
99.6%
mass
100.0%
production
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
late
99.9%
1800s.
88.9%
And
98.9%
the
99.9%
third
100.0%
was
100.0%
electronics
99.9%
and
99.8%
IT
99.3%
from
99.9%
the
99.8%
1950s
93.8%
till,
65.8%
uh,
90.8%
just
99.5%
a
99.9%
few
100.0%
years
100.0%
ago.
100.0%
The
99.7%
second
100.0%
industrial
98.8%
revolution
100.0%
particularly
99.8%
gave
100.0%
way
100.0%
to
100.0%
the
99.9%
rise
86.5%
of
100.0%
workers
97.0%
rights
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
West.
99.6%
It
99.8%
wasn't
100.0%
that,
99.9%
you
61.8%
know,
73.1%
the
99.7%
Industrial
99.3%
Revolution
100.0%
happened
99.8%
and
58.6%
workers
90.9%
rights
100.0%
went
99.9%
alongside
99.9%
of
96.6%
it.
99.9%
Naturally,
98.9%
the
99.5%
new
99.9%
technology
99.9%
itself
99.9%
went
100.0%
hand
100.0%
in
99.8%
hand
100.0%
with
100.0%
exploitation.
99.9%
Just
99.0%
think
100.0%
of
99.9%
any
99.9%
Dickensian
99.8%
tableau
99.3%
full
99.6%
of
100.0%
impoverished
98.8%
workers
100.0%
and
99.7%
child
99.6%
labourers
93.8%
working
100.0%
hellish
78.1%
hours,
100.0%
facilitated
100.0%
by
100.0%
gas
100.0%
and
99.8%
electric
100.0%
lights
99.9%
and
99.9%
machines.
100.0%
It
100.0%
was
100.0%
common
100.0%
for
100.0%
working
100.0%
hours
100.0%
to
99.9%
be
99.9%
between
100.0%
14
100.0%
and
98.1%
16
100.0%
hours
100.0%
a
99.7%
day,
100.0%
six
99.6%
days
100.0%
a
99.9%
week,
100.0%
with
99.9%
infants
100.0%
put
100.0%
to
99.9%
work
100.0%
as
100.0%
soon
100.0%
as
99.9%
they
99.8%
were
99.8%
able.
99.9%
Initial
98.7%
demands
99.8%
for
100.0%
improved
100.0%
working
99.8%
conditions
100.0%
and
99.5%
representation
100.0%
for
99.9%
workers
99.6%
were
99.9%
often
99.8%
met
100.0%
with
100.0%
resistance,
99.8%
from
99.9%
violent
100.0%
events
100.0%
like
100.0%
the
99.8%
Peterloo
99.4%
massacre
100.0%
to
100.0%
attempts
89.2%
to
100.0%
divide
100.0%
and
100.0%
conquer
100.0%
the
100.0%
working
99.9%
class
100.0%
through
100.0%
concessions
94.5%
given
99.2%
only
100.0%
to
99.9%
the
65.1%
upper
100.0%
layers
99.9%
of
99.9%
labourers.
91.7%
In
100.0%
the
100.0%
years
99.8%
before
100.0%
World
97.0%
War
100.0%
I,
99.9%
the
100.0%
UK
100.0%
was
100.0%
home
100.0%
to
100.0%
mounting
99.9%
worker
99.9%
unrest,
100.0%
with
100.0%
hundreds
100.0%
of
100.0%
thousands
99.9%
involved
100.0%
in
100.0%
strikes
100.0%
opposed
99.8%
by
100.0%
force.
100.0%
The
100.0%
number
100.0%
of
99.9%
workers
100.0%
involved
100.0%
in
100.0%
disputes
100.0%
in
99.8%
the
100.0%
UK
100.0%
rose
100.0%
from
100.0%
93,000
99.2%
in
99.1%
1909
99.9%
to
99.8%
1,400,000
99.3%
in
97.9%
1912.
99.9%
What
100.0%
we
100.0%
consider
100.0%
to
99.6%
be
100.0%
normal
100.0%
working
99.9%
conditions
100.0%
now,
67.9%
anti
90.3%
child
99.9%
labour
81.4%
laws,
99.8%
the
99.6%
five
100.0%
day
99.8%
work
99.9%
week,
99.0%
maximum
100.0%
work
99.7%
hours,
100.0%
mandated
96.4%
breaks,
99.4%
health
100.0%
and
99.5%
safety
97.8%
policies
99.9%
and
99.7%
more
99.9%
are
99.6%
working
100.0%
conditions
100.0%
fought
99.6%
for
93.9%
during
100.0%
and
99.5%
due
100.0%
to
99.7%
the
98.2%
previous
100.0%
Industrial
100.0%
Revolutions.
98.1%
I
99.9%
think
100.0%
many
100.0%
people
99.7%
thought
99.9%
that
98.3%
the
99.8%
third
100.0%
Industrial
100.0%
Revolution
100.0%
would
100.0%
do
99.5%
the
100.0%
same,
100.0%
but
100.0%
the
99.7%
revolutionary
90.6%
changes
100.0%
from
99.9%
the
100.0%
19th
99.8%
and
99.9%
20th
92.3%
centuries
99.5%
seem
100.0%
to
99.8%
have
100.0%
stalled.
94.5%
And
99.4%
so
100.0%
we're
83.7%
at
99.9%
this
97.3%
fourth
99.8%
Industrial
96.8%
Revolution
92.3%
solution.
84.6%
And
99.3%
as
99.9%
we
100.0%
saw
100.0%
from
99.1%
my
99.2%
interview
100.0%
with
100.0%
the
99.7%
teacher,
99.4%
it's
99.6%
not
100.0%
just
100.0%
adults
100.0%
but
100.0%
kids
100.0%
who
99.9%
are
100.0%
feeling
100.0%
hopeless
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
100.0%
situation
100.0%
they
100.0%
find
99.9%
themselves
100.0%
in.
99.8%
And
98.5%
on
100.0%
top
100.0%
of
100.0%
that
99.9%
we
100.0%
have
100.0%
these
99.7%
interviews
100.0%
and
99.9%
articles
100.0%
being
99.5%
written
100.0%
by
100.0%
those
100.0%
in
99.9%
economic
100.0%
power
100.0%
saying
99.9%
these
99.7%
ahistorical
99.3%
things
100.0%
to
100.0%
justify
100.0%
keeping
100.0%
the
100.0%
status
93.3%
quo.
88.9%
Klaus
72.6%
Schwab,
96.1%
the
99.7%
founder
100.0%
and
99.9%
executive
100.0%
chairman
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
100.0%
World
99.9%
Economic
100.0%
Forum,
100.0%
wrote,
91.7%
like
100.0%
the
99.8%
revolutions
94.8%
that
99.7%
preceded
99.4%
it,
99.9%
the
99.9%
fourth
100.0%
Industrial
98.4%
Revolution
100.0%
has
99.9%
the
100.0%
potential
100.0%
to
100.0%
raise
100.0%
global
100.0%
income
88.4%
levels
99.9%
and
99.9%
improve
99.8%
the
100.0%
quality
100.0%
of
100.0%
life
100.0%
for
90.4%
populations
100.0%
around
100.0%
the
100.0%
world,
100.0%
as
99.9%
if
100.0%
the
100.0%
Industrial
93.9%
Revolution
100.0%
itself
100.0%
was
99.6%
what
100.0%
improved
99.9%
workers
99.5%
lives
100.0%
and
99.8%
not
100.0%
them
99.9%
tirelessly
99.8%
fighting
100.0%
for
99.9%
their
100.0%
own
100.0%
rights.
99.8%
And
99.5%
so
100.0%
I
100.0%
think
100.0%
this
100.0%
feels
100.0%
like
100.0%
a
100.0%
moment
100.0%
when
99.5%
we
100.0%
should
100.0%
be
100.0%
asking
74.8%
what
99.9%
do
100.0%
we
100.0%
want
100.0%
work
100.0%
to
100.0%
look
100.0%
like?
100.0%
How
100.0%
do
100.0%
we
100.0%
make
100.0%
these
99.9%
technologies
100.0%
work
100.0%
for
100.0%
people
100.0%
young
99.8%
and
100.0%
old?
100.0%
Rather
100.0%
than
100.0%
saying
99.9%
we
99.9%
just
99.8%
have
99.9%
to
100.0%
learn
100.0%
to
99.9%
cope
99.9%
with
100.0%
them.
99.9%
What
100.0%
does
100.0%
it
100.0%
look
100.0%
like
100.0%
for
100.0%
work
100.0%
to
100.0%
feel
100.0%
fair,
100.0%
meaningful?
100.0%
How
100.0%
do
99.9%
we
99.8%
create
100.0%
work
100.0%
that
100.0%
feels
100.0%
like
99.9%
it
99.9%
makes
99.9%
sense,
100.0%
work
99.6%
that
99.9%
people
100.0%
are
100.0%
passionate
100.0%
about,
100.0%
that
99.1%
young
100.0%
people
99.9%
can
99.5%
see
100.0%
a
99.3%
future
100.0%
in?
99.5%
Do
100.0%
we
100.0%
need
100.0%
to
99.9%
work
100.0%
at
99.9%
uh.
79.7%
All
99.7%
having
100.0%
these
99.9%
discussions
100.0%
is
99.9%
easier
100.0%
said
100.0%
than
100.0%
done.
100.0%
But
99.9%
honestly,
100.0%
it
99.9%
kind
99.1%
of
98.3%
feels
100.0%
like
99.9%
it
99.8%
has
99.9%
to
100.0%
happen.
99.9%
Because
99.8%
if
100.0%
you've
97.0%
got
99.9%
to
99.6%
a
99.7%
point
100.0%
where
99.9%
even
100.0%
kids
100.0%
are
99.9%
looking
100.0%
at
99.9%
their
99.6%
future
100.0%
and
99.9%
saying
93.1%
fuck
73.6%
this,
99.9%
there's
84.6%
nothing
98.8%
to
100.0%
try
99.9%
for,
99.9%
we
100.0%
have
99.5%
a
99.9%
bigger
100.0%
problem
100.0%
than
99.6%
whether
99.3%
AI
99.9%
can
99.7%
draw
100.0%
hands
100.0%
or
99.7%
not.
99.9%
This
99.3%
doesn't
100.0%
feel
100.0%
impossible
90.2%
to
99.8%
me.
99.6%
In
99.7%
fact,
100.0%
this
99.9%
new
99.9%
technology
99.9%
seems
99.7%
so
99.8%
well
100.0%
suited
85.3%
when
99.9%
used
100.0%
the
99.9%
right
99.9%
way.
98.1%
If
100.0%
we
100.0%
abandon
99.9%
the
99.7%
current,
98.9%
current
79.1%
factory
99.9%
inspired
76.5%
structure
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
education
100.0%
system,
100.0%
then
99.7%
the
99.8%
fact
100.0%
that
99.3%
AI
99.9%
can
100.0%
write
100.0%
current
100.0%
homework
99.3%
assignments
99.6%
for
99.9%
students
99.9%
isn't
99.6%
as
98.7%
much
100.0%
of
99.6%
an
99.9%
issue.
99.5%
Instead,
100.0%
we
99.8%
might
99.6%
ask,
54.6%
what
99.9%
does
99.9%
it
99.9%
look
100.0%
like
100.0%
to
100.0%
create
100.0%
an
100.0%
education
100.0%
system
100.0%
that
100.0%
isn't
100.0%
just
100.0%
funneling
88.3%
children
100.0%
into
99.8%
the
100.0%
workforce
100.0%
as
99.7%
its
99.4%
underlying
100.0%
goal?
99.8%
What
99.6%
if
99.8%
we
100.0%
put
100.0%
more
100.0%
emphasis
100.0%
on
98.3%
respecting
99.9%
and
100.0%
cultivating
97.0%
that
98.6%
independent
100.0%
thought
99.9%
and
99.9%
analysis
100.0%
over
99.9%
rote
100.0%
learning?
98.4%
How
100.0%
could
99.8%
this
99.8%
technology
100.0%
personalise
85.5%
the
99.8%
education
100.0%
experience?
99.8%
How
100.0%
could
98.2%
it
100.0%
support
100.0%
our
99.8%
overworked
98.6%
teaching
99.9%
staff
52.8%
with
96.9%
technology
100.0%
developing
99.9%
so
100.0%
fast?
100.0%
Instead
100.0%
of
100.0%
doubling
99.9%
down
100.0%
on
99.9%
education
100.0%
as
99.9%
a
99.7%
set
100.0%
portion
100.0%
of
100.0%
your
99.7%
life
99.9%
where
65.6%
you
99.9%
learn
99.1%
from
100.0%
20
99.9%
year
100.0%
old
100.0%
textbooks,
99.9%
what
100.0%
if
100.0%
it
98.8%
was
99.7%
a
99.9%
lifelong
99.9%
rite,
69.8%
not
99.9%
so
99.8%
called
99.6%
continuous
100.0%
up
99.9%
training
83.9%
that
99.3%
suggests
98.7%
time
99.9%
to
100.0%
acquire
99.9%
fresh
100.0%
skills
100.0%
as
100.0%
part
100.0%
of
99.9%
an
99.3%
employee's
99.6%
duty
99.6%
as
100.0%
a
99.8%
worker
99.8%
through
99.5%
their
99.7%
life,
99.5%
but
99.5%
access
100.0%
to
100.0%
knowledge
100.0%
that
99.7%
isn't
100.0%
put
99.7%
in
99.8%
place
100.0%
for
100.0%
the
99.9%
sake
100.0%
of
99.8%
profit
100.0%
or
99.8%
productivity.
100.0%
Potentially
92.6%
the
100.0%
most
100.0%
obvious
100.0%
suggestion
99.9%
for
99.8%
this
99.6%
future,
99.7%
where
99.7%
work
100.0%
itself
100.0%
is
99.9%
uncertain,
99.7%
at
99.7%
least
99.9%
in
99.9%
its
99.6%
current
100.0%
guise
99.2%
as
99.7%
a
99.6%
necessity
100.0%
for
99.9%
survival,
99.8%
is
97.2%
universal
100.0%
basic
100.0%
income.
100.0%
This
99.5%
idea
100.0%
has
99.6%
been
100.0%
a
99.8%
source
100.0%
of
99.9%
commentary
100.0%
in
99.9%
recent
100.0%
years,
100.0%
but
99.9%
it
98.6%
is
52.4%
far
100.0%
from
100.0%
new.
89.6%
It
99.8%
actually
99.7%
gained
100.0%
a
99.8%
wide
99.9%
leap
100.0%
in
99.9%
popular
100.0%
awareness
100.0%
during
100.0%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
Industrial
100.0%
Revolution.
99.9%
Essentially,
100.0%
it
100.0%
proposes
99.9%
a
100.0%
system
100.0%
where
100.0%
universal
100.0%
unconditional
100.0%
payments
100.0%
are
100.0%
given
100.0%
by
100.0%
the
100.0%
state
100.0%
to
100.0%
people
100.0%
to
100.0%
provide
100.0%
them
100.0%
with
99.5%
just
99.2%
enough
99.9%
money
99.8%
to
99.9%
live
100.0%
on.
99.8%
Unlike,
97.8%
um,
89.3%
many
100.0%
traditional
90.2%
ideas
99.9%
of
99.9%
social
100.0%
welfare,
90.2%
this
99.8%
wouldn't
99.9%
be
99.4%
means
63.1%
means
75.0%
tested
98.9%
or
99.8%
require
76.0%
the
99.8%
recipient
100.0%
to
99.9%
work,
100.0%
or
100.0%
be
99.8%
looking
100.0%
for
99.9%
work
100.0%
to
100.0%
obtain
99.7%
it,
99.7%
and
99.1%
it
99.8%
would
99.8%
indeed
87.3%
actually
99.6%
be
100.0%
enough
100.0%
to
99.9%
cover
100.0%
what
100.0%
you
100.0%
need
100.0%
to
99.9%
survive.
100.0%
Newbi
91.2%
hasn't
100.0%
been
100.0%
introduced
100.0%
across
100.0%
an
98.5%
entire
99.0%
country
100.0%
yet.
100.0%
Uh,
94.7%
but
99.8%
remember,
95.5%
we're
99.5%
allowing
100.0%
ourselves
99.9%
to
99.9%
dream
100.0%
in
99.7%
this
99.9%
section
100.0%
of
99.6%
the
97.2%
video.
100.0%
The
99.9%
theory
100.0%
behind
100.0%
this
99.8%
idea
100.0%
is
99.9%
that
99.9%
providing
93.4%
people
100.0%
with
98.9%
the
99.6%
money
100.0%
they
99.8%
need
100.0%
to
100.0%
obtain
100.0%
things
99.9%
like
99.7%
shelter,
98.0%
food,
100.0%
water
100.0%
heating
100.0%
and
99.9%
electricity,
100.0%
just
99.7%
because
100.0%
we
100.0%
agree
100.0%
that
97.9%
those
98.6%
are
99.8%
things
100.0%
that
97.9%
human
100.0%
beings
99.8%
need
100.0%
and
99.4%
deserve
99.5%
will
65.0%
give
99.9%
them
98.5%
a
51.2%
huge
99.9%
amount
100.0%
of
99.3%
freedom.
98.9%
Freedom
86.1%
to
100.0%
pursue
100.0%
their
99.9%
talents,
99.9%
to
99.7%
find
100.0%
work
100.0%
that
100.0%
satisfies
100.0%
them
99.9%
to
99.3%
take
100.0%
time
100.0%
off
100.0%
to
99.7%
look
100.0%
after
100.0%
family,
99.9%
not
100.0%
be
98.0%
weighed
99.8%
down
100.0%
by
100.0%
the
99.9%
mental
100.0%
stresses
99.5%
of
99.9%
survival.
100.0%
Something
99.9%
that
99.8%
feels
100.0%
like
99.8%
it
99.6%
should
100.0%
be
99.9%
available
99.9%
to
99.9%
all
99.9%
of
99.8%
us
100.0%
living
100.0%
in
100.0%
a
100.0%
world
100.0%
that
99.9%
has
99.9%
so
100.0%
much
100.0%
wealth
100.0%
and
100.0%
technology
100.0%
in
99.8%
it,
100.0%
rather
100.0%
than
99.9%
scramble
99.8%
to
100.0%
find
100.0%
jobs
100.0%
for
100.0%
those
100.0%
left
100.0%
unemployed
100.0%
by
100.0%
potential
100.0%
industry
99.9%
overhauls.
99.8%
As
99.2%
new
100.0%
technology
100.0%
competes
99.9%
with
100.0%
human
99.9%
workers
99.9%
for
99.9%
jobs,
99.5%
why
100.0%
not
100.0%
imagine
96.4%
something
100.0%
better?
100.0%
Like
99.8%
I
99.9%
already
99.9%
pointed
100.0%
out
99.8%
earlier
100.0%
in
99.9%
the
98.6%
video,
97.4%
the
27.6%
this
97.7%
is
99.8%
far
100.0%
from
99.9%
the
100.0%
first
100.0%
time
99.9%
a
99.0%
monumental
93.2%
technological
99.6%
change
100.0%
has
99.8%
been
99.9%
upon
99.3%
us
99.9%
in
100.0%
the
100.0%
past.
100.0%
We've
93.1%
managed
100.0%
to
99.9%
use
99.9%
such
100.0%
a
99.4%
period
100.0%
in
99.4%
history
100.0%
to
100.0%
push
100.0%
for
99.9%
radical,
100.0%
unthinkable
99.9%
changes
99.9%
to
99.8%
our
100.0%
lives,
99.9%
jobs
100.0%
and
94.0%
rights
99.7%
AI
99.6%
can
100.0%
be
99.8%
used
99.8%
for
99.9%
good,
100.0%
specifically
100.0%
when
99.9%
used
99.9%
to
99.9%
improve
100.0%
workers
97.2%
lives
100.0%
and
99.8%
experiences,
99.9%
not
99.9%
to
99.7%
replace
100.0%
them.
99.8%
In
100.0%
almost
100.0%
every
100.0%
industry
100.0%
from
100.0%
fashion
100.0%
to
100.0%
food,
100.0%
we're
99.8%
used
100.0%
to
100.0%
putting
100.0%
ethical
100.0%
questions
99.9%
to
99.2%
the
99.9%
back
100.0%
of
99.9%
our
99.8%
minds.
90.0%
The
99.8%
five
99.8%
pound
99.2%
shirt
99.9%
or
99.8%
the
98.5%
out
99.8%
of
99.8%
season
100.0%
produce
99.4%
is
98.3%
there
94.1%
ready
100.0%
for
99.4%
us
100.0%
to
100.0%
consume.
97.2%
We
99.8%
don't
99.9%
have
99.8%
to
99.9%
think
100.0%
about
100.0%
the
99.9%
implications
100.0%
of
99.8%
that.
98.4%
In
99.7%
this
99.7%
utopian
99.9%
path
100.0%
we're
98.2%
peering
99.6%
down,
100.0%
could
99.9%
this
99.9%
fundamental
95.1%
shift
100.0%
in
99.8%
white
99.9%
and
99.1%
blue
99.9%
collar
99.0%
western
99.9%
jobs
99.9%
also
99.5%
allow
100.0%
for
99.8%
a
98.5%
revaluing
90.4%
of
99.7%
workers
100.0%
the
99.4%
world
100.0%
over?
99.9%
And
97.2%
so
99.8%
I
99.8%
ask
99.4%
you
99.6%
finally
99.6%
to
98.5%
think
100.0%
about
99.8%
this
99.5%
last
99.9%
question.
53.1%
What
99.9%
could
79.5%
we
99.7%
push
100.0%
for
99.6%
now
100.0%
that
99.9%
would
87.1%
create
100.0%
a
99.9%
world
100.0%
of
99.8%
possibility
99.8%
and
70.6%
potential
100.0%
for
100.0%
all
99.9%
if
99.9%
we
100.0%
decided
99.9%
that
99.6%
the
99.9%
goal
100.0%
of
99.9%
technology
100.0%
is
99.9%
to
99.9%
make
99.8%
the
16.9%
life
99.7%
easier,
100.0%
more
100.0%
fulfilling
90.6%
and
100.0%
happier
100.0%
in
100.0%
service
100.0%
of
99.9%
all
100.0%
of
99.7%
humanity?
100.0%
And
98.2%
would
100.0%
you
100.0%
be
100.0%
willing
100.0%
to
100.0%
join
100.0%
that
99.5%
push?
100.0%
Thank
99.9%
you
100.0%
for
100.0%
watching.
86.5%
Uh,
92.3%
this
100.0%
is
100.0%
actually
99.8%
the
100.0%
end
100.0%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
video
100.0%
now
99.8%
and
99.7%
I
100.0%
would
100.0%
genuinely
99.9%
love
100.0%
to
100.0%
know
100.0%
what
100.0%
you
100.0%
thought
99.9%
of
100.0%
the
99.9%
topic
100.0%
in
99.9%
general
100.0%
because
95.2%
it's
99.8%
a
100.0%
huge
100.0%
topic,
100.0%
but
99.9%
also
100.0%
this
100.0%
particular
100.0%
video
100.0%
and
99.8%
the
99.9%
weird
88.2%
structured
81.4%
stuff
100.0%
I
99.9%
was
100.0%
doing
100.0%
with
99.9%
it,
99.6%
something
99.9%
a
99.9%
little
99.9%
bit
99.8%
experimental,
99.7%
let
100.0%
me
100.0%
know
100.0%
what
99.7%
you
100.0%
thought.
99.6%
Also,
99.9%
if
100.0%
you're
99.9%
interested
100.0%
in
100.0%
the
99.9%
longer
100.0%
cuts
100.0%
of
99.9%
the
99.9%
interviews
86.3%
from
99.9%
this
100.0%
video,
99.9%
including
99.9%
a
100.0%
bonus
100.0%
one
99.8%
which
99.9%
I
99.9%
couldn't
100.0%
really
99.8%
figure
100.0%
out
100.0%
how
99.9%
to
100.0%
fit
100.0%
into
99.8%
the
99.8%
video
100.0%
with
99.9%
an
99.9%
amazing
95.6%
doc
79.1%
dominatrix
98.3%
who
99.9%
also
100.0%
knows
100.0%
a
100.0%
bunch
100.0%
about
99.9%
AI,
100.0%
uh,
92.8%
then
99.9%
I
100.0%
will
99.9%
be
100.0%
putting
94.5%
them
99.9%
up
99.9%
on
100.0%
my
100.0%
Patreon
100.0%
as
100.0%
well
100.0%
and
99.6%
as
100.0%
usual,
100.0%
until
100.0%
I
100.0%
see
100.0%
you
100.0%
next
100.0%
time.
99.9%
Bye.
99.2%

SpeechMog

Hoverest AB (5594118548)

Email: hugo.contact01@gmail.com